1 / 59

Patient Dose Management -Equipment & Physical Factors

Patient Dose Management -Equipment & Physical Factors. L 5. Educational Objectives. Physical factors & challenge to dose management Understanding the role of operator in patient dose management How to manage patient dose using equipment factors.

urania
Télécharger la présentation

Patient Dose Management -Equipment & Physical Factors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Patient Dose Management -Equipment & Physical Factors L 5

  2. Educational Objectives • Physical factors & challenge to dose management • Understanding the role of operator in patient dose management • How to manage patient dose using equipment factors Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  3. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management To create image some x rays must interact with tissues while others completely penetrate through the patient. Non-uniform beam exits patient, pattern of non-uniformity is the image X rays interact in patient, rendering beam non-uniform Spatially uniform beam enters patient Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK and Archer BR. Minimizing Risks from Fluoroscopic Radiation, R. M. Partnership, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  4. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Because image production requires that beam interact differentially in tissues, beam entering patient must be of much greater intensity than that exiting the patient. Only a small percentage (typically ~1%) penetrate through to create the image. As beam penetrates patient, x rays interact in tissue causing biological changes Beam entering patient typically ~100x more intense than exit beam Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK and Archer BR. Minimizing Risks from Fluoroscopic Radiation, R. M. Partnership, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  5. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Lesson: Entrance skin tissue receives highest dose of x rays and is at greatest risk for injury. Only a small percentage (typically ~1%) penetrate through to create the image. As beam penetrates patient x rays interact in tissue causing biological changes Beam entering patient typically ~100x more intense than exit beam in average size patient Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK and Archer BR. Minimizing Risks from Fluoroscopic Radiation, R. M. Partnership, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  6. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management X-ray intensity decreases rapidly with distance from source; conversely, intensity increases rapidly with closer distances to source. 1 unit of intensity 4 units of intensity 16 units of intensity 64 units of intensity 8.8 cm 17.5 cm 35 cm 70 cm Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  7. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Lesson: Understanding how to take advantage of the rapid changes in dose rate with distance from source is essential to good radiation management. Practical applications are demonstrated in following slides. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  8. 2 units of intensity 4 units of intensity 16 units of intensity 64 units of intensity Physical factors and challenges to radiation management All other conditions unchanged, moving patient toward or away from the x-ray tube can significantly affect dose rate to the skin Lesson: Keep the x-ray tube at the practicable maximum distance from the patient. Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  9. 2 units of intensity Image Receptor Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Physical factors and challenges to radiation management All other conditions unchanged, moving image receptor toward patient lowers radiation output rate and lowers skin dose rate. 4 units of intensity Image Receptor Image Receptor Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  10. 2 units of intensity Image Receptor Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Physical factors and challenges to radiation management 4 units of intensity Image Receptor Image Receptor Lesson: Keep the image intensifier as close to the patient as is practicable for the procedure. Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  11. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Positioning anatomy of concern at the isocenter permits easy reorientation of the C-arm but usually fixes distance of the skin from the source, negating any ability to change source-to-skin distance. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  12. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management When isocenter technique is employed, move the image intensifier as close to the patient as practicable to limit dose rate to the entrance skin surface. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  13. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Small percentages of dose reduction can result in large savings in skin dose for prolonged procedures. The advantages of a 20% dose savings are shown in this Table. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  14. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Lesson: Actions that produce small changes in skin dose accumulation result in important and considerable dose savings, sometimes resulting in the difference between severe and mild skin dose effects or no effect. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  15. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Large percentages of dose reduction result in enormous savings in skin dose when procedures are prolonged. The advantages of a factor of 2 dose savings are shown in this Table. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  16. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Thicker tissue masses absorb more radiation, thus much more radiation must be used to penetrate the large patient. Risk to skin is greater in larger patients! [ESD = Entrance Skin Dose] 15 cm 20 cm 25 cm 30 cm ESD = 1 unit ESD = 2-3 units ESD = 4-6 units ESD = 8-12 units Example: 2 Gy Example: 4-6 Gy Example: 8-12 Gy Example: 16-24 Gy Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  17. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Thicker tissue masses absorb more radiation, thus much more radiation must be used when steep beam angles are employed. Risk to skin is greater with steeper beam angles! Quiz: what happens when cranial tilt is employed? Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  18. 40 cm Thick Oblique vs Thin PA geometry 100 cm Dose rate: 20 – 40 mGyt/min Dose rate: ~250 mGyt/min 80 cm 100 cm 50 cm

  19. A word about collimation What does collimation do? Collimation confines the x-ray beam to an area of the users choice. Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK and Archer BR. Minimizing Risks from Fluoroscopic Radiation, R. M. Partnership, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  20. A word about collimation Why is narrowing the field-of-view beneficial? • Reduces stochastic risk to patient by reducing volume of tissue at risk • Reduces scatter radiation at image receptor to improve image contrast • Reduces ambient radiation exposure to in-room personnel • Reduces potential overlap of fields when beam is reoriented Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  21. A word about collimation What collimation does not do – It does NOT reduce dose to the exposed portion of patient’s skin In fact, dose at the skin entrance site increases, sometimes by a factor of 50% or so, depending on conditions. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  22. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Lesson: Reorienting the beam distributes dose to other skin sites and reduces risk to single skin site. Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  23. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Lesson: Reorienting the beam in small increments may leave area of overlap in beam projections, resulting in large accumulations for overlap area (red area). Good collimation can reduce this effect. Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  24. Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Conclusion: Orientation of beam is usually determined and fixed by clinical need. When practical, reorientation of the beam to a new skin site can lessen risk to skin. Overlapping areas remaining after reorientation are still at high risk. Good collimation reduces the overlap area. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  25. Dose rate dependence on image receptor field-of-view or magnification mode. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  26. 12" (32 cm) 100 9" (22 cm) 200 6" (16 cm) 300 4.5" (11 cm) 400 RELATIVE PATIENT ENTRANCE DOSE RATE FOR SOME UNITS INTENSIFIER Field-of-view (FOV) Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  27. How input dose rate changes with different FOVs depends on machine design and must be verified by a medical physicist to properly incorporate use into procedures. • A typical rule is to use the least magnification necessary for the procedure, but this does not apply to all machines. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  28. Unnecesary Body Mass in Field of View Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  29. Unnecessary body parts in direct radiation field Unnecessary body mass in beam Reproduced with permission from Vañó et al, Brit J Radiol 1998, 71, 510-516 Reproduced from Wagner – Archer, Minimizing Risks from Fluoroscopic X Rays, 3rd ed, Houston, TX, R. M. Partnership, 2000 Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  30. Wagner and Archer. Minimizing Risks from Fluoroscopic X Rays. Surgical flap At 3 wks At 6.5 mos Following ablation procedure with arm in beam near port and separator cone removed. About 20 minutes of fluoroscopy. Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK and Archer BR. Minimizing Risks from Fluoroscopic Radiation, R. M. Partnership, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  31. Big problem! Arm positioning – important and not easy! • Lessons: • Output increases because arm is in beam. • Arm receives intense rate because it is so close to source. Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK and Archer BR. Minimizing Risks from Fluoroscopic Radiation, R. M. Partnership, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  32. Examples of Injury when Female Breast is Exposed to Direct Beam Reproduced with permission from MacKenzie, Brit J Ca 1965; 19, 1 - 8 Reproduced with permission from Granel et al, Ann Dermatol Venereol 1998; 125; 405 - 407 Reproduced with permission from Vañó, Br J Radiol 1998; 71, 510 - 516. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  33. Lesson Learned: • Keep unnecessary body parts, especially arms and female breasts, out of the direct beam. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  34. Beam Energy Filter & kVp Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  35. Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Beam energy: X rays used in fluoroscopy systems have a spectrum of energies that can be controlled to manipulate image quality. How a system manipulates the spectrum depends on how the system is designed. Some systems permit the operator to select filtration schemes Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  36. In general, every x-ray system produces a range of energies as depicted in the diagram below: Beam energy: Low energy x rays: high image contrast but high skin dose Middle energy x rays: high contrast for iodine and moderate skin dose High energy x rays: poor contrast and low dose Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  37. The goal is to shape the beam energy spectrum for the best contrast at the lowest dose. An improved spectrum with 0.2 mm Copper filtration is depicted by the dashes: Beam energy: Low-contrast high energy x rays are reduced by lower kVp Filtration reduces poorly penetrating low energy x rays Middle energy x rays are retained for best compromise on image quality and dose Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  38. kVp Beam energy: kVp controls the high-energy end of the spectrum and is usually adjusted by the system according to patient size and imaging needs: Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  39. Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Beam energy: Filtration controls the low-energy end of the spectrum. Some systems have a fixed filter that is not adjustable; others have a set of filters that are used under differing imaging schemes. Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  40. Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Filters: The advantages of filters are that they can reduce skin dose by enormous factors. (Factors of about 2 or more.)The disadvantages are that they reduce overall beam intensity and require heavy-duty x-ray tubes to produce sufficient radiation outputs that can adequately penetrate the filters. Beam energy spectrum before and after adding 0.2 mm of Cu filtration. Note the reduced intensity and change in energies. To regain intensity tube current must increase, requiring special x-ray tube. Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  41. Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Physical factors and challenges to radiation management If filters reduce intensity excessively, image quality is compromised, usually in the form of increased motion blurring or excessive quantum mottle. Lesson: To use filters optimally, systems must be designed to produce appropriate beam intensities with variable filter options that depend on patient size and the imaging task. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  42. Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Modern fluoroscopy systems employ special filtration to reduce skin dose and, for detail cardiologic work, employ a set of filters with varying properties that are switched by the system according to imaging needs. Some schemes are selectable by the user. Conclusion: Users must establish protocols for use of manufacturer supplied filter options that provide the best compromise in patient dose and image quality for each machine employed. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  43. Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Fluoroscopic kVp: • Fluoroscopic kVp in modern systems is controlled by the system. The user might be able to influence the way the system works: • By selecting various dose rate selection options • By selecting a kVp floor Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  44. Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Lessons regarding kVp floor: • Available on a few machines • Sets kVp below which system does not operate • Unit usually operates at floor kVp unless regulatory dose rates are challenged due to poor beam penetration. • If set too low, dose rates are always excessive because system always operates at maximum rates Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  45. Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Physical factors and challenges to radiation management The kVp floor: Lesson: Be sure kVp floor, if available, is set at appropriately high value to assure system operates at moderate to low dose rates. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  46. Pulsed Fluoroscopy Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  47. Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Understanding Variable Pulsed Fluoroscopy Background: dynamic imaging captures many still images every second and displays these still-frame images in real-time succession to produce the perception of motion. How these images are captured and displayed can be manipulated to manage both dose rate to the patient and dynamic image quality.Standard imaging captures and displays 25 - 30 images per second. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  48. Continuous fluoroscopy In conventional continuous-beam fluoroscopy there is an inherent blurred appearance of motion because the exposure time of each image lasts the full 1/30th of a second at 30 frames per second. Images 30 images in 1 second X rays Continuous stream of x rays produces blurred images in each frame Reproduced with permission from Wagner LK and Archer BR. Minimizing Risks from Fluoroscopic Radiation, R. M. Partnership, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  49. Pulsed fluoroscopy, no dose reduction Pulsed fluoroscopy produces sharp appearance of motion because each of 30 images per second is captured in a pulse or snapshot (e.g., 1/100th of a second). Images 30 images in 1 second X rays Each x-ray pulse shown above has greater intensity than continuous mode, but lasts for only 1/100th of a second; no x rays are emitted between pulses; dose to patient is same as that with continuous Reproduced with permission fromWagner LK and Archer BR. Minimizing Risks from Fluoroscopic Radiation, R. M. Partnership, Houston, TX 2004. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

  50. Design of fluoroscopic equipment for proper radiation control Physical factors and challenges to radiation management Pulsed imaging controls: Displaying 25 – 30 picture frames per second is usually adequate for the transition from frame to frame to appear smooth. This is important for entertainment purposes, but not necessarily required for medical procedures. Manipulation of frame rate can be used to produce enormous savings in dose accumulation. Lecture 5: Patient dose management

More Related