1 / 18

16 March 2006 Shinji FUJINO Director International Standards & MRA Policy Office

Mutual Acceptance of Conformity Assessment Results - Japan ’ s Experience and Observation -. 16 March 2006 Shinji FUJINO Director International Standards & MRA Policy Office Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) JAPAN. Mutual Recognition Referred in TBT Agreement (1).

tiffanyperez
Télécharger la présentation

16 March 2006 Shinji FUJINO Director International Standards & MRA Policy Office

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mutual Acceptance of Conformity Assessment Results - Japan’s Experience and Observation - 16 March 2006 Shinji FUJINO Director International Standards & MRA Policy Office Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) JAPAN

  2. Mutual Recognition Referred in TBT Agreement (1) • Article 6.1 ……Members shall ensure, whenever possible, that results of conformity assessment procedures in other Members are accepted, even when those procedures differ from their own, provided they are satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to their own procedures. ……

  3. Mutual Recognition Referred in TBT Agreement (2) • Article 6.3 Members are encouraged, at the request of other Members, to be willing to enter into negotiations for the conclusion of agreements for the mutual recognition of results of each other’s conformity assessment procedures. Members may require that such agreements fulfil the criteria of paragraph 1 and give mutual satisfaction regarding their potential for facilitating trade in the products concerned.

  4. Traditional Mutual Recognition [JPN-EU/SGP] Government B Government A Acceptance Certificate Certificate Designation in accordance with the technical Regulations and procedure of country B Designation in accordance with the technical Regulations and procedure of country A CABs in Country B CABs in Country A Conformity Assessment in accordance withthetechnical Regulations of country B Conformity Assessment in accordance withthetechnical Regulations of country A < Equivalent >

  5. Mutual Recognition Agreement with the EU • Took Effect on January 2002 • Areas Covered ; • Electrical Products • Telecommunications Terminal Equipment and Radio Equipment • GLP for Chemicals • GMP for Medicinal Products • Registered Conformity Assessment Bodies & Certification • Electrical products Telecom equipment • Japan 1 CAB, 37 Certifications 0 • E U 0 2 CABs, • about 580 Certifications

  6. Mutual Recognition Agreement with Singapore • Took Effect on November 2002 • Areas Covered ; • Electrical Products • Telecommunications Terminal Equipment and Radio Equipment • Registered Conformity Assessment Bodies & Certification • Electrical products Telecom equipment • Japan 1 CAB, 0 Certification 0 • Singapore 1 CAB, 0 Certification 0

  7. Mutual Recognition Referred in TBT Agreement (3) • Article 6.4 Members are encouraged to permit participation of conformity assessment bodies located in the territories of other Members in their conformity assessment procedures under conditions no less favorable than those accorded to bodies located within their territory or the territory of any other country.

  8. Cross-Border Designation (Electrical Appliance & Material Safety Law) Designating Authority in Japan Acceptance Designation in accordance with the technical regulations and procedure of Japan Certificate Acceptance Certificate CABs in foreign countries CABs in Japan Conformity Assessment in accordance withthetechnical regulations of Japan Conformity Assessment in accordance withthetechnical regulations of Japan

  9. Mutual Cross-Border Designation Government B Government A Acceptance Certificate Certificate Designation in accordance with the technical Regulations and procedure of country A Designation in accordance with the technical Regulations and procedure of country B CABs in Country B CABs in Country A Conformity Assessment in accordance withthetechnical Regulations of country B Conformity Assessment in accordance withthetechnical Regulations of country A < Equivalent >

  10. Merits and Demerits of Traditional Mutual Recognition and Mutual Cross-Border Designation

  11. Comparison between Traditional Mutual Recognition and Mutual Cross-Border Designation • For Industries: In terms of reducing technical burden to trade, the merits of the two types are the same, since both types make it possible for manufacturers/exporters to take conformity assessment procedures in the exporting country. • For Government: • Negotiation Cost It needs a long time and much human resources to conclude Traditional Mutual Recognition, since this type of MRA requires compatibility of regulatory systems, and equivalence of the technical competence between both countries. • Implementation Cost Case by Case ?

  12. Mutual Recognition mechanisms between Japan & the EU (1) Designating Authority in EU Designating Authority in Japan Acceptance Acceptance Acceptance Certificate Certificate Certificate Designation under traditional MRA Designation under traditional MRA Designation under Cross-Border Designation Mechanism CABs in EU CABs in Japan

  13. Mutual Recognition mechanisms between Japan & the EU (2) • European CABs have 2 choices to assess the conformity with the Japanese Law - as a CAB designated by the EU Member States under Traditional Mutual Recognition - as a CAB designated by Japan under Cross-Border Designation • Japanese CABs have only 1 choice to assess the conformity with the EU Directives - as a CAB designated by Japan under Traditional Mutual Recognition ( no mechanism designated by the EU Member States under Cross-Border Designation ) • Registered Conformity Assessment Bodies & Certification • Traditional Cross-Border Designation • Mutual Recognition • E U 0 2 CABs, Many Certifications • Japan 1 CAB, 37 Certifications －

  14. Private Trade Facilitation Tools - Commercial Networks of Conformity Assessment (1) - • Subcontract between CAB in the Importing Country and CAB in the Exporting Country CABs in the exporting country CABs in the importing country MOU Application of CA Market of the importing country Exporters

  15. Private Trade Facilitation Tools - Commercial Networks of Conformity Assessment (2) - • Subsidiary Bodies in the Exporting Country of CABs in the Importing Country CABs in the importing country Subsidiaries in the exporting country Application of CA Market of the importing country Exporters

  16. Private Trade Facilitation Tools - Commercial Networks of Conformity Assessment (3) - • Direct Application CABs in the importing country Application of CA Exporters Market of the importing country Application of CA Exporters Subsidiaries in the importing country

  17. Private Trade Facilitation Tools - Multilateral Recognition Mechanism - • Multilateral Recognition Mechanism IEC/EE CB Scheme • In the Electric Safety/EMC Area • One Stop Testing among National Certification Bodies > Is there any possibility of similar mechanisms in other product areas ?

  18. Summary • Effective Utilization of Private Facilitation Tools - Commercial Networks in Private Sectors - Multilateral Recognition Mechanism like IEC/EE CB Scheme • Possibility of Cross-Border Designation Mechanism referred in Article 6.4 of the TBT Agreement - Cost-effectiveness in comparison with Traditional Mutual Recognition

More Related