1 / 43

Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering

Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering. A Study of Time-based Features and Regularity of Manipulation to Improve the Detection of Eating Activity Periods During Free-Living. MS Defense Exam Jose Luis Reyes. Dr. Adam Hoover (chair) Dr. Eric Muth Dr. Richard Groff. April 24, 2014.

torgny
Télécharger la présentation

Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering A Study of Time-based Features and Regularity of Manipulation to Improve the Detection of Eating Activity Periods During Free-Living MS Defense Exam Jose Luis Reyes Dr. Adam Hoover (chair) Dr. Eric Muth Dr. Richard Groff April 24, 2014

  2. Outline • Motivation and Background • Design and Methods • Results • Conclusion

  3. Obesity • Common • 34% of U.S. population are obese [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] • Serious • 5th leading risk for global deaths [WHO, 2014] • Heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and certain types of cancer [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] • Costly • In 2008, annual medical cost was $147 billion in the U.S. [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] • In 2008, medical cost was $1,429 higher than of those of normal weight. [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]

  4. Obesity treatments • Dietary changes • Exercise and activity • Behavior changes • Weight-loss medication • Weight-loss surgery • Limit energy intake (EI)* • Balancing EI and EE (energy expenditure)

  5. Monitoring EI • Most widely used tools • Food diary • 24-hour recall • Food frequency questionnaire • Technology-based tools • Camera [Martin et al., 2009] • Wearable sensors [Amft et al., 2008]

  6. Bite Counter • Watch-like device • Wrist motion tracking • Accelerometer and gyroscope

  7. Previous work • Goal: Detection of eating activity periods • Based on accelerometer (AccX, AccY, AccZ) and gyroscope (Yaw, Pitch, Roll) readings • Data segmentation • Classification of eating activity (EA) and non-eating activity (non-EA) periods based on features • Overall accuracy obtained was 81%

  8. Novelty • Previous work considered only sensor-based features • We consider the time component • Time since last eating activity • Cumulative eating time • Periodicity of manipulation over time • Regularity of manipulation

  9. Design and methods • Overview of algorithm • Data collection • New features • Regularity of manipulation • Time since last EA • Cumulative eating time • Evaluation metrics

  10. Overview of algorithm (Dong et al., 2013) • Data smoothing • - Gaussian kernel

  11. Overview of algorithm • Sum of acceleration,

  12. Overview of algorithm • Data segmentation • Peak detection • Sum of acceleration • Hysteresis threshold

  13. Overview of algorithm • Features • Manipulation • Linear acceleration • Wrist roll motion • Regularity of roll

  14. Overview of algorithm • Naive Bayes Classifier • Assign most probable class, ci in C • Given features f1,f2, …, fN • Feature probability

  15. Data collection • Collected using iPhone 4 • Programmable , large amount of memory, accelerometer and gyroscope • Recorded at 15Hz • 2 sets of data • Set 1: 20 recordings • Set 2: 23 recordings • A total of 449 hours of data • Data training • 5 minute non-EA segments • Full segments for EA

  16. Current work • Motivation: improve previous accuracy of 81% • Introduction of 3 new features: • Regularity of manipulation • Time since last EA • Cumulative eating time

  17. Features • Feature 1, regularity of manipulation • Regularity of peaks around 4000-5000 (deg/s)/G • Peaks every 10 – 30 seconds? EA manipulation segment Non-EA manipulation segment

  18. Regularity of manipulation • Smooth manipulation data (N = 225, R = 37.6) • Compute FFT • Compute: • Units: (deg/s3)/G

  19. Regularity of manipulation 29>> • Calculate for each segment in data • Distribution statistics can be used for Bayes classifier Distributions (set 1)

  20. Regularity of manipulation Distributions (set 2) 34>>

  21. Features • Feature 2, time since last eating activity • Time component • After a person eats, very unlikely to eat again immediately • Probability starts increasing as time passes

  22. Time since last EA • Let tlast = end time of last segments classified as EA • Let t = middle of time of unknown segment currently being classified • Then,

  23. Time since last EA • Bayes classifier requires probability distributions for both EA and non-EA • It is possible to calculate time between meals • Nonsensical for opposite class • Time since last non-EA? • 1 – p(f|EA)

  24. Time since last EA • Compute cumulative distribution function (CDF) of time since last EA. • p(f|EA) = CDF, p(f|nonEA) = 1 - CDF CDF for time since last EA (set 2)

  25. Features • Feature 3, cumulative eating time • Time component • People spend a certain amount of time eating and drinking in a day(Around 1.1 hrs. according to Dept. of Labor Statistics )

  26. Cumulative eating time • At time t, cumulative eating time: • Distribution of times involving non events are nonsensical • Compute CDF for each recording and average in each data set

  27. Cumulative eating time CDF for cumulative eating time (set 2)

  28. Cumulative eating time • p(f|EA) = • σ2cdf, μcdf from average CDF • p(f|nonEA) = 1 – p(f|EA)

  29. Evaluation metrics • Overall accuracy • EA accuracy • Non-EA accuracy

  30. Results • Previous work • Statistics • Accuracy

  31. Results • Regularity of manipulation • Statistics • Accuracy

  32. Regularity of manipulation (Results) • Standard deviation relatively large for EA distribution (<<18) • Set 1’s EA distribution non Gaussian • FFT not completely discriminating between EAs and non-EAs

  33. Regularity of manipulation (Results) Smoothed manipulation segment from EA distribution (right tail) Smoothed manipulation segment from non-EA distribution (left tail)

  34. Regularity of manipulation (Results) Smoothed manipulation segment from EA distribution (middle) Smoothed manipulation segment from non-EA distribution (middle) <<20

  35. Regularity of manipulation (Results) Original data for segment in middle of EA distribution Original data for segment in middle of non-EA distribution

  36. Results • Time since last EA • Statistics • Accuracy Set 1 Set 2

  37. Time since last EA (Results) Original 4 features Original 4 features + time since last EA

  38. Time since last EA (Results) • FPs are strong inhibitors for immediately subsequent data Original Including time since last EA

  39. Results • Cumulative eating time • Statistics • Accuracy Set 1 Set 2

  40. Cumulative eating time (Results) Original 4 features Original 4 features + cumulative eating time

  41. Cumulative eating time (Results) • FPs are strong inhibitors for immediately subsequent data Original Including cumulative eating time

  42. Conclusion • FFT not discriminating between EAs and non-EAs completely • Time-based features act as clocks • Future work • Explore regularity of manipulation using non-sinusoidal transform • Explore off-line analysis using time-based features so the optimal daily solution can be found (HMMs)

  43. Thank you! Questions?

More Related