1 / 36

Practical Clinical Trials and the AHRQ Experience

Practical Clinical Trials and the AHRQ Experience. Carolyn M. Clancy, MD Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AIFA European Conference on Clinical Research for Decision-Making Rome – March 30, 2007. AHRQ & PCTs. AHRQ Overview Personalized Health Care

toki
Télécharger la présentation

Practical Clinical Trials and the AHRQ Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Practical Clinical Trials and the AHRQ Experience Carolyn M. Clancy, MD Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AIFA European Conference on Clinical Research for Decision-Making Rome – March 30, 2007

  2. AHRQ & PCTs • AHRQ Overview • Personalized Health Care • Practical Clinical Trials • Q&A

  3. AHRQ’s Mission Improve the quality, safety, efficiency and effectiveness of health care for all Americans

  4. HHS Organizational Focus NIH Biomedical research to prevent, diagnose and treat diseases CDC Population health and the role of community-based interventions to improve health AHRQ Long-term and system-wide improvement of health care quality and effectiveness

  5. Combating the “Sting of Ignorance” “The nation faces two yawning medical information gaps. First, we need more studies comparing treatments… what about the insurers, private and governmental, who pay such a large share of the nation’s $220 billion annual drug bill? They could support such studies with the rounding error of their annual budgets — and then save billions if the findings were put Into practice. The second problem is that much of the knowledge we do have is not communicated…we need an unbiased, efficient system to get the word out to practitioners on what works best.” Jerry Avorn, Professor, Harvard Medical School New York Times Op-Ed September 16, 2006

  6. Comparative Effectiveness:Effective Health Care Program • Designed to support the new Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2006 • Mandated by Section 1013 of the Medicare Modernization Act to improve the quality, effectiveness and efficiency of health care delivered through Medicare, Medicaid and the S-CHIP programs • Builds on years of experience gained through AHRQ’s Evidence-Based Practice Centers

  7. Effective Health Care Program Translate Evidence into Improvements (Eisenberg Clinical Decisions & Communications Science Center) Review/Compare Existing Evidence (Evidence-Based Practice Centers) Accelerate Practical Studies (DEcIDE Network)

  8. Comparative Effectiveness Review: Management Strategies for Renal Artery Stenosis • Major Finding: No clear advantage found to treating narrowed kidney arteries with angioplasty, with or without a stent, over drug therapy • Narrowed kidney arteries are most common cause of correctable high blood pressure • Drug therapy and angioplasty both improve blood pressure and slow down the worsening of kidney function AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Review No.5, Comparative Effectiveness of Management of Renal Artery Stenosis, October 2006, Available at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov

  9. Comparative Effectiveness Reviews in Progress • Comparative Effectiveness of Drug Therapies for Rheumatoid or Psoriatic Arthritis • Comparison of Therapies for Low Bone Density • Comparison of Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer • Evidence of Off-Label Use of Atypical Anti-Psychotic Medications

  10. Sample DEcIDE Projects

  11. Eisenberg Clinical Decisions and Communications Center • The knowledge is used to maximize the benefits of health care, minimize harm and optimize the use of health care resources • Presents evidence synthesized by the Evidence-Based Practice Centers and generated by the DeCIDE Network in actionable formats for stakeholders including patients, providers, policymakers and the public Oregon Health & Sciences University

  12. http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/dsc/products.cfm New Eisenberg Center Summary Guides

  13. 2008 Priorities Patient Safety • Health IT • Patient SafetyOrganizations • New PatientSafety Grants Effective HealthCare Program AmbulatoryPatient Safety • Comparative Effectiveness Reports • Network of Research Centers • Clear Findings for Multiple Audiences • Safety & Quality Measures,Drug Management andPatient-Centered Care • Patient Safety ImprovementCorps Medical ExpenditurePanel Surveys Other Research & Dissemination Activities • Quality & Cost-Effectiveness, e.g.Prevention and PharmaceuticalOutcomes • U.S. Preventive ServicesTask Force • Visit-Level Information on Medical Expenditures • Annual Quality & Disparities Reports

  14. Questions are the Answer • Patient Involvement Campaign by AHRQ and the AD Council • Series of TV, radio and prints Public Service Announcements • A Web site that features a “Question Builder” for patients to enhance their medical appointments • The message: Get More Involved With Your Health Care

  15. FY 2008 Request • FY 2008 Request = $329,564,000 • Increase of $10,872,000, or 3.4%, from the FY 2007 Continuing Resolution Level • Department-wide $15,000,000 Initiative related to Personalized Health Care

  16. FY 2008 Initiative:Personalized Health Care • Personalized Health Care • +$15 million • The initiative will accelerate the movement toward personalized health care and help bring “next generation” effectiveness of care for individual patients. • This initiative is essential to our drive for health care transparency by identifying and consistently measuring effective, high quality care.

  17. Partnership ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD CLINICAL RESEARCH CLINICAL RESEARCH CLINICAL RESEARCH CLINICAL RESEARCH PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

  18. Disease Diagnosis Gene Therapy Drug Design The Promise of Genomics “We stand on the threshold of creating a future that will revolutionize the practice of medicine by allowing us to predict disease, develop more precise therapies and, ultimately, pre-empt the development of disease in the first place.” Elias Zerhouni, 2006

  19. Specialized Care Examples of interventions/diagnostics that can help specific groups of people Iressa – Foradvanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment. A gene-based test can help identify patients who might be helped by the drug Gleevec – For treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (gene-based)

  20. Challenges • Using data on outcomes of gene-based testing, which currently is rarely collected • Acquiring data on diagnostics, therapeutics and patient outcomes from many different databases • Using administrative data for research purposes • Securely linking data from multiple resources

  21. Solutions • A secure Web-based system for sharing gene-based data among multiple organizations • Partnerships that encourage research, development and increased implementations • Shared decision-making

  22. Are patient outcomes improved? What are the harms? Do the benefits outweigh the harms? What is the incremental benefit? Is the real-world net benefit the same as in clinical trials? What are the costs? Given the net benefit and costs, is the intervention justified? Key Questions for Decision-Makers

  23. Reliable evidence is essential to improving health care quality and to supporting efficient use of limited resources

  24. Question Hypothesis Study Publications Changes in practice Clinical Evaluation Science: Phase 1

  25. Clinical Evaluation Science: Phase 2 Publications (multiple) Evidence synthesis Guidelines, Performance Measures Changes in Practice

  26. Practical Clinical Trials • Compare clinically relevant interventions • Enroll a diverse study population • Recruit from a variety of practice settings • Measure a broad range of relevant health outcomes

  27. PCTs vs. ECTs

  28. AHRQ GOLD Grant: Cluster Randomized Trials • HMO research Network CERT – Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Wellesley, MA • CRTs are rarely used to study the comparative effectiveness of multiple treatments, such as two different drug regimens. This study: • Issues that must be addressed in order to perform CRTs in a manner that is acceptable to all parties, feasible and methodologically sound • Evaluate medical ethics and develop ethical standards to inform researchers and health plans considering CRTs. Duration of Project September 1, 2000 – September 29, 2007

  29. Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri • 2001 study of 3,567 outpatients with type 2 diabetes, using AHRQ’s Diabetes PORT • Findings involving101 outpatient diabetic clinics and 103 general practitioners throughout Italy: • Self-monitoring of blood glucose can improve metabolic control as part of a strategy for promoting patient autonomy • For patients not treated with insulin, self-monitoring is associated with higher blood glucose levels and psychological burden Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri

  30. The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services 2006 • Contains 53 new or revised clinical preventive services recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force • AHRQ and United Health Foundation to distribute 430,000 copies to primary care physicians

  31. Electronic Preventive Services Selector (ePSS) • A quick hands-on tool designed to help primary care clinicians identify screening, counseling and preventive medication services appropriate for patients • PDA and Web versions based on current USPSTF recommendations, searchable by specific patient characteristics • Available at www.ePSS.ahrq.gov Consumer Version Underway

  32. Why is the Supply of PCTs Inadequate? • Inadequate public and private funding • Costly and often longitudinal studies • Lack of organized mechanism to identify high priority questions for decision makers

  33. Increasing PCTs Supplies • Development of a mechanism to establish priorities for these studies • Significant expansion of an infrastructure to conduct clinical research within the health care delivery system • More reliance on high-quality evidence by health care decision makers • Substantial increase in public and private funding for these studies

  34. Strategies for Improvement • Systematically identify and prioritize knowledge gaps • Decision makers Insist on high-quality evidence in making decisions • Create operational infrastructure • Address Methodological and Ethical Issues • Examine funding options

  35. Your questions?

More Related