1 / 25

Role of Arterial Embolization in Non-Operative Management of Splenic Injuries

Role of Arterial Embolization in Non-Operative Management of Splenic Injuries. Jamaica Hospital Trauma Conference July 21 st , 2014 Greg Eckenrode. ADVANCING SCIENCE, ENHANCING LIFE. Management of Traumatic Spleen Injuries. Historically, nearly all splenic injuries were managed operatively

umed
Télécharger la présentation

Role of Arterial Embolization in Non-Operative Management of Splenic Injuries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Role of Arterial Embolization in Non-Operative Management of Splenic Injuries Jamaica Hospital Trauma Conference July 21st, 2014 Greg Eckenrode ADVANCING SCIENCE, ENHANCING LIFE

  2. Management of Traumatic Spleen Injuries • Historically, nearly all splenic injuries were managed operatively • Non-operative management developed in the pediatic population in the late 1960s • Increasing prevalence in adult population since the 1980s • Currently 50-70% of splenic injuries Stein DM, Scalea TM J Intensive Care Med. 2006;21(5):296.

  3. Operative Management • Hemodynamically unstable patients with evidence of abdominal bleeding • Positive FAST or DPA/DPL • Patients requiring abdominal exploration for other injuries • Intraperitoneal free air • Signs of peritonitis

  4. Operative Management • Hemodynamically stable patients • CT findings of contrast extravasation or vascular blush • High grade injuries (generally IV-V) • Age > 55 • Unable to safely observe patient

  5. Conventional Non-Operative Management • Admit to monitored care setting • Bed rest, NPO • Serial Hgb/Hct every 6 hours for 24 hours • Frequent vital signs, serial abdominal exams

  6. Splenic Angiography and Embolization • First applied to traumatic splenic injuries in 1995 • Multiple techniques • Distal selective • Proximal • Both • Intended to improve success of non-operative management

  7. Clinical Questions • Does splenic artery angiography and embolization improve non-operative management outcomes? • Which patients should undergo angiography and embolization?

  8. Western Trauma Association • 4 L1 trauma centers in the United States • 155 patients who underwent angiography and embolization for pseudoaneurysm, active bleeding on CT, significant hemopertoneum, and high grade injuries • Compared against the results of the Eastern Trauma Association study, which used conventional observation

  9. Comparison Results Haan, et al; J Trauma. 2004 Mar;56(3):542-7.

  10. Ullevaal University Hospital: 2006 • In 2002, implemented policy that all patients with splenic injury Grades III-V or ongoing bleeding underwent arterial embolization • Compared to all splenic injuries from 2000-2002, when arterial embolization was no performed at the hospital Gaardner, C, et al; J Trauma. 2006 Jul;61(1):192-8

  11. Study Outcomes

  12. Complications

  13. Multicenter Variation: 2010 • Compared 4 L1 trauma centers with variation in rates of splenic artery embolization in non-operative management • Rates ranged from 19% to 1% • Compared rates of splenic salvage and non-operative failure Bannerjee, et al; J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):69-74

  14. Population Comparison Bannerjee, et al; J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):69-74

  15. Management Comparison Bannerjee, et al; J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):69-74

  16. Splenic Salvage Rate Bannerjee, et al; J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):69-74

  17. Wake Forest - 2014 • Single site L1 Trauma Center • Prior to 2010, angiography and embolization performed for CT contrast blush • Starting in 2010, prospectively performed angiography and embolization on all Grade III-IV splenic injuries • Compared non-operative failure rates against recent historical controls from 2007-2009 period Miller, et al; J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Apr;218(4):644-8

  18. Study Group Comparison Miller, et al; J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Apr;218(4):644-8

  19. Study Results • 2010-2012: Non-operative failure rate of 5% • Failure rate of 25% in 16 protocol deviations (p=0.02) • 2007-2009: Non-operative failure rate of 15% (p=0.04)

  20. Conclusions • In historical comparisons, patients with splenic injuries who are candidates for non-operative management have better outcomes when SAE is utilized • Centers which perform a higher rate of SAE have higher rates of spelic salvage and lower rates of non-operative management failure

  21. Conclusions • Centers which implement a standard protocol mandating SAE for non-operative splenic injuries experience decreased rates of of non-operative failure and increased rates of splenic salvage

  22. Future Directions • No prospective, head-to-head randomized clinical trial of SAE in non-operative splenic injuries • Limited data with respect to cost effectiveness

  23. Splenic Injury Grading • Grade I: • Hematoma: Subcapsular, < 10% of surface area • Laceration: Capsular tear < 1 cm depth • Grade II • Hematoma: Subcapsular, 10 - 50 % of surface area • Laceration: Capsular tear 1 - 3 cm depth not involving trebecular vessel

  24. Splenic Injury Grading • Grade III • Hematoma • Subcapsular, > 50% of surface area • Subcapsular, expanding • Ruptured subcapsular or parenchymal • Intraparenchymal > 5cm • Laceration • > 3cm depth • Involving trabecular vessel

  25. Splenic Injury Grading • Grade IV • Laceration: segmental or hilar vessels with > 25% devascularization • Grade V • Hematoma: shattered spleen • Laceration: total devascularization

More Related