1 / 51

Practice and Procedure

Practice and Procedure. Robert R. Oliva, Ph.D. U.A.L.R. Agenda. I. Primary Authorities within Executive Branch II. Practice and Procedure III. Follow a return. Primary Authorities: Executive. U.S. Treasury Internal Revenue Service. U.S. Treasury. “TD PROCESS” PROPOSED

tessa
Télécharger la présentation

Practice and Procedure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Practice and Procedure Robert R. Oliva, Ph.D. U.A.L.R.

  2. Agenda • I. Primary Authorities within Executive Branch • II. Practice and Procedure • III. Follow a return

  3. Primary Authorities: Executive • U.S. Treasury • Internal Revenue Service

  4. U.S. Treasury • “TD PROCESS” • PROPOSED • shall also be issued as a proposed regulation • TEMPORARY • shall expire within 3 years after the date of issuance • FINAL: TD # • Judicial review

  5. Judicial review • INTERPRETATIVE • “ACU” • QUASILEGISLATIVE • Settle • RE-ENACTMENT DOCTRINE • Settle • RETROACTIVITY

  6. Retroactivity • Unless superseded by specific section in the law, • If > 18 months since enactment • Not earlier than: filing date or substantial notice • If <18 months since enactment: • To date of enactment

  7. IRS • REVENUE RULINGS/PROCEDURES • PLR’s; DETERMINATION LETTERS • TAM’s • ACQUIESCENCES AND NONACQUIESCENCES • IRM • AOD’s; GCM’s

  8. REVENUE RULINGS/PROCEDURES • DIFFERENCES • SIMILARITIES • RETROACTIVITY: • Yes • Limitations: as announced by IRS

  9. PLR’S AND DETERMINATION LETTERS • DIFFERENCES • SIMILARITIES

  10. TAM’S • DEFINITION/EFFECT • TIME AND PLACE

  11. ACQUIESCENCES AND NONACQUIESCENCES • US TAX COURT • REGULAR OPINIONS • ISSUES AGAINST IRS • MEMORANDUM OPINIONS • PERMANENCY • Other courts

  12. II. Practice & Procedure • A. Penalties • B. Circular 230

  13. Taxpayers’ penalties: IRC 6662 • Negligence • Disregard • Substantial understatement or a variation

  14. Defenses to negligence: • “reasonable basis”

  15. Defenses to disregard for rulings • Realistic possibility of being sustained on the merits (RPOBS)

  16. Defenses to disregard of IRC/REGS • “Substantial authorities”

  17. Defenses to substantial understatement • “Substantial authorities” (S/A): If no tax shelters • S/A + MLTN: if tax shelter and t/p not a corp.

  18. Generic defense • Against all of the above taxpayer penalties: • RCGF: IRC 6664(c)(1)

  19. “substantial authority” • Objective “analysis” of the law and application of the law to the relevant facts

  20. Nature of the “analysis” • Weight of authority depends on • Relevance • Persuasiveness • Type of document • Absence of authority ok if position supported by well-reasoned IRC construction

  21. Relevance • Material facts at issue are similar to those in the authority (not distinguishable) • Authority is still applicable to the facts at issue

  22. Persuasiveness • Authority cogently relates applicable law to the facts

  23. Type of document • Rev. Rul. > PLR • Recent authorities > older authorities • PLR, TAM, GCM, or AOD > 10 years old accorded very little weight

  24. Type of substantial authorities • Legislative • Executive • Judicial

  25. Exceptions: • Above authorities will not be considered “s/a” if they are , implicitly or explicitly, • Overruled • Modified • But TC opinion is not overruled or modified if a COA from another CIR holds otherwise.

  26. The following are not considered “s/a” • Treatises • Legal periodicals • Legal opinions

  27. Preparers’ minimum standards • Ethical • Legal

  28. Ethical • Principles: integrity; due care • Rules: contingent fees • Section on Taxation: • Do not recommend, prepare, or sign return if tax position has no realistic possibility of being sustained administratively or judicially (RPOBS). • Exception: not frivolous and adequately disclosed

  29. Authorities satisfying RPOBS standard: • All primary and substantial authorities, plus • Broader than “primary authorities” and “substantial authorities” standard • Articles, treatises (neither primary nor substantial) • JCT’s general explanation of a revenue act (not primary) • Prop. Treas. Regs. (Not primary)

  30. RPOBS • Good faith belief position • Is warranted in existing law • Can be supported by extension, modification, or reversal of existing law • Cannot be expressed in terms of percentage odds: • Cir. 230 and IRC 6694 use percentage odds to define RPOBS.

  31. Legal obligations • Circular 230 • IRC 6694: standard to avoid preparers’ penalties

  32. Circular 230: tax return positions • May sign return when • There is a realistic possibility of being sustained, or • It is not frivolous and is adequately disclosed • Must inform clients as to penalties and how to avoid by disclosure

  33. “Realistic possibility” • Knowledgeable person conclude that position has a one in three, or greater, likelihood of being sustained • May use “substantial authorities” • May not figure chances of being audited

  34. Disciplinary actions • Violations due to willfulness, reckless, or gross incompetence will subject practitioner to suspension or disbarment from practice before the IRS

  35. Other sections in Circular 230 • Definitions: CPA; practice • Who may practice: Form 2848; limited practice • Others: knowledge of client’s omission; notaries; fees; conflicts of interest; negotiation of taxpayer refund check

  36. IRC 6694(a) • If any part of any understatement ... is due to a position for which there was no realistic possibility of being sustained (RPBS) .... • ITRP shall pay a penalty of $250

  37. IRC 6694(a): defenses • ITRP did not know or could not have reasonably known that the position lacked “RPBS” • Position lacking RPOBS • Was not frivolous • Was adequately disclosed • RCGF • Reas. Cause for understatement • ITRP acted in good faith

  38. IRC 6694(b): willful or reckless conduct • ITRP shall pay $1,000 (and referral to director of practice) if • Any part of any understatement is due to ITRP’s • Willful attempt to understate liability, or • Reckless or intentional disregard of rules or regulations

  39. III. Follow a return • Defining a “return” • Statute of limitations • Phases: audit; examinations; appeals; assessment; collection

  40. Defining a “return” • Why should there be a return? • Statute of limitations to issue 90 days letter • Self-assesment system • IRS’ assessment requires 90 days notice

  41. Elements of a return • Sufficient data • Intent • Reasonable attempt to comply • Executed under penalty of perjury

  42. Statute of limitations • Civil tax cases: 3; 6; forever • Criminal tax cases: 6 years

  43. Extensions of the statute of limitations • Form 872: specific date • Form 872-a: extension until 90 days after • IRS mails 872-t or 90 days letter • IRS receives 872-t • Limited issue extension: • Appeals not allowed if < 180 days

  44. Stopping the statute of limitations • Mailing of 90 days letter • Submission of offer in compromise • T/P outside the USA for > 6 months • Filing amended return w/i 60 days of expiration extends for additional 60 days.

  45. Audit phase • Correspondence; office; field

  46. Examinations phase • Form 870 • 30 days letter: extended if exigency circumstances

  47. Appeals phase • Oral requests; brief written statement; protests • Form 870-AD

  48. Advantages of appeals • Review opportunity • Hazards of litigation • Exhaust administrative remedies • Revenue enhancement

  49. Disadvantages of appeals • “New issues” • Substantial grounds • Material tax liability • Time and expense • Relative finality of form 870-AD

  50. Assessment phase • Preceding condition to liens, levy or court proceedings • Levy • W/i 6 years of assessment • Administrative or Judicial • Sale • Redemption

More Related