1 / 18

ExOR: Opportunistic Multi-Hop Routing for Wireless Networks

ExOR: Opportunistic Multi-Hop Routing for Wireless Networks. Yin Lin. b y Sanjit Biswas and Robert Morris. Agenda. Motivation Design Evaluation Summary. Traditional Wireless Routing = Wired Routing. ExOR: multi-hop unicast wireless routing protocol

urbain
Télécharger la présentation

ExOR: Opportunistic Multi-Hop Routing for Wireless Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ExOR: Opportunistic Multi-Hop Routing for Wireless Networks Yin Lin by SanjitBiswas and Robert Morris

  2. Agenda • Motivation • Design • Evaluation • Summary

  3. Traditional Wireless Routing = Wired Routing • ExOR: multi-hop unicast wireless routing protocol • Traditional: fixed routing sequence • Choose best sequence • Always forward through that sequence D B E F A C Routing Table Dst: Destination NH: Next hop

  4. Radios Aren’t Wires • Every packet is broadcast • Reception is probabilistic A B src dst 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 C

  5. Problem:Unnecessary Retransmission B Buffer it ! C A D G E F

  6. Problem: Unnecessary Hops • Only reach N1: result in retransmission • Luckily reach N3: distance wasted Choose “best” forwarder! src N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 dst

  7. Basic Idea : Route After Reception • Buffer received packets • Node closest to dst forward packet B 2.28 F 1.38 A E C 1.17 1.43 D

  8. Forwarder List: Should I Forward? • Distance metric: ETX to dst • Updated dynamically • Sort nodes w.r.t. distance ETX=2.28 ETX=2.28 ETX=2.28 ETX=2.28 ETX=2.28 B B B B B C C C C C ETX=1.17 ETX=1.17 ETX=1.17 ETX=1.17 ETX=1.17 ETX=2.85 ETX=2.85 ETX=2.85 ETX=2.85 ETX=2.85 A A A A A E E E E E ETX=0 ETX=0 ETX=0 ETX=0 ETX=0 D D D D D D Forwarder List ETX=1.43 ETX=1.43 ETX=1.43 ETX=1.43 ETX=1.43 E > C > D > B > A E > C > D > B > A E > C > D > B > A E > C > D > B > A E > C >D> B > A

  9. Batch Map: Who Has Received What? • ExOR operates on batch • Highest-priority node that received packet B C 1.17 2.28 2.85 A E E > C > D > B > A 0 D 1.43

  10. 3-Packet Batch Example B C 1.17 2.28 2.85 A E 0 D E > C >D > B > A 1.43

  11. ExOR: 2x Overall Improvement • Median throughputs: • 240 Kbits/sec for ExOR • 121 Kbits/sec for Traditional 1.0 0.8 0.6 Cumulative Fraction of Node Pairs 0.4 0.2 ExOR Traditional 0 0 200 400 600 800 Throughput (Kbits/sec)

  12. 25 Highest Throughput Pairs 3 Traditional Hops 2.3x 2 Traditional Hops 1.7x 1 Traditional Hop 1.14x 1000 ExOR TraditionalRouting 800 600 Throughput (Kbits/sec) 400 200 0 Node Pair

  13. 25 Lowest Throughput Pairs 1000 ExOR 4 Traditional Hops 3.3x TraditionalRouting 800 600 Throughput (Kbits/sec) 400 200 0 Node Pair Longer Routes

  14. ExOR 7 forwarders 18 links ExOR Uses Links In Parallel Traditional Routing 3 forwarders 4 links

  15. 58% of Traditional Routing transmissions 25% of ExOR transmissions ExOR Moves Packets Farther • ExOR average: 422 meters/transmission • Traditional Routing average: 205 meters/tx 0.6 ExOR Traditional Routing Fraction of Transmissions 0.2 0.1 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (meters)

  16. Cost of ExOR • Memory cost at each node • Overhead # nodes • Choose a subnet

  17. Summary • Exploits radio properties • Send: broadcast • Receive: probabilistic • Solves problems w/ traditional routing • Unnecessary retransmission • Extra hops • Dynamic forwarder choice • Forwarder list – order distances to dst • Batch map – packet sent exactly once • Performance • 2x throughput • Longer & fewer hops Sol: Buffer packets Sol: Choose “best” forwarder

More Related