1 / 63

FDA Advisory Committee January 13, 2003

FDA Advisory Committee January 13, 2003. Genzyme Marketing Application STN 103979 / 0 Recombinant human  -Galactosidase For Treatment of Fabry Disease. Agalsidase beta: Proposed indication and dose. Proposed indication: “..indicated for use as a long-term enzyme replacement..”

thao
Télécharger la présentation

FDA Advisory Committee January 13, 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FDA Advisory CommitteeJanuary 13, 2003 Genzyme Marketing Application STN 103979 / 0 Recombinant human -Galactosidase For Treatment of Fabry Disease

  2. Agalsidase beta: Proposed indication and dose • Proposed indication: “..indicated for use as a long-term enzyme replacement..” • Proposed dose: 1 mg/kg IV every other week • Approval requested under Accelerated Approval framework

  3. Order of topics • Fabry Disease overview • Overview of clinical development of agalsidase beta • Highlights of notable study results • Overview of accelerated approval • Description of proposal for modification of verification trial • Review of historical data set and proposed analysis

  4. Fabry Disease • X-linked deficiency of alpha-Galactosidase • Mostly males affected • Pathophysiology: accumulation of substrate • Many cell types involved • Early manifestations pain and paresthesias, angiokeratomas, hypohydrosis, ocular opacities • Primary morbidity and mortality vascular: renal, cardiac, neurologic • No approved treatment; only palliation • Orphan disease population

  5. Overview of clinical trials

  6. FB9702: Design • 15 males with Fabry Disease • 0.3-3.0 mg/kg, given q2 or q14 days for 5 doses • Histological scores on biopsies of liver, skin, heart, and kidney • PK, safety outcomes

  7. FB9702: Results • Liver histology: insufficient data • Skin, heart, and kidney histology • Reductions in capillary endothelial GL-3 for available paired biopsies • Reductions not seen in all cell types examined • Total GL-3 levels reduced in most organ biopsies • Plasma GL-3 levels fell in all groups • PK • Clinical efficacy not observed • Infusion reactions occurred

  8. AGAL-002: Design • Double-blind • 58 subjects randomized 1:1 to placebo or agalsidase beta for 5 months • Dose of product: 1 mg/kg every other week • Objectives: activity and safety • Subjects • No renal insufficiency (serum creatinine  2.2) • Evaluations • Baseline and end-of-trial biopsies • Kidney, skin, and heart • Clinical laboratory and antibodies

  9. AGAL-002: Endpoints • Primary endpoint: Renal capillary endothelium histology • Blinded evaluations; pathologists trained • Initial reading • Subsequent re-reading of low-score slides • Endpoint analysis: comparison of number of subjects with a score of 0 at the end of the trial • Secondary endpoints: • Pain • GL-3 histology composite • Kidney, skin, and heart capillary endothelium • Total GL-3 levels in urine and kidney

  10. AGAL-002: Conduct • Protocol changes • Site enrollment • 8 sites (Mt. Sinai with 20 subjects) • No discontinuations • Treatment assignment errors • 4 reversals of treatment at one site • 2 subjects at another site with reversal of treatment after 3rd dose • Adherence to dosing excellent

  11. AGAL-002: Demographics and baseline characteristics • Well balanced for age, weight, height, plasma alpha-Gal and GL-3, years of symptoms, blood type (B, non-B) • Only 2 females, both in agalsidase beta group • About 90% “White” in both groups

  12. AGAL-002: Results • Primary endpoint: kidney histology score • Comparison of number of 0-scores • p < 0.001

  13. AGAL-002: Results • Important supportive analyses by Genzyme • Consistency of pathologists in scoring • Trial site • Age; ethnicity and gender • Capillary scoring criterion on individual slides • CBER analyses • Quartiles of baseline plasma and kidney GL-3 • Summary : primary endpoint result robust

  14. AGAL-002: Results • Secondary endpoints • McGill pain questionnaire—no effect • Skin and heart capillary endothelium – number with scores of 0

  15. AGAL-002: Results • Secondary endpoints (cont’d) • Urinary GL-3 • Results inconclusive • Kidney GL-3 (median reduction): • 34% agalsidase beta • 6% placebo • GFR • No difference between groups • Serum creatinine: • No change from baseline for either group

  16. AGAL-002: Results • Antibody development • Occurred in 24/29 treated subjects • Pharmacokinetics • Small amount of data suggests decrease in enzyme exposure with highest antibody titers

  17. AGAL-002: Results • Safety • No deaths • Serious adverse events show no pattern • Infusion-related events chief concern • 16/29 agalsidase treated, 0 placebo • 12/16 with suspected hypersensitivity • No factors predict susceptibility • Nonserious adverse events show no concerning pattern

  18. AGAL-002: Conclusions • AGAL-002 is the largest controlled experience of agalsidase beta to date • Primary endpoint showed robust effect on renal endothelium histology • No differences between groups on clinical efficacy outcomes • Infusion reactions common, sometimes severe • Antibody reactivity common

  19. AGAL-005: Single arm, open-label treatment extension to AGAL-002 • 1 mg/kg every other week • All subjects from AGAL-002 • Procedures • Kidney, heart, and skin biopsy at 6 months • Additional skin biopsy at 12 and 18 months and yearly thereafter • Principal effect measurement: kidney histologically determined GL-3 • Serum and urine labs, antibodies, clinical status, safety determined

  20. Open-label extension treatment: Results Numbers of subjects with scores of 0 in capillary endothelium at 6 months of the extension

  21. Requests & responses to first review cycle • Initial FDA Review Letter (Dec. 2000) • Acknowledged evidence of effect on endothelial cells • Raised concern if surrogate was likely to predict clinical benefit • Renal function not affected during study; possibility of years of treatment needed before benefit seen • Histologic findings not uniform across cell types; certain cell types in kidney, skin, and heart did not show reduction in accumulation

  22. Requests & responses to first review cycle • Infusion reaction information limited • Some reactions severe • Possibility of increase in frequency or severity with duration of use • Insufficient basis to predict susceptibility • Development of antibodies widespread • Potential for diminution of histological effect • Possibly prior to clinical benefit • Potential ongoing safety risk • 6 month data from extension study do not alleviate concern for long-term use

  23. Requests & responses to first review cycle • Concerns regarding Verification Study • Adequacy of powering • Feasibility to complete • Complete response to CR letter received from Genzyme (April, 2001)

  24. Extension trial histology: 6 months • Histology on additional cell types Number of subjects with scores of 0 (only among those with non-0 baseline score)

  25. Extension trial histology: 6 months • Podocytes and mesangial cell matrix: no notable effect • Noncapillary smooth muscle cells • No subjects with scores of 0, but >77% had a decrease in score from baseline • Distal convoluted tubules/collecting ducts • From 67% (placebo crossovers) to 50% (agal beta continuers) of subjects had a decrease in score

  26. Extension trial histology: 18 months Skin superficial and deep capillary endothelial cell scores at 18 months

  27. Long-term skin histology-skin superficial capillary endothelium Five subjects with non-0 month 18 scores

  28. Open-label extension: Additional results • Renal endpoints • GFR and serum creatinine (18 months) no change in either group • Urinary GL-3 (6 months): inconclusive • Plasma GL-3 (12-months) • Decreased in crossover group (15.3 to 0.6 ng/ml) • Remained low in continuer group (2.3 to 1.4 ng/ml) • Antibody development (18 months) • 25/28 crossovers seroconverted • 3 continuers seroconverted during the extension

  29. Open-label extension: Safety results • 1 death • Serious adverse events • Biopsy, miscellaneous, infusional, and cardiac/neurological • Other adverse events • Infusional • 34/58 subjects in the 1st 6 months • Decrease in frequency with time • 3 withdrawals for the development of IgE • No pattern of other toxicities

  30. Open-label extension: Conclusions • Biopsy data in placebo crossovers confirm the short-term results from AGAL-002 • Despite widespread antibody development, histological effects, GFR, and serum creatinine appear to be stable • Infusion reactions wane in frequency, do not disappear with time

  31. AGAL-007 • Open-label trial of 13 males with Fabry Disease; same duration and dose of treatment as AGAL-002 • Bioactivity data results • Endothelial cell score 0 in nearly all subjects • Podocytes, mesangial cell matrix no change • Other cell types • Reductions consistent with AGAL-002 • No change in renal function • No change in sweating, abdominal pain • Antibody: 11/13 seroconversions

  32. Additional safety data • Data base • AGAL-006 (15 subjects) • AGAL-007 (13 subjects) • AGAL-008 : ongoing, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (deaths, SAE only available) • Events • 5 deaths consistent with vasculopathy; 1 sepsis • Serious adverse events • cardiac/neurologic, infusional, and other

  33. Summary of safety and efficacy • Histology results are robust, not isolated, but not uniform; stable to antibody formation • No treatment effect observed on clinical efficacy assessments including pain or on renal function • Antibody development nearly universal • Severe infusion reactions may occur; no predictive factor; IgE development occurs, some diminution in frequency of infusion reactions

  34. Accelerated Approval • § 601.40 Scope • Applies to biological products studied for safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening illnesses and that provide meaningful therapeutic benefit to patients over existing treatments.

  35. Accelerated Approval • § 601.41 Approval based on a surrogate endpoint. • FDA may grant marketing approval on the basis of: • Adequate and well-controlled clinical trials • Establishing an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely, based on epidemiologic, therapeutic, pathophysiologic, or other evidence, to predict clinical benefit

  36. Accelerated Approval • § 601.41 Approval based on a surrogate endpoint. • Approval carries requirement to study product further • To verify and describe its clinical benefit • Postmarketing studies would usually be studies already underway. • Such studies must also be adequate and well-controlled. • Such studies shall be carried out with due diligence.

  37. Accelerated Approval • § 601.43 Withdrawal procedures. • (a) For biological products approved under § 601.40, FDA may withdraw approval, following a hearing … if: • (1) A postmarketing clinical study fails to verify clinical benefit • (2) The applicant fails to perform the required postmarketing study with due diligence

  38. Verification trial AGAL-008 • Currently fully enrolled • Design • Double-blind, placebo-controlled • Subjects must have renal impairment • Endpoint composite of 1st occurrence any of • Serum creatinine 33% rise or need for dialysis • MI, new symptomatic arrhythmia, unstable angina, new or worsening heart failure • New stroke, TIA • Primary endpoint: comparison of rate of composite event

  39. Proposal for conversion of verification trial • Convert placebo-controlled trial to an open-label trial • Each subject continues for 3 years or to endpoint event • Historical data as comparator

  40. Historical control data collection • Protocol AGAL-014: Historical data collection • Objective: generate event rate for the historical population • Sites asked to enroll, patients consented • Data collection focused upon renal function and adverse events, cardiac adverse events, neurologic adverse events • Collection of demographics and characteristics

  41. Historical control: “Qualified” data set • Establishment of “qualified” data set • For each patient, determine if there is a date at which the patient would qualify as a subject for AGAL-008 • Use data starting at the time of qualification • Data for “qualified” set stop when patient receives agalsidase or has renal, cardiac or neurologic adverse event (endpoint event) • “Qualified” data will often not include all collected creatinine values for each patient

  42. Historical control: “Qualified” data set • 27 / 51 sites agreed to participate • Patient participation • Based on interim review of screening logs • 58% of patients agreed to participate • Complete study included 447 subjects • 103 patients included in “qualified” data

  43. Historical control: Failure to “qualify” • Reasons for patients to fail to provide data to “qualified” data set (447 total patients)

  44. Historical control: demographics and characteristics *estimated

  45. Characteristics of “qualified” dataset • Among 103 “qualified” patients: • Number of creatinine values per patient • 18 patients with only 1 creatinine value • 22 patients with only 2 creatinine values • 63 patients with 3 or more creatinine values • Duration of followup • Median period of followup 1.4 years • 41 patients with 1 month or less

  46. Historical creatinine data: Examples

  47. Historical creatinine data: Examples (continued)

  48. Historical creatinine data: Examples (continued)

  49. Historical creatinine data: Examples (continued)

  50. Historical dataset • Proposed use of historical data • Objective: provide quantitative comparison to data from revised-design Study 008 • Define new primary endpoint for revised Study 008: Comparison of percentage of patients with 50% or higher rise in creatinine within 3 years of starting enzyme treatment

More Related