1 / 18

Strategic Planning For An Integrated Manufacturing Systems Curriculum

Strategic Planning For An Integrated Manufacturing Systems Curriculum. Ernest B. Ezell,Jr., Associate Professor John W. Sinn, Professor Bowling Green State University NAIT Annual Conference; Panama City, Florida Thursday November 7, 2002, 5:00 PM; Spanish Moss A. Topics

tod
Télécharger la présentation

Strategic Planning For An Integrated Manufacturing Systems Curriculum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strategic Planning For An Integrated Manufacturing Systems Curriculum Ernest B. Ezell,Jr., Associate Professor John W. Sinn, Professor Bowling Green State University NAIT Annual Conference; Panama City, Florida Thursday November 7, 2002, 5:00 PM; Spanish Moss A • Topics • IMS background, challenges • Integrated manufacturing systems (IMS) • 3. What should we know? • 4. IMS framework for change: What does future hold?

  2. IMS Background And Challenges • Three Programs as IMS Start point • Electronic and computer technology • Manufacturing technology • Mechanical design technology • Were The Programs relevant? • Initiated as manufacturing related study, 1997 • Response to falling enrollments, change • Facility, equipment issues, customer demands • Multi-phased work culminated, 2000

  3. IMS Background And Challenges • Since 2000, implementation phase • Primarily undergrad, foundational to graduate • Ownership, common ground challenges • ABET issues, accreditation issues, opportunities • Strong tradition of cooperative education • Two year technical, community college inputs • Advisory committee, professional bodies inputs • Efficiencies, duplication issues, faculty load • Internal, external funding issues, realities • What do technical programs look like in future?

  4. Integrated Manufacturing Systems • Four IMS technical content areas emerged: • Quality systems • Design & concurrent engineering systems • Manufacturing & process engineering systems • Electro-mechanical systems • A “What should we know matrix”, is evolving in each area, providing guidance, validation in: • Technical foundations, concepts, content • Assessment strategies, outcomes anticipated • Ultimately, basis for existence

  5. Quality Systems: What Should We Know?

  6. Conceptual Assessment Framework: Quality Systems Outcomes

  7. Design And Concurrent Engineering Systems: What Should We Know?

  8. Conceptual Assessment Framework: Design And Concurrent Engineering Systems Outcomes

  9. Manufacturing And Process Engineering Systems: What Should We Know?

  10. Conceptual Assessment Framework: Manufacturing And Process Engineering Systems Outcomes

  11. Electro-Mechanical Systems: What Should We Know?

  12. Conceptual Assessment Framework: Electro-Mechanical Systems Outcomes

  13. IMS Framework For Change: What Does The Future Hold? Design & Concurrent Engineering Systems Technical Management Core Knowledge Electro- Mechanical Systems Quality Systems Manufacturing & Process Engineering Systems

  14. IMS Framework For Change: What Does The Future Hold? • Rethinking undergraduate education • Refocusing, strengthening advisory committee • New models for 2 year school relationships • Creation of minors in several areas • Enhanced outreach electronically, increasing • Emerging electronic portfolio systems • New models for supervising co-op’s

  15. IMS Framework For Change: What Does The Future Hold? • “Online Quality Learning Community”……… • Engaging ASQ professionals • New QS curriculum, lean initiative coming • Doing actual industrial projects in quality • Graduate shifts coming, undergraduate basis • What would certificates look like? • Fully electronic degrees coming, BS completion

  16. IMS Framework For Change: What Does The Future Hold? • Strengthened outcome assessment emphasis……. • Defining core knowledge, discipline, IT • Strengthened professional body presence • Course level assessment beginning to emerge • Aligning, matrices, “what should we know?” • Broadened rubrics for assessment • Clearer relationships among programs

  17. IMS Framework For Change: What Does The Future Hold? • Defining core knowledge, discipline, IT…….. • Exploring core courses, common ground • Professional bodies explored, ASQ, SME, NAIT • Technical management, quality, productivity • Quality, applications, ISO, QS 9000 • How to do technical projects, ecommerce • Adjusting, matrices, “what should we know?”

  18. IMS Framework For Change: What Does The Future Hold? • Questions about: • Administrative structure…… • Administrative support…….. • Professional certification…….assessment……. • Are we able to shift…….new paradigms? • E-commerce, assessment, electronic portfolios • Adjusting, matrices, “what should we know?”

More Related