1 / 8

Context and background

Self Evaluation & Inspection Jeff Williams Head of Quality & Inspection UCET Annual Conference 2007. Context and background. Increased focus on self-evaluation and benchmarking up to 2006 Requests from providers for common document and guidance

tatiana-blackwell
Télécharger la présentation

Context and background

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Self Evaluation & InspectionJeff WilliamsHead of Quality & InspectionUCET Annual Conference 2007

  2. Context and background • Increased focus on self-evaluation and benchmarking up to 2006 • Requests from providers for common document and guidance • Must link to Ofsted drivers and coherence in inspection planning • Reducing burdens and bureaucracy – initial tension? • Focus group : purpose and developments

  3. Rationale • SED allows providers to demonstrate how well you evaluate provision • Fundamental purpose : to provide structure and format for data currently collected, and to record existing evaluations • Does not replace the need for Strategic / Improvement Plans • Non-statutory in nature – information presented as annexes, and current data and evidence can remain if fit for purpose • ITT based – L&S sector is developing alongside • Focus on outcomes and impact

  4. Current areas of focus in the SED • Context of provision • Main Priorities for Improvement • Compliance check • Standards Grades • Selection Data • Training and Assessment • Value Added by the Training • Management & Quality Assurance • Overall Effectivness • Capacity to Improve Further

  5. Issues emerging for some providers • Grading of trainees • Availability of trend and historic data • Moderation and validation of evaluation judgements • Selection data and evaluating potential

  6. To support the process • Further discussion at TDA-Ofsted Conferences : December 4 & 6 • Provider views via joint TDA-Ofsted consultation : January-March 2008 • Regional TDA workshops : January 2008 • TDA Data Profile for all providers (by route and phase) • TDA Consultancy – ongoing; specific if requested

  7. Jeff WilliamsJeff.Williams@tda.gov.uk

  8. Possible discussion points • Is it reasonable to ask for all providers to send their on-going self-evaluation annually? • Is the timing (to fit in with inspection requirements) feasible? • To what extent will existing systems and documentation need refining? • What issues spring to mind – and what additional guidance would be helpful?

More Related