1 / 16

Recirculating chiller (-10 degrees)

Stereo photography of bubbles Three triggers: acoustic, pressure and video. Safety shield box. Glass dewar. Propylene glycol buffer liquid prevents evaporation of superheated liquid. 3-way valve. Cameras. Superheated CF 3 Br. Glass dewar with heat-exchange fluid.

thanos
Télécharger la présentation

Recirculating chiller (-10 degrees)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stereo photography of bubbles Three triggers: acoustic, pressure and video Safety shield box Glass dewar Propylene glycol buffer liquid prevents evaporation of superheated liquid. 3-way valve Cameras Superheated CF3Br Glass dewar with heat-exchange fluid Recirculating chiller (-10 degrees) Camera (1 of 2) Quartz pressure vessel Piston Acoustic sensor First prototypes: ~20 ml active volume Pressure: 0-150 psi Temp: -80 to + 40 degrees C UoM HEP seminar

  2. UoM HEP seminar

  3. A Typical Scattering Event with Am-Be Neutron Source (bubble expansion ~1 mm/ms) X Camera Y Camera UoM HEP seminar

  4. P. Reinke, Exp. Heat Transf. 10 (1997) 133 Can Bubble Chambers be made stable enough? SEE -> Old Bubble Chambers radiation-ready for only few ms at a time (coincident with beam spill) Gas pockets in surface imperfections and motes can act as inhomogeneous nucleation centers. A BC dedicated to WIMP searches must remain superheated indefinitely, except for radiation-induced events. Low degree of superheat helps, but is not enough. Recent progress in neutralization of inhomogeneous nucleation sites (from work unrelated to bubble chambers!). E.g. use of liquid “lid”, outgassing in presence of buffer liquid, cleaning techniques and wetting improvement via vapor deposition. UoM HEP seminar

  5. Background Counting Rate at ~ 6 m.w.e. • Mean survival time for superheated state varies due to periodic episodes of nucleation on chamber walls, but is usually ~ 10 minutes. • Live time (due to long recompression cycle) is already 62%. • Counting rate for “real events” is 4/hour (compatible with measured fast neutron flux in the lab). • Intrinsic gamma rejection factor (from absence of excess nucleation rate in presence of Y-88  1.3E6 g interactions / s) is  1E9 ( 14C not a concern even at the multiton level) Bonner sphere(s) n flux measurement in LASR underground lab UoM HEP seminar

  6. Background Counting Rate at ~ 6 m.w.e. • Mean survival time for superheated state varies due to periodic episodes of nucleation on chamber walls, but is usually ~ 10 minutes. • Live time (due to long recompression cycle) is already 62%. • Counting rate for “real events” is 4/hour (compatible with measured fast neutron flux in the lab). • Intrinsic gamma rejection factor (from absence of excess nucleation rate in presence of Y-88  1.3E6 g interactions / s) is  1E9 ( 14C not a concern even at the multiton level) UoM HEP seminar

  7. Well-defined low energy threshold Sensitivity to < 7 keV recoils demonstrated (while having no response to 3mCi gsource). In agreement with models. Sensitivity to ~1 keV recoils in progress (Sb-124/Be source) Further studies in progress (efficiency, sharpness of threshold, disentanglement of I and F response). Lines show Seitz model prediction for top boundary of data point distribution (onset of sensitivity during decompression) CF3Br data (CF3I in progress and looking good) Detector is insensitive to gammas (see previous transparency) yet fully responsive to low-E recoils UoM HEP seminar

  8. Fancy: Position Reconstruction • Bubble positions can be reconstructed in 3 dimensions by scanning images taken • by two cameras offset by 90 degrees. • Position resolution is currently 530 microns r.m.s. (approximately 1/4 bubble diameter) • Uniform spatial distribution of background events, consistent with background neutrons. 163 background events (1.5 live days) intermediate step in automatic inspection algorithm using NI Vision Development Module (2 kg chamber) UoM HEP seminar

  9. Neutron Background Rejection Potential • Multiple simultaneous bubbles are present in • ~4% of events in our “background” data set. • Neutrons can do this, WIMPs cannot. • The response to neutrons and WIMPs interacting • mostly via SI is very different for refrigerants • containing F only (C3F8) and F+I (CF3I); more favorable situation than Ge/Si to verify a WIMP signal (generally speaking) UoM HEP seminar

  10. Meet COUPP (2 kg CF3I target, installation at 300 m.w.e. (FNAL) Jan. 2005) • Central design issue is how to avoid metal contact with superheated liquid. • Bellows mechanism compensates pressure inside and outside of inner • vessel in present design UoM HEP seminar

  11. Meet COUPP (2 kg CF3I target, installation at 300 m.w.e. (FNAL) Jan. 2005) • Central design issue is how to avoid metal contact with superheated liquid. • Bellows mechanism compensates pressure inside and outside of inner • vessel in present design UoM HEP seminar

  12. Meet COUPP (2 kg CF3I target, installation at 300 m.w.e. (FNAL) Jan. 2005) • Central design issue is how to avoid metal contact with superheated liquid. • Bellows mechanism compensates pressure inside and outside of inner • vessel in present design triple n-induced nucleations in 2 kg CF3I movie available from http://cfcp.uchicago.edu/~collar/triple_bubble(0.4s).mov UoM HEP seminar

  13. UoM HEP seminar

  14. Can be made to operate like a “regular” BC muon tracks visible at high degrees of superheat UoM HEP seminar

  15. COUPP (Chicagoland Observatory for Underground Particle Physics)Where we might be by end of 2005 with 2 kg. Take these with a grain of salt) ~latest CDMS are these projections overly cautious? Better safe than sorry (e.g., alpha backgrounds from Rn emanation from steel - however only few mBq/m2 expected if some precautions taken - The inner chamber is a closed system to Rn penetration) UoM HEP seminar

  16. COUPP (Chicagoland Observatory for Underground Particle Physics)Where we might be by end of 2005 with 2 kg. Take these with a grain of salt) ~latest CDMS are these projections overly cautious? Better safe than sorry (e.g., alpha backgrounds from Rn emanation from steel - however only few mBq/m2 expected if some precautions taken - The inner chamber is a closed system to Rn penetration) UoM HEP seminar

More Related