1 / 13

Vector-borne Disease Surveillance in Southeast Asia – Challenges and Opportunities in Vector Collection and Pathogen D

Vector-borne Disease Surveillance in Southeast Asia – Challenges and Opportunities in Vector Collection and Pathogen Detection MAJ Brian Evans, Ph.D.; Jim McAvin; Alongkot Ponlawat, PhD; Ratree Takhampunya, PhD; LTC Jason Richardson, PhD . Mission Intelligence requirements

tansy
Télécharger la présentation

Vector-borne Disease Surveillance in Southeast Asia – Challenges and Opportunities in Vector Collection and Pathogen D

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Vector-borne Disease Surveillance in Southeast Asia – Challenges and Opportunities in Vector Collection and Pathogen Detection MAJ Brian Evans, Ph.D.; Jim McAvin; Alongkot Ponlawat, PhD; Ratree Takhampunya, PhD; LTC Jason Richardson, PhD

  2. Mission Intelligence requirements PM detachment capabilities Detection capabilities (JBAIDS) Value of pathogen assays Where is the gap? Conclusion Agenda

  3. To accurately asses the risk of vector-borne disease in an AO and to recommend/ implement measures that reduce the disease threat among soldiers. Mission

  4. Human case data Vector data (presence/absence) Pathogen data (presence/absence) Environmental data Intelligence Requirements

  5. Pre-deployment intelligence Gather case data (non-specific/specific) Limited vector surveillance Limited or no pathogen detection capability. PM Detachment Capabilities

  6. Detection Capability

  7. Value of Pathogen Assays Assumptions: Case data is specific in number and location. Vector surveillance, pathogen detection tools, and control tools are effective.

  8. Case data is valuable!

  9. Adult mosquito/sand fly collection devices minimally effective; taxonomic keys 1 or 2 Ae. aegypti /house (15 mins/house); countless man-hours and houses needed for sufficient sample sizes (1 in 1000 infected); this is an area where there is transmission of dengue year-round. Where is the gap?

  10. Where is the gap? BG Sentinel (BG Lure) Bed net trap - NAMRU-2

  11. Rodent-baited traps as a tool for collecting chigger mites, vectors of scrub typhus. Where is the gap? Figure 13: Field caught rodent on snap trap & Figure 4: Rodent with chiggers

  12. Low densities; seasonality? How does pathogen/vector data translate into risk? What does it mean to have 6 in 1000 infected; should I be concerned? Even when we know the vector locations and where the pathogen is most prevalent in the vector, do we understand the biology? Not one-size fits all solutions; same species from different locations may have evolved independently; different vector ecology Other Challenges?

  13. Bottom-line: Pathogen detection has greatest added value for risk determination and control efficacy in instances where there is limited or no case data. If disease is seasonal, a valuable forecasting tool. Challenge: Relevancy of pathogen detection data is highly-dependent on the vector surveillance tool. Pathogen surveillance should be a critical part of the PM mission; need more effective surveillance tools to complement this mission; need trained soldiers who can interpret information/data. Where time/resources/money are limited, should be very selective about when and where to use pathogen detection assays. Conclusion

More Related