1 / 16

AURORA UNIVERSITY IMSP PROGRAM IMPACT

AURORA UNIVERSITY IMSP PROGRAM IMPACT. David Abler , Hans Beck, Dorothea Chianakas, Jane Davis, Lora de Lacey, Sherry Eagle, Joan Fee, Carolyn Kerkla, Saib Othman, Chetna Patel February 8, 2011 Superintendent Presentation . IMSP PROGRAMS AT AURORA UNIVERSITY.

torgny
Télécharger la présentation

AURORA UNIVERSITY IMSP PROGRAM IMPACT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AURORA UNIVERSITY IMSP PROGRAM IMPACT David Abler , Hans Beck, Dorothea Chianakas, Jane Davis, Lora de Lacey, Sherry Eagle, Joan Fee, Carolyn Kerkla, Saib Othman, Chetna Patel February 8, 2011 Superintendent Presentation

  2. IMSP PROGRAMS AT AURORA UNIVERSITY MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHER LEADERSHIP (M.A.T.L.) • Elementary Teachers of Mathematics and Science • Middle and High School Teachers of Mathematics • Middle and High School Teachers of Life Science SUMMER WORKSHOP/INSTITUTES • Mathematics • Physical Science • Elementary Mathematics (graduate credit)

  3. PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT COLLABORATION East Aurora School District 131 Indian Prairie School District 204 Downers Grove Carpentersville Community Unit School District 300

  4. COMMUNITY COLLABORATION Community partners contributed to content design and delivery and provided internship opportunities. • Challenger Space Center for Space Science Education • DuPage Children’s Museum • Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy • Packer Engineering Center for Applications Based Learning • Robert Crown Health Education Center • SciTech Hands On Museum

  5. IMPACT ON PARTNERS • Achieve missions of not-for-profit organizations “to promote, organize, support and conduct experience-based learning opportunities, to further interest and knowledge in science, engineering and technology” - Packer Engineering CABL Mission Statement • Increased knowledge of P-20 educators • Expanded network of people who are supportive and proactive in STEM education • Expanded workforce development initiative • Developed a capacity to train educators

  6. IMPACT ON FUTURE TEACHER LEADERS • Teacher Leadership endorsement • Increased leadership roles within their district • Expanded skills and knowledge in multiple areas • Fulfills state requirement of five-year professional development plan

  7. PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS • Seminars for the participants • Internships • Action Research

  8. PROGRAM BENCHMARKS • Content Knowledge • Instructional Resources • Teaching Strategies • Classroom Technology

  9. M.A.T.L. – Elementary Mathematics and Science 2009–2010 Mean Growth in Teacher Content Knowledge Mean Growth in Student Achievement DTAMS – Diagnostic Teacher Assessment of Mathematics and Science *DTAMS Effect Size, d = 1.39 (“considerably significant” level) **DTAMS Effect Size, d = 1.30 (“considerably significant” level) ***ISAT Effect Size, d = 1.05 (“considerably significant” level) Meta-Analysts: Yuan Hong, Rutgers University; Jimmy de la Torre, Rutgers University

  10. M.A.T.L. – Mathematics 2009–2010 Mean Growth in Teacher Content Knowledge Mean Growth in Student Achievement DTAMS – Diagnostic Teacher Assessment of Mathematics and Science *DTAMS Effect Size, d = 0.97 (“considerably significant” level) **Diagnostic Test in Calculus Readiness Effect Size, d = 1.34 (“considerably significant” level) Meta-Analysts: Yuan Hong, Rutgers University; Jimmy de la Torre, Rutgers University

  11. M.A.T.L. – Life Science 2009–2010 Mean Growth in Teacher Content Knowledge Mean Growth in Student Achievement *Biochemistry Effect Size, d = 1.70 (“considerably significant” level) **VNOS – Views of Nature of Science VNOS Effect Size, d = .45 (“significant” level) Meta-Analysts: Yuan Hong, Rutgers University; Jimmy de la Torre, Rutgers University

  12. WIP I – MS/HS Mathematics 2009–2010 Mean Growth in Teacher Content Knowledge Mean Growth in Student Achievement *DTAMS – Diagnostic Teacher Assessment of Mathematics and Science **ISAT Effect Size, d = 0 .94 (“considerably significant” level) Meta-Analysts: Yuan Hong, Rutgers University; Jimmy de la Torre, Rutgers University

  13. WIP I – MS/HS Physical Science 2009–2010 Mean Growth in Teacher Content Knowledge Mean Growth in Student Achievement *DTAMS – Diagnostic Teacher Assessment of Mathematics and Science **ISAT Math reported because ISAT science data not available ISAT Effect Size, d = 0.34 (“minimally significant” level) Meta-Analysts: Yuan Hong, Rutgers University; Jimmy de la Torre, Rutgers University

  14. WIP II – Elementary Mathematics/Science 2010 Mean Growth in Teacher Content Knowledge Mean Growth in Teacher Content Knowledge DTAMS – Diagnostic Teacher Assessment of Mathematics and Science *Individual scores show that 7 of 11 teacher-participants showed gains in pedagogical content knowledge **Individual scores show that 12 of 12 teacher-participants showed gains in pedagogical content knowledge Student pre- and post-data will be available Fall 2011

  15. IMPACT ON AURORA UNIVERSITY • FACULTY • State-of-the-art educational technology • Opportunities for faculty to present nationally • Trained faculty in STEM education and assessment • ADMINISTRATION • Increased awareness and support of mathematics and science education across campus • Support of external funding opportunities and partnerships • Internal collaborations between colleges

  16. PROGRAM ACHIEVEMENTS Based on State of Illinois evaluation: • Top-Rated (transformative) in five categories • Partnership composition • Organizational structure • Action plan and operational guidelines • Partnership quality • Sustainability • Highly-Rated (developing)in two categories • Performance and outcomes • Local evaluation implementation

More Related