1 / 13

Analysis of polar o rganic compouds in size resolved aerosol by Py-GC-MS and derivatisation GC-MS

Analysis of polar o rganic compouds in size resolved aerosol by Py-GC-MS and derivatisation GC-MS. A ndrás Hoffer Max Planck Institute for Chemistry Mainz In cooperation with András Gelencsér, Marianne Blaz só. Objectives.

thomas-heath
Télécharger la présentation

Analysis of polar o rganic compouds in size resolved aerosol by Py-GC-MS and derivatisation GC-MS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analysis of polar organic compouds in size resolved aerosol by Py-GC-MS and derivatisation GC-MS András Hoffer Max Planck Institute for Chemistry Mainz In cooperation with András Gelencsér, Marianne Blazsó

  2. Objectives • Identification and quantitative determination of polar organiccompounds in aerosol extracts by derivatisation GC-MS (Mainz) • - from all filter samples (including backup) • - from MOUDI samples for the most abundant compounds • Method has been established but • speciation to be supported by GC chemical ionisation MS and GC-HRMS on selected samples (Hungary) • Direct structural characterisation of bulk organic aerosol by on-line derivatisation Py-GC-MS (Hungary) • - qualitative but yields information on HULIS / polyacids as well • - relative ratios of pyrolysis products may be used for source apportionment (see Blazsó et al. JAAP)

  3. Derivatisation Py-GC-MS methodology Instrumentation: Pyroprobe 2000 GC Agilent 6890 / MS 5973 (EI) (quadrupole) • pyrolysis: flash, 400°C, 20s • derivatisation reagents: TMAH 10 l, TBAH, BSTFA • GC column: HP5MS 0.32 x 30 m 0.25 m • temperature program: • 50°C 1 min - 10°C/min 300°C hold 5min • - identification: Wiley 275 spectrum library • - sample need: spot of 0.3 cm2

  4. Abundance 1400000 HV19 (burning period) 1200000 1000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 Time--> Abundance HV71 (transition period) 1400000 1200000 1000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 Time--> Py-GC-MS with TMAH

  5. 43 (39) compoundstentatively identified • Major compound classes: • Monocarboxylic including fatty acids • (C6-C28) • most abundant n-C16 • few unsaturated compounds (C18:1) • Dicarboxylic acids • (butanedioic acid, pentanedioic acid, • methyl-butanedioic acid, 2-butenedioic acid) • Aromatic compounds • di-, tri- hydroxy benzene and benzoic acids • and/or methoxybenzoic acids and derivatives • (TBAH derivatisation required) Identified compounds

  6. - Anhydrosugars/sugars(levoglucosan) • n-alkanes (C23-C28) • The relative amount of the aromatic compounds to the levoglucosan are • higher (1.3 - 5) in the burning period compare to the transition period • Some aromatic compounds (coumaryl compound) are missing from the transition period sample • burning p eriod transition period • C/G=1.09 • S/G=0.65 S/G=0.9 • grass and softwood origin hardwood burning

  7. Abundance 4.5e+07 HV19 (burning period) 3.5e+07 2.5e+07 1.5e+07 5000000 0 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 Time--> Abundance 2e+07 HV71 transition period 1.6e+07 1.2e+07 8000000 4000000 0 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 Time--> Py-GC-MS with BSTFA

  8. Similar compound classes were identified as in the TMAH-treated sample. • The identified aromatic compounds where the same as in previous • mesurements made with water extraction. • The relative amount of the aromatic compounds is higher in the • burning period (1.4-5.5). Identified compounds Derivatisation with TBAH Hydrolysis of high MW compounds  mostly methoxy guaiacyl syringyl units can be identified (compare to Graham et al.) several aromatic hydroxy compounds in aqueous extract

  9. GC-MS measurements Instrumentation: GC Fisons 8000 / MS Trio 1000 (EI, quadrupol) • - GC column: SPB5 0.32mm x 30 m 0.25 m • temperature program: • 50°C 1 min 10°C/min 300°C hold 5min • - sample need:~6cm2 • Sample preparation • Extract in ACN (6cm3, 1h) • Derivatised with PFBHA (O-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl) hydroxy amine • after drying with BSTFA

  10. Ion fragments EI : m/z=73, 75 [Si(CH3)3]+, [OH=Si(CH3)2]·+ relative intensity: (20-100%) m/z =117 [COOSi(CH3)3]·+ monocarboxylic acids relative intensity: 61-97% (except aromatic carboxylic acids) and strong M-15 as well m/z= 147 [(CH3)2Si=OSi(CH3)3]·+ 2 active H-atoms relative intensity: ~100% m/z= 181 [C6F6CH2]+ carbonyl groups relative intensity 50-100% /Yu et al. 1998/

  11. 181 147 117

  12. Planned time schedule of the work • Identification of individual compound is underway • The identified compounds will be confirmed by standards • Quantification will be performed in SIM with internal • standard method - Identification of individual compounds: end of March - Quantitative analysis: end of August - Data evaluation and writing papers: September -

More Related