1 / 9

Government Reactions to Monopolies

Government Reactions to Monopolies. Economics 2/7/12. Why should government intervene?. As discussed earlier, monopolies produce too little and charge too much. Nobody is in a position to stop a monopoly except for the government.

tierra
Télécharger la présentation

Government Reactions to Monopolies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Government Reactions to Monopolies Economics 2/7/12

  2. Why should government intervene? • As discussed earlier, monopolies produce too little and charge too much. • Nobody is in a position to stop a monopoly except for the government. • That is, unless the government is the one causing the monopoly in the first place. • Then they should just gtfo of the way.

  3. What can governments do? • In order to stop monopolies from profiting from a loss to society, government can: • Set quotas to guarantee sufficient production • Set price ceilings to limit price gouging • Subsidize another competing company • Forcibly split the monopoly into two or more competing companies • Steal (I mean, “nationalize”) the company, making it belong to the government and pay all profits to the government coffers.

  4. Why don’t they do these things all the time? • Every action the government takes to intervene in a market has a cost. • Sometimes, the cost of government intervention outweighs the cost of letting the monopoly be.

  5. Price and Quantity controls • If the government sets a price and quantity for a monopoly, it might improve the situation then… • However, the government would have to set new prices and quantities every time something shifted either the supply or demand curve. • Governments can’t even know for sure if they’re setting the right price in the first place, let alone after market shocks constantly change the picture.

  6. Subsidies to Competitors • Obviously, the government loses money equal to the amount it pays to subsidize the competition. • Also, after the subsidized company gets going, it will become an even stronger monopoly than the old one because it’s getting a subsidy • The government has a horrible track record of taking subsidies away later, because the company will use the some of the subsidy money to buy politicians. Endless cycle.

  7. Forcibly Dividing Monopolies • Dividing a company into multiple other companies forces it to compete against what used to be itself. • The new companies may be less efficient than the old one was – neither may make as much profit, but that may be due to stupidly increased costs. • It feels like a violation of somebody’s property (and therefore the constitution) to take half of his company and give it away to somebody else.

  8. Government take-over • When the government “nationalizes” (read: steals) a monopoly, it is possible that they will think about The People more than profits. • Also, any profits they make theoretically go to “The People” • Unfortunately, government companies let profits fall, but they also let quality suffer. • Also, government take-overs of the most profitable corporations discourage people form investing in that country for fear of theft.

  9. Conclusion: • Government actions are often necessary to prevent a monopoly from hurting society. • However, government actions carry their own costs, so we must be very judicious in deciding when and how government should intervene.

More Related