1 / 18

DEEP SCLERECTOMY WITH A NONREABSORBABLE HEMA IMPLANT

DEEP SCLERECTOMY WITH A NONREABSORBABLE HEMA IMPLANT. 5th IGS April 2005 Cape Town. Dr. .J Loscos Dra. M.A Parera Prof. J de la Cámara. H.Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona Spain. Non ionic polymer (2-hydroxietilmetacrilate) Low tendency to protein adherence

tia
Télécharger la présentation

DEEP SCLERECTOMY WITH A NONREABSORBABLE HEMA IMPLANT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DEEP SCLERECTOMY WITH ANONREABSORBABLE HEMA IMPLANT 5th IGS April 2005 Cape Town Dr. .J Loscos Dra. M.A Parera Prof. J de la Cámara H.Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona Spain

  2. Non ionic polymer (2-hydroxietilmetacrilate) • Low tendency to protein adherence • 25% of water • Not reabsorbable

  3. Patients and Methods • 70 eyes ( 62 patients) • 35 males / 35 females • Mean Age: 68.5 years • Uncontrolled glaucoma under maximal tolerable medical treatment

  4. Patients and Methods:Diagnosis

  5. Patients and Methods: • Preop IOP <16 mmhg…………. 0 eyes 16-21 mmhg……….. 13 eyes >21 mmhg………….. 57 eyes • Preop Medication • 1 …………………….. 10 eyes • 2……………………… 29 eyes • 3……………………… 28 eyes • 3 + diamox ……… 3 eyes

  6. Surgical technique • Fornix- based conjuntival flap • Superficial escleral flap 5 x 5 mm • Mitomycin-C : 0,01% ; t = 3’ • Suture HEMA implant in scleral bed with • 10/0 nylon sutures • Suture scleral flap with 1 sutures • Closure conjunctiva

  7. UBM

  8. Early complications • Hyphema : 5 • Seidel : 3 • Coroidal detachment:3 • Anterior chamber shallowing:1 • Hipotony:6

  9. Late complications • Subconjunctival fibrosis : 2 • Isquemic bleb: 2

  10. Goniopuncture • 9 patients ( 18 %) • - 1 month : 1 • - 6 month: 8 • Mean time : 5.4 month • -Mean IOP decrease : 4.13 mmHg

  11. Postoperative follow-up

  12. Postoperative follow-up

  13. Postoperative follow-up:12 months • 50 eyes: • IOP preop: 26.2mmhg IOP postop: 17mmhg • Nº preop med:134 Nº postop med: 18 • Mean preop med: 2.6 Mean postop med:0.36

  14. Conclusion - QUALIFIED SUCCES RATE ( IOP< 21 mmHg with / without medication ) - 88% - COMPLET SUCCESS RATE (IOP < 21 mmHg without medication) - 68%

  15. Conclusion • HEMA implant is safety and effective in • control IOP • - Few postoperative complications • Further studies to compare efficiency • with other implants

  16. Thank you

More Related