1 / 24

Decreasing turnaround time in getting test results to patients. Performance Improvement Leadership Develop Program Unive

Decreasing turnaround time in getting test results to patients. Performance Improvement Leadership Develop Program University of Missouri – Columbia 2/18/2011. Team Members. Jacqueline Ruplinger, MD (Blue Team GM) Cynthia Twenter, LPN (Blue Team GM) Rosie Powell, PSR (Blue Team GM)

thane
Télécharger la présentation

Decreasing turnaround time in getting test results to patients. Performance Improvement Leadership Develop Program Unive

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Decreasing turnaround time in getting test results to patients.Performance Improvement Leadership Develop ProgramUniversity of Missouri – Columbia2/18/2011

  2. Team Members • Jacqueline Ruplinger, MD (Blue Team GM) • Cynthia Twenter, LPN (Blue Team GM) • Rosie Powell, PSR (Blue Team GM) • Anne Fitzsimmons, MD (Sponsor) • Tim Hogan, RRT, PhD (Advisor) • Carol Nierling, MS, RN (Advisor)

  3. Focus Area • Patients do not get their test results within the 5 day recommendation put forth by University Physicians • Getting test results to patients is done in a variety of ways and requires a lot of provider and staff time and resources

  4. Aim Statement Improve the notification process by which patients on blue team receive their test results. We want to decrease the time from the result getting to the provider’s inbox to the patient from >5days to <5days by 90% within 60days of implementation of Healthe and other outlined standardized/streamlined processes.

  5. Relationship to Strategic Goals of the Institution & our Department UP directive -the patient should receive test results within 5d 1-27-10 FM Departmental Policy -4-7-10 • Ordering provider will review all results both normal and abnormal • Normal and abnormal results will be communicated to the patient • Approved methods of communication were outlined: clinic visit, PC generated test result letter, lab card with electronic documentation that it was done and sent, phone call-either by provider or nurse* (guidelines as to when a nurse should call outlined)

  6. Project Timeline

  7. Process Flow Chart for a Provider • Provider steps to generate a lab letter to a patient • 21 clicks • 1 min 43 secs • With Healthe • 6 clicks • 40 secs

  8. Process Flowchart for a Nurse • Nurse sends “nl” pap letter for provider • 43 clicks • 4 min Standardizing “nl” pap letters saves steps

  9. Process Flow Chart for a PSR • Process for mailing a letter • 25 clicks • 4-5 min Utilizing see-through envelopes saves steps and eliminates errors

  10. Fishbone Diagram

  11. Stakeholders • Patients • Providers-residents and attending physicians • Staff-phone nurses, PSRs & floor nurses • Care coordinator-Joan Asbee • Lab/radiology • Cerner staff

  12. Baseline data

  13. Baseline Data cont. • One providers experience to endorse and make lab letters on 14 patients -37min to do 14 letters -238 clicks (Note this does not include the time it takes for the nurse or PSR to process the letter and mail the letter, this would add an additional 63 min)

  14. Interventions Considered • Electronic Approach-Healthe • Phone approach-standardize times when providers would ask the nurse to call patients* • Standardization of workflow processes-letters, envelopes • Request input from patients how they would like to hear about their test results *already outlined by our department April 2010

  15. Measurements • Time it took for patients to get test results • Time it takes to process letters to patients • Time for the letter to get through the mail • Patients perception pre and post intervention

  16. Outcomes to Date

  17. Patient Feedback N=36

  18. Workflow Change

  19. Anticipated ROI/ Benefits Realized • Using the electronic approach to communicate test results to pts -541 physician hrs/yr in time saved -867 staff hours/yr saved -$5,200 saved in postage • Workflow processes streamlined • Secondary benefits of Healthe • Eliminated wrong letter to wrong pt All increases pt, staff and provider satisfaction

  20. Lessons Learned • It took much longer to get Healthe going • Pts did not register as quickly as we anticipated • When the “create” button lights up in “results to endorse” that does not mean the pt has registered • FU after an intervention is very important • Improvement work takes people with different backgrounds and skill sets • There are a lot of tools available and IT’s FUN!

  21. Future Steps • Continue the momentum in enrolling pts • Focus on the FU surveys before rolling out to the rest of Green Meadows • Share our findings/experiences at team mtgs • Present our findings at a Colwill seminar • Cont. to look at all the test result processes • Integrate PDSA in our daily routine-meet monthly

  22. Summary • By implementation of an electronic way of communicating results to patients greatly reduced turnaround time and did not take more provider or staff time • Standardizing how results get to patients and creating form letters & utilizing see-through envelopes also decreased waiting times

  23. Summary Service People Finance Quality Growth Community

  24. Questions?

More Related