1 / 26

Six years of Dark Energy: present and future prospects

Six years of Dark Energy: present and future prospects. Ariel Goobar Physics Department, Stockholm University. SCP :Perlmutter et al + High-Z Team:Riess et al. Supernova Cosmology Project (SCP). Year 5 AD. Sullivan et al 2003. Redshift.

todd
Télécharger la présentation

Six years of Dark Energy: present and future prospects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Six years of Dark Energy: present and future prospects Ariel Goobar Physics Department, Stockholm University

  2. SCP:Perlmutter et al + High-Z Team:Riess et al Supernova Cosmology Project (SCP)

  3. Year 5 AD Sullivan et al 2003 Redshift

  4. 5 AD: concordance model (see also Tonry et al 2003, Barris et al 2004) Independent evidence also from eg: • LSS (eg Peacock et al) • ISW (eg Boughn & Crittenden) • Cluster abundances (eg Bahcall et al) • Age of Universe • X-ray clusters (Allen et al 04) LSS • ISW stat syst

  5. SN1a: systematic effects • Non-Type Ia contamination • Malmquist bias • K-corrections and SN colors • Extinction by host galaxy dust • Extinction by intergalactic dust • SN brightness evolution • Shape-brightness relation • Instrumental corrections • Lightcurve fitting technique/host galaxy subtraction • Gravitational lensing • Exotica: axion-photon oscillations, etc • … No extinction correction. Reddened SNe excluded With extinction correction Largest source of identified syst in Knop et al: uncertainty in the intrinsic colors of SN1a ar short l

  6. Spectroscopic tests of standard candle CaII (3900) velocity subluminous overluminous subluminous Folatelli et al, Garavini et al , Lidman et al

  7. Statistical uncertainty: Redshift dependence AG & Perlmutter 95 95

  8. Turning 6! Very-high Z supernovae from ACS/HST (Riess et al 2004) • >19 SNe discovered from space, up to z=1.7 • Reported CL-regions due tostatisticalerrors

  9. Extinction corrections • z-dependence in reported Av ? • Problems with K-corrections/assumed intrinsic colors in UV part of the SNIa spectrum? • Changing dust properties ? • Selection effects? • Watch out for priors on AV! Riess et al assume P(Av)~exp(-Av) • A careful study of extinction correction systematics for z>0.9 SNe (as done in Knop et al for z<0.9) is still missing. Riess et al 2004 (gold sample) SN97ff: assumed extinction- free, E-host Uncertainties ?

  10. Gray(er) IG dust • Large dust grains (weak wavelength dependence) may populate the IG-medium (Aguirre 1999,2000) • Evolution of dust density: two limiting cases considered: • dust (1+z)3[Model A] • dust (1+z)3 for z<0.5 & dust(z>0.5)= dust(z=0.5) [Model B, ”replenishing dust”] • Hard to rule out from SN-colors • X-ray point-sources at very high-z, (e.g. Paerels et al) do not exclude e.g Model B • SDSS QSO colors (2740 objects, z<2) <0.2 mag extinction for SN1a at z=1; faintness of SNe unlikely due to only IG-dust AG,Bergström & Mörtsell, A&A, 2002 Model A Concordance Milne ModelB; M=1 Dust is still a serious concern for precision cosmology with SNe. Mörtsell & AG, JCAP, 2003

  11. Download: www.physto.se/~ariel MC + cosmology fitting code specifically developed to understand science reach and systematic uncertainties in observations of high-z SNe, e.g. due to intervening dust gravitational lensing, search biases, non-SNIa contamination, etc. A.G et al (2002) Astronomy & Astrophysics, 392,757

  12. bias in the cosmology fitdue to lensing 20% co • GL →asymmetric mag. distributions • Bias in cosmological results • However, with proper statistical treatment bias can be kept low + fraction of compact objects in DM derived Mörtsell, Gunnarson, AG, ApJ, 2001; SNAP simulations, Mörtsell, AG, Bergström. ApJ, 2001;Amanullah, Mörtsell, AG; A&A, 2003

  13. Is Dark Energy =  ? Although  appears to be the ”simplest” explanation to the data, there are fundamental theoretical problems: • why so small? • why is the vacuum density so close to matter density now? present SN data consistent with with w=-1, i.e cosmological constant, although rapid evolution has been suggested... Tobias Goobar, age 6

  14. Rapidly changing w? • Alam et al (2003,2004) proposed fitting SN data with truncated Taylor expansion for DE. • Claim: signs for rapid evolution in w: Metamorphosis • Seems like reasonable parametrization, however... • The expression of w comes from derivatives of ansatz in H(z) • Parts of parameter-space causes divergences • As z increases, limiting value of wDE≠-1 • Parametrization ”forces” Metamorphosis

  15. Theoretical systematics Test: simulate + fit 500 experiments , z-distribution and uncertainties as in Tonry + Barris et al L-cosmology |w|>15 w diverges Metamorphosis not required to explain the fits! ”Transition redshift” set by prior on M Jönsson, AG, Amanullah, Bergström, astro-ph/0404468

  16. Theoretical systematics Test: simulate + fit 500 experiments , z-distribution and uncertainties as in Tonry + Barris et al L-cosmology |w|>15 w diverges Metamorphosis not needed to explain the fits! ”Transition redshift” set by prior on M Jönsson, AG, Amanullah, Bergström, astro-ph/0404468

  17. Theoretical systematics Test: simulate + fit 500 experiments , z-distribution and uncertainties as in Tonry + Barris et al L-cosmology |w|>15 w diverges Metamorphosis not needed to explain the fits! ”Transition redshift” set by prior on M Jönsson, AG, Amanullah, Bergström, astro-ph/0404468

  18. Major ongoing/future SN programs • Low redshift: starting in 2004 Carnegie Supernova Project ~200 SN1a with z<0.07´(UBVRIJHK) SuperNova Factory ~300 SN1a z<0.08 • Intermediate redshift: starting 2005(?) SLOAN ~300 0.1<z<0.4 • High-z SNLS: 2003-2008; 700 SNe 0.3<z<0.9 ESSENCE:2002-2005; 200 SNe 0.2<z<0.7 • Very High-z (z>1) 2003-2005 PANS/GOODS + SCP: ~50 (1 < z < 2)

  19. Dark Energy statistical precision from CFHT Legacy Survey

  20. Dark Energy and Dark Matter. - Long term future Supernova Project SNAP/JDEM satellite: several thousend very high-z Sne/year + weak lensing survey ~2-meter mirror 0.7° FOV imaging + spectroscopy 0.35-1.7 mm,

  21. The Next Generation: SNAP/JDEM – good controll of systematics SNAP

  22. SNAP: probing Dark Energy models

  23. SNAP precision on w’ Planck data provides complementarity equal to a prior (M)0.01. Frieman, Huterer, Linder, Turner 2002

  24. SNAP: Weak Gravitational Lensing Distortion of background images by foreground matter UnlensedLensed Credits: R.Ellis

  25. √ SNe + Weak Lensing (cf A.Taylor) Bernstein, Huterer, Linder, & Takada • Comprehensive: no external priors required! • Independent test of flatness to 1-2% • Complementary: w0 to 5%, w to 0.11 (with systematics)

  26. Summary & Conclusions • Quite healthy 6 year old! Evidence for DE seems robust w.r.t identified systematic effects.. • is Dark Energy=? No convincing evidence against it! • stat ~ syst→ need better quality data to make use of large statistics to come… • New very high-zfrom ground and space extremely exciting but sytematics not yet fully studied. • Large number of ongoing projects will provide several hundreds (thousends?) of nearby and distant supernovae. • SNAP/JDEM a very exciting mission with capability of resolving the DE mysteri...but launch in 2014???

More Related