1 / 6

Capacity Planning and Pricing Against a Low-Cost Competitor Appendix 13A

Capacity Planning and Pricing Against a Low-Cost Competitor Appendix 13A. Piedmont Airlines and People Express present a case study of the reaction to entry of a low-cost firm. Deregulation in 1979 permitted new entry

thaddeus-farrell
Télécharger la présentation

Capacity Planning and Pricing Against a Low-Cost Competitor Appendix 13A

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Capacity Planning and Pricing Against a Low-Cost CompetitorAppendix 13A • Piedmont Airlines and People Express present a case study of the reaction to entry of a low-cost firm. • Deregulation in 1979 permitted new entry • People Express was the first to enter the highly competitive airline industry. • Choice of 30-seat or 120-seat planes. 2005 South-Western Publishing

  2. Airline Strategy • People Express tried a strategy of a uniform low-price in the mid-Atlantic states in 1981. • They cut costs by adding seats and eliminating all 'frills'. Low cost flying would compete with driving. • People Express could enter with large or small scale planes • Should they use large scale or small scale, measured number of seats per planes? • Their decision would be based on what People Express thought would be the reaction of rival firms, particularly Piedmont Airline.

  3. Choices as a Decision Tree • Piedmont Airline could make would be either match the low price of People Express, or to accommodate them, keeping only the customers who like the 'frills' of full service. • This strategy game can be written as a decision tree. • The best final outcome (or subgame) being if People Express entered at large scale and Piedmont accommodated.

  4. Game Tree – A First Look Look at an expansion of the game, where the payoffs are given first for the People Express and second for Piedmont {People Express, Piedmont} per flight.. Choice of Piedmont is: Profit per flight {$4,236, $969} accommodate SMALLJET or to match price {$4,765, $969} People Express decision accommodate {$8,225, $3,877} BIG JET or to match price {$5,368, $2,068} Figure 13A.1 With this diagram, the end game for People Express is best when they enter with a big jet, whether or not Piedmont accommodates with a profit of $5,368 to $8,225 per flight.

  5. Game Tree – With Random Rationing When Piedmont matched prices for some flights, the incumbent firm tends to keep its customers. This changed the payoffs to the following ones. Choice of Piedmont is: Profit per flight {$6,979, $1,061} accommodate SMALLJET or to match price {$6,330, $0} People Express decision accommodate {$3,178. $4,244} BIG JET or to match price {$6,330, $0} Figure 13A.2 With this new diagram, the end game for People Express is best when they enter with a small jet, whether or not Piedmont accommodates. Unfortunately for People Express, they didn’t see the random discounting strategy that Piedmont actually took.

  6. Large Scale Entry Deterrence of a Low-Cost Competitor • As Piedmont was faced with more routes likely to compete with People Express, their decision tree became more complex. • People Express entered with large scale (120 seat planes). Piedmont matched their low price for some of their flights. But Piedmont, as the incumbent firm, tended to get most of the travelers to select Piedmont. • People Express did not see that passengers would tend to select the known firm, Piemont, when their prices were identical. • A price war ensued, and ultimately People Express lost too much money to continue operations.

More Related