1 / 4

Comparison of the Project Dissemination Reports period: 01 04 2006 – 30 06 2006

Comparison of the Project Dissemination Reports period: 01 04 2006 – 30 06 2006. Coordinating institution Klaipeda College of Social Sciences Project coordinator Jurate Raisyte 06 2006, Klaipeda.

umberto-potter
Télécharger la présentation

Comparison of the Project Dissemination Reports period: 01 04 2006 – 30 06 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of the Project Dissemination Reports period: 01 04 2006 – 30 06 2006 Coordinating institution Klaipeda College of Social Sciences Project coordinator Jurate Raisyte 06 2006, Klaipeda

  2. The means of dissemination project partners have used for the period of four months (between two partner meetings) • GiovanEuropa and Resources Ltd. • Web site • E – mails • Local meetings • Newsletter • Brochures • Newspapers • Klaipeda College of Social Sciences • Website (description of the project in college website) • E – mails (letters to some local institutions with different kind queries according the migration etc.) • Leaflets • Presentation of the project to other project partners during the meeting • Meeting with local newspapers (“Klaipeda”, “Vakarų ekspresas” during the meeting in Klaipeda on 30th of June) • Centre for Development of Education • Mails to national partners about the project • Updating the common and national website • Dissemination of the newsletter • Meetings in local organisations

  3. The most significant results/benefits gained by organisations at dissemination points of this project period • GiovanEuropa and Resources Ltd. • We have spread other information on the project during local meetings. • We have realised an interview for a weekly local journal (to be published in the next days). • We have promoted the European partnership and developed other possible local partnerships. • We have realized a meeting with local authorities. (a Contact Seminar in Portugal - next 27 - 31 July). • Klaipeda College of Social Sciences • Contacts by e – mail some local and governmental institutions for material about immigrants and immigration situation in order to put in the project website. • The information was spread on the project to other partners from other projects during the meeting time. Received feedback and comments, some questions showed importance of this project and final products. • Centre for Development of Education • Establishing a common website for the project with common links and issues across the European boarders with the involved partners • Establishing a virtual forum in which the partners involved could address problems, save documents and communicate • Establishing a common newsletter for the project, addressing all partner institutions and countries • Establishing good partnership relations to the partners in the project.

  4. Dissemination results of all partners • Meetings, short presentations etc. to the audience were used by all the partners more actively comparing with last dissemination report. • Italian partners have met some local newspapers, College of Social Sciences invited some local newspapers to project meeting in Klaipeda.

More Related