1 / 9

Bell Ringer #3 Take out HW

What is the necessary and proper clause? Where is it found? What is the impact of the necessary and proper clause?. Academic Vocab Amend. Content Vocab Judicial Review Marbury v Madison. Bell Ringer #3 Take out HW. Discuss Homework. Marbury v Madison Role Play. IV. Judicial review.

tiva
Télécharger la présentation

Bell Ringer #3 Take out HW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What is the necessary and proper clause? Where is it found? What is the impact of the necessary and proper clause? Academic Vocab Amend Content Vocab Judicial Review Marbury v Madison Bell Ringer #3Take out HW

  2. Discuss Homework

  3. Marbury v Madison Role Play

  4. IV. Judicial review. A. Power of courts to strike down laws or governmental actions. B Not explicitly provided for in Const., but Const. written in broad terms ---> need for interpretation ---> this most logically falls to the courts. C. Established by Marbury v. Madison, 1803: 1. Facts of case: the end of Federalist control of govt. and appointment of the "midnight judges," including Marbury ---> Jefferson ordered Madison to not deliver commissions to these judges ----------->Marbury's request for a writ of mandamus (under Sect. 13 of Jud. Act. of 1789) from the Supreme Court to order the delivery of his commission. 2. Decision of Marshall and the Court: section 13 of Judiciary Act of 1789 enabling the Court to issue a writ of mandamus through original jurisdiction in this type of case was unconstitutional.

  5. IV. Judicial Review 3. Analysis. a. Marshall ruled that the Court did not have the authority to issue the writ, but he paradoxically increased its power by establishing judicial review when the Court struck down section 13. b. Jefferson couldn't complain because the midnight judges didn't receive their appointments, but he fumed because his enemy, Federalist John Marshall, increased the power of the Court. Effects of judicial review: citizens can challenge constitutionality of laws in court by initiating lawsuits (example: Gideon v. Wainright, 1963)  litigation has become an important way of making public policy.

  6. Clip • http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/n75sz3/cliff-sloan

  7. Bill Of Rights • Summarize the 1st 10 Amendments in your handout

  8. Bill of Rights with your fingers

  9. Exercising your rights • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4nQ_mFJV4I • Write down a paragraph for each • What surprised you • What you learned • What you want to know more about

More Related