1 / 16

David Massart, European Schoolnet October 2, 2006

CELEBRATE’s Lessons. David Massart, European Schoolnet October 2, 2006. Outline. - CELEBRATE - Approach - Limitations - Identified Problems. CELEBRATE. Strategic, large-scale, demonstration project (€7M Information Society Technologies – IST) Ran from June 2002 to November 2004

terri
Télécharger la présentation

David Massart, European Schoolnet October 2, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CELEBRATE’s Lessons David Massart, European Schoolnet October 2, 2006

  2. Outline - CELEBRATE - Approach - Limitations - Identified Problems

  3. CELEBRATE • Strategic, large-scale, demonstration project (€7M Information Society Technologies – IST) • Ran from June 2002 to November 2004 • Developed and successfully demonstrated a federated learning object brokerage system architecture • Made available to over 319 schools in six countries approximately 1350 learning objects produced by both public and private sector content developers.

  4. Goals • Provide an easy way for teachers and pupils to get access to learning resources scattered between different e-learning systems • Understand how “learning objects” are used and re-used in classrooms and what is their pedagogical impact

  5. A 4-Step Scenario For The Exchange of Learning Resources • Search the pool of existing resources • Assess their usefulness on the basis of search results • Obtain relevant resources and (re)use them transparently regardless of the technical complexity associated with the resources and the technical platforms involved, and • Do all this in a way that respects the intellectual property associated with the resources involved

  6. A Successful Demonstration ... CELEBRATE successfully demonstrated that: • Teachers are enthusiastic about Learning Objects (LOs) • Emerging standards (for interoperability) make it easier for schools to exchange and reuse LOs • Given simple, user-friendly authoring tools, some teachers are capable of developing high-quality learning resources • Several Ministries of Education are interested in exchanging resources via a new educational content web portal

  7. ... BUT • Adoption was problematic • No one joined the federation after the end of the project

  8. Approach • Offering a complete solution for discovering and exchanging learning content • Federating e-learning systems around a brokerage system responsible for: • Carrying and Routing messages exchanged by the federation members (technical interoperability) • Enforcing semantic interoperability • Digitally managing rights

  9. Approach (cont.) For each problem • Select the “best” solution • Design a protocol accordingly • Make support of the protocol mandatory to join the federation

  10. Learning Resource Discovery • Federated searching • CALIBRATE LOM application profile adapted to the context of schools in Europe • Mandatory, recommended, and optional elements • Multilingual controlled vocabularies and thesaurus • Ad hoc query language • Ad hoc query interface

  11. Learning Resource Exchange • ODRL description of rights (metadata) • Authorized uses defined by agreements • Negotiated between resource producers and consumers • Stored, managed, and enforced by the brokerage system

  12. So, What Went Wrong? • Technical interoperability: All or nothing ? • Semantic interoperability: Is it affordable ? • Digital rights management: What for ?

  13. All Or Nothing ? • Why do I need to support DRM if I only propose / search for free resources ? • Why do I have to support your application profile/query language if mine is good enough for me? • Couldn’t you make the effort necessary to join the federation proportional to the services I need ?

  14. Is it affordable ? A good application profile: • Improves semantic interoperability • Requires specialized indexers • Has a cost proportional to the number of resources to describe • Potentially restricts the use of a resource • Is difficult to adapt to new requirements

  15. What For ? DRM is fine but: • commercial content providers were not ready and/or did not yet have a businessmodel for providing content through a federation • Chicken and egg situation: Not enough users to draw content providers’ attention and not enough content to keep users.

  16. Question ? Thank you

More Related