1 / 76

Experimental Overview of B Physics

Experimental Overview of B Physics. Paoti Chang National Taiwan University 2004/11/19 Mini-workshop on Flavor Physics. Introduction. • Bottom quark was discovered in 1977.

vail
Télécharger la présentation

Experimental Overview of B Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Experimental Overview of B Physics Paoti Chang National Taiwan University 2004/11/19 Mini-workshop on Flavor Physics 1

  2. Introduction • Bottom quark was discovered in 1977. • Experiments tried to study B physics in the 80s/90s. − Fixed Target Experiments  Hard to trigger and dirty env. − e+ e-  U(4S)  BB Productive (CLEO and ARGUS ) −e+e-  Z/WW  bb  Good but limited by statistics − pp  bb  Leptons, secondary vertices (CDF) Need luminosity; no p0, h  LHC, LHCb and BTeV in 21 centry 2

  3. CP Violation • CP: Ccharge conjugate; Pparity CPV diff. prop. for matter and anti-matt. • Atiny CP Violation was observed in the Kaon system (1964). Obs. another CPV evidence 35 years later. • In 1973, Kobayashi & Masakawa proposed six quark flavor. 3

  4. KM Mechanism • CPV arises from a complex phase in the quark mixing matrix. = 4

  5. Motivation • CPV may be large in the B meson system. (B  J/y KS) • Is CP violation only due to a single weak phase? • Is there any new interaction beyond the standard model? • Measure the three angels • and size of the triangle. • Measure B meson property. • Rare B decays provide a • rich ground to understand • B decays. • It’s useful to search for • new physics. h r 5

  6. CP Violation in B Meson Decays Indirect CP Violation (Mixing + Tree interference) 6

  7. Mixing induced CPV Asymmetry  In Hadron collider experiments, Dt is the B0 decay time.  Measure the primary vertex (collision point) and decay vertex • In U(4S) experiments, Dt is the decay time differences between B0 and B0. How to measure Dt? 7

  8. Asymmetric e+e- Collider Piermaria Oddone 8

  9. Indirect CPV illustration • The difference in the t distributions indicates ICPV. • sin21 corresponds to the amplitude of ACP. • If the area of the red and blue are different  DCPV. • Search for DCPV in B decays to flavor specific states. 9

  10. Requirements to do B physics • Lots of Bs B factory • Able to reconstruct B vertices  Silicon D. • Good Particle identification • Able to detect photons and electrons  CsI(Tl) detector • Good m coverage and able to measure KL • Fast DAQ and lots of CPU and storages. 10

  11. The PEPII Collider (magnetic separation) On resonance: 221 fb-1 Int(L dt)= 244 fb-1 9 x 3.0 GeV; L=(9.2 x 1033)/cm2/sec 11

  12. The KEKB Collider (8 x 3.5 GeV, X angle) World record: L=(1.4 x1034)/cm2/sec Int(L dt)= 323 fb-1 On-resonance 295 fb-1 12

  13. Belle Collaboration Masashi Hazumi (KEK) Masashi Hazumi (KEK) ~54 Institutes ~300 members 13

  14. Superconducting Coil (1.5T) Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT)[5 layers] e+ (3 GeV) e- (9 GeV) Drift Chamber [40 stereo lyrs](DCH) CsI(Tl) Calorimeter (EMC) [6580 crystals]. Cherenkov Detector (DIRC) [144 quartz bars, 11000 PMTs] Instrumented Flux Return (IFR) [Iron interleaved with RPCs]. BaBar Detector 14

  15. Belle Detector Aerogel Cherenkov cnt. n=1.015~1.030 SC solenoid 1.5T 3.5GeV e+ CsI(Tl) 16X0 TOF counter 8GeV e- EFC m / KL detection 14/15 lyr. RPC+Fe Si vtx. det. 3 lyr. DSSD 15

  16. B Meson Reconstruction • B candidates are identified by the beam constrained mass(Mb) 16

  17. Flavor Tagging Algorithm r =(1-2w)MC q = +1 Btag q =   Btag 17

  18. Vertex Reconstruction BD*ln Validated by B lifetimes tB0 = 1.55  0.02ps tB+ = 1.64  0.03ps PDG: 1.55  0.03ps PDG: 1.65  0.03ps 18

  19. Event by Event Likelihood b-flavor tag PDG wrong-tag frac. f= ±1 for CP=1 resolution function B-lifetime studies 19

  20. Results • Measurements on the unitarity triangle – sin(2f1/b) from b  ccs –sin(2f1/b)eff from b sss – f2/a and f3/g • Rare B decays: PP and VV • New particle states • Size of the triangle (Kim’s talk), theoretical interpretations (Li and Cheng), new physics (He) 20

  21. sin(21) Measurement from bccs • 2911 xf = -1 events included in the fit. • J/y KL: 2332 with a purity of 60%; xf = +1 140 fb-1 21

  22. Measurement of sin2f1 (Belle 2003) 140 fb-1 sin2f1=0.733±0.057±0.028 Poor tags |lccs| =1.007±0.041(stat) i.e., consistent with no direct CPV. Good tags 22

  23. Compare CP odd and CP even (Belle 2003) CP = -1 sample sin2f1 = 0.73±0.06 CP = +1 sample (B0gJ/y KL) sin2f1 = 0.80±0.13 23

  24. Measurement of f1(b) from BaBar J/ψ KL signal J/ψ X background Non-J/ψ background ΔE [MeV] 24

  25. (cc) KS (CP odd) modes BaBar Results with 205 fb-1 J/ψ KL (CP even) mode sin2β = 0.722  0.040 (stat)  0.023 (sys) 25

  26. 250 fb-1 Belle Update with 253 fb-1 S = 0.722  0.040 ± 0.023 A = 0.950  0.031  0.013 26

  27. Dream of New Physics with CPV in Rare Decays • In the SM for the pure bs transition, • sin(2 1)eff (bsss) = sin(2 1)(bccs) • Any deviation may mean new physics. • Decay Modes: B  KS ; B KS ; B KKKS;KsKsKs B f0 KS, wKS • NTU is involved in this search. 27

  28. Hunting for new phases in bs penguins dominant • Large exclusive and inclusive BRs. • New physics comes from the penguin loop. 28

  29. 274M BB pB* CPV in the B f KSdecay fKS fKL purity 0.63 purity 0.17 Nsig= 36 15 Nsig=139 14 fKS+fKL:S(fK0) = +0.06 0.330.09 A(fK0) = +0.080.220.09 ~2.2s away from SM Belle 29

  30. BaBar Result onB f KS 30

  31. S = 0.736 fit B0h’KS& K+K-KS high statistics modes K+K-KS (fexcluded) h’KS Belle Nsig=399 28 Nsig=512 27 h’rg, hp+p- (hgg, p+p-p0) purity 0.56 purity 0.61 CP=+1: 1.03 0.15 0.05 Raw Asymmetry Raw Asymmetry Good tags Good tags (~0.5s @SM) (~1.0s @SM) S = +0.65 0.18 0.04 -S = +0.490.18 0.04 ( ) A = -0.19 0.11 0.05 A = -0.08 0.12 0.07 0.17 0.0 0.17 0.00 31

  32. BaBar Results on KKKs 32

  33. BaBar Results on h′KS/ f0 Ks 33

  34. 274M BB S = 0.736 fit B0wKS& f0(980)KS additional modes Nsig=31 7 Nsig=102 18 purity 0.58 Belle purity 0.56 Raw Asymmetry Good tags Good tags (~0s @SM) (~2.9s @SM) S = +0.75 0.64 -S = -0.470.41 0.08 A = +0.26 0.48 0.15 A = -0.39 0.27 0.08 0.13 0.16 34

  35. S = 0.736 fit Another penguin modeB p0Ks Nsig=168 18 purity 0.55 Raw Asymmetry Good tags 35

  36. TCPV in B0gKsKsKs from Belle (~2.8s @SM) “sin2f1” = -1.26 0.68 0.18 A = +0.54 0.34 0.08 Poor tags Good tags 36

  37. sin2f1(bgsqq) = 0.39  0.11 (Belle) 0.42  0.10 (BABAR) sin2f1(bgsqq)= 0.41  0.07 sin2f1(bgccs) = 0.726  0.037 Summary of f1(b) Measurements World Average (WA) CL = 1.2 10-4 (3.8s) 37

  38. +Loops (penguins) f2 or a Extraction •  measure eff • need to bound |eff-| (shift from loops) • different |Penguin/Tree| for different decays 38

  39. B0p+p- Results 227×106 B pairs 152×106 B pairs 372 signal events 467 signal events LR preliminary S= 1.00 0.21 0.07 -A= -0.58 0.15 0.07 = C 39

  40. B0p+p- Continue • Belle has observed CPV • in B at a level of 5.2 • 3.2 evidence for direct • CPV from Belle • Not supported by BaBar • measurement >3 difference between BABAR and Belle results Average with care! 40

  41. ACP = 0.43  0.51  0.17 0.16 6.0s Observation ofB0p0p0 (227e6 B Pairs) 4.9s (274e6 B Pairs) Signal: 82  16 (6.0s) B = (2.32  ) x 10-6 0.44 0.48 0.22 0.18 First measurements of C00 41

  42. 42

  43. Isospin Correction for 2/ 43

  44. r0p0 r+p- r-p+ • +- is not a CP eigenstate • Cut on Dalitz plot to analyse  bands • Analyse Dalitz plot 44

  45. related to a Low Quality Tag High Quality Tag Quasi two-body Approach Belle Gronau & Zupan hep-ph/0407002 45

  46. CP Violating Observables: Non-CP Observables: Time dependent Dalitz Analysis Constraint on strong phase difference Between Convert measured parameters into CPV observables 46

  47. BABAR a From time-dependent Dalitz Analysis All strong phases And amplitudes extracted from DP [Theoretically Clean: SU(2)] BABAR CONF-04/038 47

  48. Summary on 2/ Measurement 48

  49. 3 () Extraction 49

  50. Gronau London Wyler method • B- D0CPK(*)-, where D0CP is a CP-eigenstate decay (CP+: D0 π+π-, K+K- CP-: D0 Ksπ0) • We have the following observables: • 4 observables (RCP+, RCP-,ACP+, ACP-)  determine 3 unknowns (rB,δB,) 50

More Related