1 / 17

Museums best practices

Museums best practices. Perspective and methodology of the analysis. Qualitative rather than quantitative Major aspects analysed: interactivity with the user direct and easy navigation Tailored content (focusing on the quality and functionality of the content).

tryna
Télécharger la présentation

Museums best practices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Museums best practices Stockolm 11 June 2001

  2. Perspective and methodology of the analysis • Qualitative rather than quantitative • Major aspects analysed: • interactivity with the user • direct and easy navigation • Tailored content (focusing on the quality and functionality of the content) Stockolm 11 June 2001

  3. Market value of public on-line cultural services keys to success for on line user-oriented services : • tailored content (focusing on the quality and functionality of content, for specific groups of users) • interactivity (user involvement and participation) • community (targeting interests specific audiences and promoting communication and exchange of information) • joined up services (add additional integrated services to enhance users satisfactions and fostering loyalty to the web site) ( Source “Creating e-Value” August 2000- DCMS) Stockolm 11 June 2001

  4. Cultural institutions and the WWW Stockolm 11 June 2001

  5. “Publishing” museums web sites: just a few examples USA: • The Museum of modern art ; http://www.moma.org Italy: • Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza di Firenzehttp://galileo.imss.firenze.it • Museo della Scienza e tecnica “Leonardo da Vinci” di Milanohttp://www.museoscienza.org/ …… Stockolm 11 June 2001

  6. “Interactive” museums web sites: just a few examples USA: • The Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art ; http://www.metmuseum.org France: • Musée du Louvre (educational section)http://www.louvre.edu …… Stockolm 11 June 2001

  7. MOMA home page Stockolm 11 June 2001

  8. MOMA web site: main features Excellent features : • Easy and direct navigation • Big collection and many online exhibitions • educational resources • e-commerce applications of its store Not Excellent features : • No search through the collection • Only in English Stockolm 11 June 2001

  9. Museo scienza e tecnicaLeonardo da Vinci Stockolm 11 June 2001

  10. Museo Leonardo da Vinci web site: main features Excellent features : • Virtual navigation with some interactive features • Easy navigation • Some interesting educational resources • Multilingual site (Italian, English and French) • Agreement with Amazon for on-line purchase of related publications • Useful international links Not Excellent features : • Interactivity could be enhanced: only mailing list and virtual tour • No searchable database Stockolm 11 June 2001

  11. Istituto e Museo di storia della scienza di Firenze Stockolm 11 June 2001

  12. IMSS web site: main features Excellent features : • Good integration of a thematic museum and its library • Searchable database for the Library • Thematic online exhibitions in the museum section • Experimentation of wap services Not Excellent features : • Weak Interactivity • Library section is only in Italian • NO searchable database in the museum section Stockolm 11 June 2001

  13. Metropolitan Stockolm 11 June 2001

  14. Metropolitan web site: main features Excellent features : • Strong interaction with the user ( sense of community): “my met calendar”, “my met gallery”… • Thematic access and search functionalities to a big collection • e-commerce applications of its store Not Excellent features : • Only in English • No on-line access for physically impaired Stockolm 11 June 2001

  15. Louvre.edu Stockolm 11 June 2001

  16. Louvre.edu web site: main features Excellent features : • Easy and captivating navigation • Thematic Access and search functionalities to a big collection • Good quality of text and tales related to an author • Interactive tool that allows user to publish his/her own final product Not Excellent features : • Only in French • Relatively slow Stockolm 11 June 2001

  17. Conclusions Regnet should become a reference for • Interactive and transactive web sites/portals • Regnet community ( personalised e-mails, “regnet calendars” or “regnet” wish list • Networking model: partnership with different stakeholders (clear licensing agreement) Stockolm 11 June 2001

More Related