1 / 14

TIPS 4.5 metoodikaseminar 21.10.2011

TIPS 4.5 metoodikaseminar 21.10.2011. Merli Reidolf, doktorant TTÜ ärikorralduse instituut. OECD Self-evaluation report – City of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Arvandmed raportis. Overview of demographics for Rotterdam (1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2007, 2008 ) Population

toki
Télécharger la présentation

TIPS 4.5 metoodikaseminar 21.10.2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TIPS 4.5 metoodikaseminar 21.10.2011 Merli Reidolf, doktorant TTÜ ärikorralduse instituut

  2. OECD Self-evaluationreport – City of Rotterdam, TheNetherlands

  3. Arvandmed raportis • Overview of demographics for Rotterdam (1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2007, 2008) • Population • Potential labour force (15-64) 69% • % male 50%; % female 50% • Education level (% of labourforce) -Low 29%; average 37%; High 34% • Low = primary education and first phase of (senior) secondary education, average = second phase of (senior)secondary education, high is HPE and university level. • Unemployment rate 6,6% • Average household income € 25.500 • Emigration 35.110 ja Immigration 37.448

  4. Arvandmed raportis 2 • Education of labourforce • Native ja migrants • Forecastedcomposition of thepopulation (origin) • Non-western, native, EUmemberstatesotherwestern • Number of students of HEIs nad share ofnon-westernstudents • GDP percapita; Unemploymentrate; sectoralstructure (13+1 sectors)accordingto number of jobs (%) • Netherlands vs Rotterdam area • Changeinsectors • Accordingtoaddedvalue and employeespersector • Number of emlpoyeesrelatedtocompanysize (% oftotal) • Netherlands vs Rotterdam (<10; 10-100; >100) • Number of citizensemployedin R&D companies

  5. Arvandmed raportis 3 • To monitor development at neighbourhood level, the city recently developed the so-called‘social-index’. This index is composed of 4 indicators: • 1. participation (education, social contacts, social-cultural involvement, possibilitytotake part elections) • 2. capacities (health, income, language) • 3. quality of surrounding (physical) • 4. social cohesion (neighbourhood level). • The scores are divided into the following categories:Very weak < 3,9; Problematic 3,9 – 4,9;Vulnerable5 – 5,9;Sufficient 6 – 7;Strong> 7 • A study in 20088 noted the following characteristics of the identity and culture of Rotterdam: • Transformation from a port city to a city with a waterfront; Citizens have a high work ethic; Open and direct mentality as an approach to other people; Preference for big festivals, large crowds, large following of the city’s football teams; Open space, city of opportunities; Renewal; City of youth and minorities

  6. Contribution of researchtoregionalinnovationsystems • DESCRIPTION OF • Policies and strategies • Institutional perspective • UNI-s are more oriented on a national and international level • UAS (uni-s of applied science) more focused on the region • Vions and mission of the institutionse • Programmes and excamples on common project and activities (like science parks, funds • Contacts with business community

  7. LABOUR MARKET NAD TALENT DEVELOPMENT • Study programmes and thefields of study programmes • port and maritime; medical and paramedialcare; creativeindustry; teachertraining • Descr. Of howstudents are linkedtothecompaniesduringthestudies • Studyrecruitment • Enamus üliõpilasi on pärit ümbritsevast regioonist, eriti UAS • Descr of recruitment (reklaamimise) variantidest • Support and councelling of students • Practicedriveneducation • Minors, inclentrepreneurship • Alumni (contacts) • Lifelonglearning – students > 25 aastat

  8. Contributiontosocial,cultural and environmentaldevelopment • Integraldistrictdevelopment (urbanrenovation, compensateforthedisadvantagesinthesocial, economic and physicalfieldsinsomedistrictscomparedtoothersin Rotterdam) • Health – inthelargestcitiesthehealth and lifeexcpectancyrankings are notasgoodasingeneralinNetherlands, unhealthylifestyleamonglesseducatedpeopleetc. • Youthpolicy – 20% of residents are under 188, 170 differentcultures, poverty, unemploymentrisks.

  9. Rotterdamy OECD ekspertide aruandes rõhutatakse muuhulgas Florida 3T (technology, talent and tolerance) rolli http://creativeclass.com/rfcgdb/articles/the%20university%20and%20the%20creative%20economy.pdf. US metropolitan regioonide analüüsis Florida, R., Gates, G., Knudsen., Stolarick (2006) Theuniversity and CreativeEconomy.

  10. kasutatud näitajad: TECHNOLOGY • R&D kulutused percapita; innovationdisclosersperfaculty and patent applicationsperfaculty • Licensingincomeperfaculty, totallicensingincome, startupsper 1000 faculty, totalstartups 8still inbusiness)

  11. kasutatud näitajad: Talent • Collegestudentsper 10 000, totalcollegestudents, facultyper 10 000, totalfaculty • Creativeclass (Florida 2002) – occupationsinwhichindividuals „engageincomplexproblemsolvingthatinvolves a greatdeal of independentjudgement and rquireshighlevels of educationorhumancapital • Super-creative – composed of computer and mathoccupations, architecture and engineering,life, physical and socialscience, education, traininglibrory, arts and design, entertainment, sport, mediaaswellascreativeprofessionals . Classicalknowledgeworkers, incl. Management, business, financial, legal, healthcare, technical, high-endsales.

  12. kasutatud näitajad: Braindrainorgain • BDGI, % of entirepopulationincollege, % 18-34 incollege, % 25 and abovewithdegree • iscalculatedasthe % of thepopulationage 25 and overwith BA degreeorabove, dividedbythe % of thepopulationages 18-34 currentlyinthecollegeor uni (post-secondaryschool). • Regioon mille BDGI on >1.0 isbraindrainregion, a net breeder id donor of universitytalents. Itretainsproportionallyfewerdegreeholdersthandegreeearners.

  13. kasutatud näitajad: Tolerance

  14. ÜK roll on oluline, aga üksi ei tee midagi • Technology juures on ÜK roll ülehinnatud, • Talendi ja Tolerantsuse juures on oluline

More Related