1 / 19

P13656 Week 6 - SDII Update

P13656 Week 6 - SDII Update. Meeting Agenda. Variable Testing Discuss results Possible future steps Corrosion & Resistance Testing Results and possible influence on the project Cleaning Unit Update Future Steps. Variable Testing. Performed at different starting temperatures

urban
Télécharger la présentation

P13656 Week 6 - SDII Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. P13656 Week 6 - SDII Update

  2. Meeting Agenda • Variable Testing • Discuss results • Possible future steps • Corrosion & Resistance Testing • Results and possible influence on the project • Cleaning Unit Update • Future Steps

  3. Variable Testing • Performed at different starting temperatures • Samples were submerged for 1.5-6 hours • Used CTI hydrogen peroxide solution • Coating removal was visible

  4. Variable Testing Testing Schedule

  5. Variable Testing Testing Data

  6. Visible Results • Increased time in ultrasonic unit decreased amount of coloration • As temperature increased, rate of stripping increased slightly

  7. Increase in Temp Increase in Time

  8. Conductivity Testing • Measured conductivity of peroxide solution from variable testing • Test results obtained • Colorimetry and correlations of base values for check

  9. Conductivity Testing

  10. Conductivity Summary • Correlation between visual results and conductivity results • Colorimetry also expected to support these results • Next steps • Solution lifetime/optimal replacement period • Potential use of conductivity to standardize solution replacement

  11. Corrosion Testing • Used weight loss method • Measuring mass change in stainless steel wire samples • AWG 18 - 316L and 430 SS wire • 6 hour exposure period • Varied conditions and solutions

  12. Corrosion Test Condition Methodology Still bath (20 C) filled with: • H2O - Control • H2O2 - Baseline effect of hydrogen peroxide Sonic bath (50 C) filled with: • H2O - Control • H2O2 - Typical operation • H2O2 + Cl (PVC shavings) - Worst case

  13. T = 50 C T = 20 C

  14. Significance of Corrosion Testing Results • Protection of tank integrity and estimation of tank lifetime • Direct vs. indirect stripping methods • Calculation of tank lifetime when used with certain solutions • Protection of the base metal of the product • Limit uncoated exposure time in ultrasonics • Chlorides (PVC shavings) may have greater effect over longer time frame • Recommend using HCl for future testing

  15. Ultrasonic Unit • Unit has been set up in the test area and is working properly • Heater control located on tank

  16. Function Generation Unit • Power selection • Timer • Sweep function varies power • Overrides unit's onboard controls (excepting heat) • User manual is on EDGE: https://edge.rit.edu/edge/P13656/public/Phase_II_Documents/Pete/SC%20Operator's%20Guide.pdf

  17. Future Steps • Prepare detailed instruction manual for the cleaner • Process conditions and optimization • Test samples in the full-sized unit (use more realistic samples if available) • Technical paper and poster for Imagine RIT

More Related