1 / 24

MSM serodiscordant couples: an enquiry into their needs

MSM serodiscordant couples: an enquiry into their needs. AIDS 2010 19 July 2010 Kevin Moody International Coordinator / CEO Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+). Outline. Context Approach and Methods MSM Cases Selected results: Reproductive desires Stigma and discrimination

Télécharger la présentation

MSM serodiscordant couples: an enquiry into their needs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MSM serodiscordant couples: an enquiry into their needs AIDS 2010 19 July 2010 Kevin MoodyInternational Coordinator / CEO Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)

  2. Outline • Context • Approach and Methods • MSM Cases • Selected results: • Reproductive desires • Stigma and discrimination • Recommendations and conclusion

  3. Research tends to have a biomedical focus • Epidemiology & factors associated with HIV discordance • Factors associated with immunity (e.g. why some individuals with repeated exposure to HIV remain uninfected)

  4. Paucity of research on psycho-social aspects of HIV discordance • Discordant couples use to sustain their relationships • Sexual & reproductive choices • Strategies for preventing HIV transmission • Prevention support needs, as most interventions target individualsrather than couples

  5. Aim and objectives Gather preliminary information about the coping strategies and choices made by couples in long-term HIV-discordant relationships (one partner HIV-positive, other partner HIV-negative) in order to inform policy and programmes, specifically: • Child-bearing & child-rearing choices made; • Sexual behaviour & coping strategies; • Psycho-social support & HIV prevention needs.

  6. Study Participants and Eligibility • Countries: South Africa, Tanzania, Ukraine; • Discordant couples in long-term relationships (min 1yr) with disclosure at least 1 year previously; • Both partners required to be 18 years or older and consent to participate; • Written voluntary informed consent obtained; • No names or personal identifiers recorded.

  7. Measurement • Psychological & social support • Children & reproductive choices • Stigma & discrimination • Sexual practices • Biographical info • HIV status & testing history • Current relationship • Children • Health • Involvement in HIV-related activities • Relationship history • Communication about HIV & discordant status • Service use & service needs

  8. Couple demographics (1) • 51 couples recruited: 26 in South Africa; 10 in Tanzania & 15 in Ukraine; • 48 heterosexual couples. In South Africa 2 gay couples & 1 lesbian couple; • Mean age 34 years (range 20 to 54 years); • Couples in current relationship for mean of 6 years; • 83% cohabiting. 58% had formalised their relationship through marriage or equivalent.

  9. Couple demographics (2) • Positive partners were predominantly female in South Africa and Tanzania, and predominantly male in the Ukraine; • Thirty-seven of 51 HIV-positive participants (73%) were on antiretroviral treatment: - South Africa: 21/26, 81% - Tanzania: 6/10, 60% - Ukraine: 10/15, 67% • The mean number of years on medication was three years, with a range of 2 weeks to 9 years; • 36% of participants knew their status before the start of their current relationship.

  10. MSM Cases • 2 MSM couples – not a representative sample • Couple #1 – relationship for “6-3/4 years” • Couple #2 – relationship for 9 months • At least one partner has had previous experience in +/- relationships • One couple working and economically stable; other couple unemployed

  11. Desire for children – M/F • Individuals without children were more likely to desire children (74%) than those who already had one or more children (36%). • 47% of HIV-positive respondents expressed a desire to have a child or additional children.

  12. Desire for children – M/M • Neither couple wants children; • One partner of couple #1 would consider but only if it were possible to have own biological child; • One partner of couple #2 would consider adoption but have concerns about financial situation.

  13. Children & child-bearing decisions – M/F • “Sometimes my partner blames me for being HIV positive. I plan to have a child in future, but for now [we] use a condom” (HIV-positive woman, Couple 1, Tanzania). • “Yes. The hospital has advised us that the best way to do it [have children]is through IVF. That costs money and we are saving now. It would be great if there was an organisation to support couples who wish to have IVF.” — HIV-negative man, South Africa (couple 4)

  14. Desire for children by parental status, South Africa and Tanzania

  15. Children & child-bearing decisions – M/M • “I would have to think and be very careful about going into that one. It has come up before and I feel that if I were to have a child ... What happens if or when my partner dies ... I would have to be responsible and support this child. How would I cope with that ... For now .. No I don’t think so” (HIV-negative man, Couple 24 (MSM Couple 1), South Africa).

  16. Stigma & discrimination experiences – M/F • Stigma & discrimination reported by 8/39 (21%) in South Africa, and 12/20 (60%) in Tanzania • “I was discriminated against by my previous partner… I was also rejected by my friends I was living with. I used to have separate eating utensils.”— HIV-positive woman, South Africa (couple 2) • “Yes, sometimes friends blame me saying, why are you living with an HIV-positive woman. You are still young, you can get another woman.” — HIV-negative man, Tanzania (couple 1)

  17. Stigma & discrimination experiences – M/M • “I don’t recall, I think I’ve experienced more discrimination being gay than being HIV-positive. I would in work disclose... OK wait, just hold on. How can I forget about the insurance thing... I was rejected by all insurance companies [when] applying for life insurance. [Given that I work with many insurance companies], I thought I could go through certain channels via the connection that I have but I was still shut down.” — HIV-positive man, South Africa (couple 24; MSM couple #1)

  18. Strengths & limitations • Strengths • Quantitative & qualitative • Separate interviews with both partners & combined interview * Important insights gained * Complexities & contradictions can be explored • Limitations • Couples recruited purposively • Limited number • Sample included only those who agreed to participate (several couples in SA unwilling to participate) * Select group so findings not generalisable

  19. Conclusions & recommendations • Needs of HIV-discordant couples have received insufficient attention. Need for: • Greater policy focus; • Services for couples; • Research: both epidemiology and social science. • Need to shift from mostly individual focus to greater couple focus in HIV policies & programmes

  20. Conclusions & recommendations • Provide sexual and reproductive health services in a supportive and non-discriminatory environment: - Counseling about reproductive options for discordant couples who want children • Address stigma and discrimination: - Engage couples in the HIV response - Support groups • Need for health service & psychological support

  21. Specific MSM Conclusions & recommendations • Address sexual and reproductive health needs and options of MSM sero-discordant couples • SRHR Literacy – prevention options; PEP; PrEP; ART as prevention • Information about adoption; options for biological children • Address stigma and discrimination • Programmes to address double stigma • MSM talk a lot about sex throughout their relationships • Differences in individual versus couple interviews – especially around safer sex and sexual practices less with MSM couples • Continuous discussion seems to reduce tension – how to translate this to the heterosexual experience?

  22. Lessons Learnt • In general the experiences of MSM are very similar to those of their heterosexual counterparts; • More research needed on the experiences and needs of MSM sero-discordant couples; • While not transferable directly, MSM and Heterosexual approaches to sexual and reproductive choices should be examined for adaptability to each others’ situation; • Need also to examine the effects of double stigma for MSM but also for other key populations.

  23. Acknowledgements • GNP+ wish to thank the researchers in this study: LaetitiaRispel, Carol Medcalf and AllaniseCloete. • We wish to thank the 51 couples in the three countries for the time spent in interviews and the valuable insights provided and the following individuals for assistance with various components of the study: • South Africa: Debbie Mopedi, Nico Jacobs, Jonathan Berger, Professor Jeffrey Wing, Drs Alan Karstaedt, AshrafCoovadia and Duane Blaauw • Tanzania: Blanche Pitt, Dr BenedictaMduma, CayusMrina, ScholasticaSpendi and Suzan Kipuyo • Ukraine: Olga Gvozdetska, TetyanaSosidko, NataliyaSalabai, Drs Ulrich Laukamm-Josten and YuriyKobyshcha • We are grateful to all people living with HIV who supported and took part in this study.

  24. For more information please contact kmoody@gnpplus.net Or visit www.gnpplus.net

More Related