1 / 12

Splinternet versus open Internet

Splinternet versus open Internet. Policy recommendations for the American position in international Internet governance negotiations Luke Wadman, IEEE-WISE intern July 31 st , 2013 Rayburn HOB Room 2325. Coming soon, to a PowerPoint near you.

tien
Télécharger la présentation

Splinternet versus open Internet

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Splinternetversus open Internet Policy recommendations for the American position in international Internet governance negotiations Luke Wadman, IEEE-WISE intern July 31st, 2013 Rayburn HOB Room 2325

  2. Coming soon, to a PowerPoint near you • What is the Internet, and what does it mean to govern it? • What are the issues? What’s at stake? • The policy routes • Recommendations Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet

  3. Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet Source: Qmee.com

  4. Internet governance – a briefer introduction • Definition: ”Internet governance is the development and application by Governments, the private sector and civil society, in their respective roles, of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programmes that shape the evolution and use of the Internet.” • In English, please! Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet

  5. More Internet governance: models • Two models: multistakeholder and cybersovereignty • Multistakeholder: current model, represents civil society, private sector, government equally • Cybersovereignty: Government have final say, civil society and private sector serve as advisors • Multistakeholder: current, “open” Internet • versus • Cybersovereignty: government borders, Splinternet Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet

  6. The Splinternet is here – in China • China ISPs are large and infrastructure robust  some international traffic routed through China (mostly S. Korea, Thailand, Singapore) • Can result in traffic/service interruptions • If you’re an international IT company, bad for business! • Also bad for user experience: making international calls with phone vs. Internet Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet

  7. Let’s talk about PRISM…not Snowden, please! • Impacts of PRISM/Verizon metadata collection go beyond privacy concerns in US • Diplomatic and international repercussions if trust over the Internet is broken – it’s all based on trust! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Side_of_the_Moon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(surveillance_program) Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet

  8. Current policy/reactions • US House: HR 1580, AKA Affirm the policy of the United States regarding Internet governance • Similar measures taken up by previous Congresses • More policy action needs to be taken ahead of International negotiations in 2014, 2015 Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet

  9. Policy Alternatives • #1: Status quo (currently in play) • Stay the course, free Internet, sit on our cyber hands • Pro: Keep Internet open and free • Con: Ignore the holes in the message/leave us open to criticism on US control of Internet • #2: Enhance official cyber relations • Cyber Policy office in White House, to work on domestic policy issues and solid position • Cybers Affairs bureau in State, to take position to international negotiations, be better prepared • Pro: Stronger focus on good position, less hypocrisy than #1 • Con: Appears heavy handed, costs $ Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet

  10. More Policy Alternatives • #3: More power to the people! • Engage civil society in stakeholder process further, allow for more transparency and access. • Make the average user care! Easier said than done. • More transparency and separation between US intelligence operations and Internet – right now, doesn’t look great • Pro: Preferred by most users, who drive Internet economy • Con: Feasible? Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet

  11. Policy Recommendation • Blend of #2, and #3 • Build up official channels for bringing focused, reasonable model of multistakeholder to Internet governance discussions • Allow users more control of data and utilize more open-sourced model for Internet structures & rules • Support movements like Amash amendment. More care about privacy  more respect on international Internet • Advantage: Happier users = better support of model being taken into international negotiation = ensuring open Internet in the future • Problems: needs money to function, but not too much. Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet

  12. Questions? http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/moving.png Lucas Wadman, IEEE-WISE, Splinternet vs. Open Internet

More Related