1 / 14

Lessons learned from Japan on Soil Contamination Policy and Implementation

Lessons learned from Japan on Soil Contamination Policy and Implementation. AECEN Regional Forum. Masanori Kobayashi Coordinator Nusa Dua, Indonesia 24 – 26 November 2008. Ashio Copper Mine Pollution. Copper mining intensified in 19 th Century Iron Oxide – Sulfuric Acid contaminated areas

turner
Télécharger la présentation

Lessons learned from Japan on Soil Contamination Policy and Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lessons learned from Japan on Soil Contamination Policy and Implementation AECEN Regional Forum Masanori Kobayashi Coordinator Nusa Dua, Indonesia 24 – 26 November 2008

  2. Ashio Copper Mine Pollution Copper mining intensified in 19th Century Iron Oxide – Sulfuric Acidcontaminated areas Sickness exemplified by ophthalmic disorder illness and killed over 1,000

  3. Developed law and institutional mechanisms for tackling soil contamination – brown field • In 2002, Japan enacted the Soil Contamination Countermeasures Act that has been developed based on the lessons drawn from Europe and North America taking into account Japan’s socio-economic conditions, • 5 year review have been conducted, and further reforms were recommended, • Prefecture government has adopted more stringent ordinance thereby obliging a seller of over 1,000 ha. to conduct soil contamination survey.

  4. Mechanism of soil contamination Effluent from factories Soil contamination Illegal dumping Underground water contamination Toxic substance flows through air, water, agricultural crops and fish →health damage/ecosystem damage

  5. Japan’s Soil Contamination Countermeasures ActKey Provisions Objective To implement countermeasures to soil contamination for protecting health through assessing contamination and preventing the damage of human health Survey - At the time of abandoning the facility using toxic substance (Art.3) - When the prefectural government detects the risk of damaging human health by soil contamination (Art.4) Designation When contamination exceeds the standard, the site is designated under the Act, and it is publicly announced (Art.5) Restriction on land and its use change Obliged to report to the prefectural government and to be regulated (Art.9) Removal of contamination Polluters or owners obliged to remove contamination and cleanse soil (Art.7)

  6. Japan’s Soil Contamination Countermeasures ActPerformance (Feb. 2003 – Feb 2008) Surveyed land sites 898 cases Designated sites 259 Sites declared to require contamination removal 63 (33 removed, 30 in the process of removal or under consideration, 0 – no action) Sites declared not to require contamination removal W196 (111 treated, 62 in the process of treatment or under consideration, 23 – no action) Lifting the designation of sites under the Act 128

  7. Surveyed site cases Number of surveyed site cases Cases that remain within the standards 1991 Soil contamination standard was set Cases that exceed the standards Feb 2003 Act enacted

  8. Number of surveys in 2006 Obliged by ordinances 11% Obliged by the Act 3% Surveyed 14,032 cases Voluntary 86%

  9. Undertaken measured No. of cases Measuring underground water quality Containment Removal of contaminated soil Entrance prohibition Cleansing at the site Covering

  10. Whereabouts of removed contaminated soil Storing facility Removed contaminated soil Non-certified treatment plant Certified treatment plant Cement factory Final disposal

  11. Various supporting measures • Real estate – soil contamination risk/cost is integrated in the land price • Finance – when making loans, financial institutions take into account the soil contamination risk/cost • Accounting – soil contamination risk/cost is accounted in the financial statement

  12. Financial assistance to soil contamination countermeasures Governmental contricutions Prefectural Government Fund Land owner Non-governmental contributions

  13. Recent lawsuit case – Seiko Epson vs Ohji Paper SE bought land from Ohji P and it turned out that the soil was contaminated with dioxin and PCB SE estimates that 9,200 tons of contaminate soil would require removal/cleansing Have taken measures to remove/cleanse contaminated soil Sought 640 million JPY(6.4 million USD) for damages Declared on 8 July 2008 that Ohji must pay 589,75850 (5.9 million USD)

  14. Future challenges ○Promoting rational countermeasures based on the type of risks ・Categorizing designated sites, and disseminating info on the status ・Assessment based on land use types ・Checking countermeasures plans ○Economic instruments ・City planners, real estate agents, accountants ○Scope of Act ・ For preserving safe and comfortable land ○Information sharing mechanisms ・Management sheet on removed soil ・Enforcement measures on illegal cases ○Ensuring sound treatment of removed soil ○Enhancing accuracy/credibility of surveys and countermeasures ○Prevention of soil contamination http://www.env.go.jp/water/dojo/sesaku_kondan/rep080331/gaiyo.pdf

More Related