1 / 15

ABET LEVEL 4 JUNE 2002

ABET LEVEL 4 JUNE 2002. EXAMINATION REPORT. ABET level 4 June 2002. Positives: Significant increase in pass percentage in 8 of eleven learning areas. Large increases in isiXhosa, Life Orientation and Natural Sciences. Split of MLMMS into ML was very successful – 70% pass rate

temira
Télécharger la présentation

ABET LEVEL 4 JUNE 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ABET LEVEL 4 JUNE 2002 EXAMINATION REPORT

  2. ABET level 4 June 2002 Positives: • Significant increase in pass percentage in 8 of eleven learning areas. • Large increases in isiXhosa, Life Orientation and Natural Sciences. • Split of MLMMS into ML was very successful – 70% pass rate • Increased participation of other sectors.

  3. ABET Level 4 June 2002Percentage pass rate per L.A.

  4. ABET Level 4 June 2002LLC: English • Pleasing to see previous reports have been read and suggestions implemented. • Language level of candidates generally low. • Lack of comprehension is evident. • Educators should study the national guidelines. • Require national intervention – English for learners whose home language is not Eng.

  5. ABET Level 4 June 2002LLC: Afrikaans • Needs to be better placement of learners. • Educators appear to be more confident in the teaching of the various unit standards. • Learners need to read the questions properly. • Grammar and sentence construction were two areas that needed attention.

  6. ABET Level 4 June 2002LLC: isXhosa • Candidates showed a lack of practice in writing. • Sections on summarising and analysis of a poem were poorly done or not attempted. • It appears that candidates coped better with questions that did not expect them to think independantly. • Many questions were too short for the marks allocated.

  7. ABET Level 4 June 2002Mathematical Literacy • Section A of the paper contributed to ML. • Report focuses on areas that require attention. • Problems included geometric and number patterns, decimals, time and volume.

  8. ABET Level 4 June 2002Mathematical Sciences • Report draws attention to areas that need assistance. • Problems with time, percentages, decimals. • Candidates could not interpret information from a table that was provided. • Most candidates struggled with algebra. • Most candidates struggled with drawing of a bar graph.

  9. ABET Level 4 June 2002Arts and Culture • General improvement in candidates ability to answer the questions. • Candidates appeared to be more confident. • Literacy still a problem. • Candidates did not recognise technical terms. • Teaching should ensure that candidates read illustrations through their own interpretation rather than merely describing what they see.

  10. ABET Level 4 June 2002EMS • Generally an improvement in candidates understanding of aspects of EMS such as the cash receipt journal and cash payment journal. • Recommends using a specialist to present the accounting section of the US. • Candidates able to read tables but unable to analyse the data. • Candidates require greater exposure to case studies. • Use the assessment guidelines to prepare the learenrs.

  11. ABET Level 4 June 2002Human & Social Sciences • Candidates should attempt all the MCQs as there is no negative marking. • Candidates did not understand or were not taught specific terms in history e.g movement, association and expression. • Very little skill in interpreting graphs. • Problems re drawing conclusions, arguing own point of view and understanding. • Candidates need to be exposed to everyday problems in their communities.

  12. ABET Level 4 June 2002Life Orientation • Successful as learners did very well. • Answering MCQs problem – need technical guidance. • Terminology appeared to another problem area. • All teachers must teach emergency procedures and reporting emergency situations.

  13. ABET Level 4 June 2002Natural Sciences • Pleased by overall improvement by candidates. • Specific content problems are mentioned in the report e.g. cells, natural resources, sources of energy – all mentioned in the range statements. • Examination technique a problem • reading questions carefully. • drawing a table. • Answers that were too short when asked to explain.

  14. ABET Level 4 June 2002Technology • General lack of understanding of the content needed in this learning area. • Answers show a lack of study or application. • Learner’s need prior assistance in planning an answer sheet e.g numbering correctly.

  15. ABET Level 4 June 2002SMME • Not sure whether the candidates did poorly because of reading and interpretation problems or because they were not ready for the examination. • Some candidates are not ready in terms of examination technique wrt reading, writing, interpreting and analysing texts. • Suggests that the language used be made simpler. • Recommends training of teachers and assessment of their knowledge of the learning area.

More Related