1 / 8

WP7 – Metadata Standards Development

WP7 – Metadata Standards Development. C-G Hjelm. ”New” problems. When the application for DwB was written the discussion was about metadata standards – this is not the case today

tierra
Télécharger la présentation

WP7 – Metadata Standards Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WP7 – Metadata Standards Development C-G Hjelm

  2. ”New” problems • When the application for DwB was written the discussion was about metadata standards – this is not the case today • Why are there in some countries a good relation between the NSI and the DA ? – Mainly regarding the metadata for the country • Metadata for (longitudinal) administrative registers, (Linked) Open Data and “Big Data” in research

  3. What's in common and that’s not in common ? NSI’s Researchers Common ground Data Archives External demands and needs

  4. What type of metadata are needed ? • NSI and metadata – production of statistics (and in some countries support to researchers) • Data Archive and metadata– often only at the end of a project • Researchers and metadata – for the specified project

  5. European social science infrastructure needs • Other European infrastructure projects (without any order) • CLARIN • DARIAH • DASISH • iCORDI • CESSDA • OpenAIRE • … and many more …

  6. Meeting at IASSIST between: • NSI’s • Data Archives • Researchers

  7. Questions to discuss • What’s the needs in terms of metadata from a researchers point of view • What’s the lowest common denominator in terms of metadata between these three groups • Are there any (parts of) standards today that is enough? • The common ground between the tree groups

  8. Forms for the meeting and the forward process • Meeting face-to-face at IASSIST • Mail contact and preliminary report writing • Preliminary report for review

More Related