1 / 14

SIKES

SIKES. SIKES. HISTORY: Genesis 1940’s sand pit mining 1950’s Girl Scout camp at Tank Lake; tragedy. 1960’s Sikes family homesteads the land Sikes enterprises: deer leases dumping. SIKES. 1967 Riverdale Community telegram to LBJ

valentine-mcgee
Télécharger la présentation

SIKES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SIKES

  2. SIKES • HISTORY: • Genesis • 1940’s sand pit mining • 1950’s Girl Scout camp at Tank Lake; tragedy. • 1960’s Sikes family homesteads the land • Sikes enterprises: • deer leases • dumping

  3. SIKES • 1967 • Riverdale Community telegram to LBJ • Texas Dept of Water Resources issues / retracts water permit. • Sikes dump closed • 1982 • Floods • sampling shows widespread toxics

  4. SIKES • 1983 SITE ADDED TO NPL • Sikes family temporarily relocated [after fight] • TDWR & EPA start the RI/FS • 1986 RI/FS COMPLETED: • 80,000 cubic yds contaminated soils, • 80,000 cubic yds contaminated sludges • 13,000,000 gallons contaminated water

  5. SIKES • OPTIONS: • $ 0.4 M No Action • $ 23.4 M L/F sludges and soils on site • $ 56.0 M L/F sludges off site, soils on site • $ 53.4 M Incinerate only sludges on site • $ 111.3 M Incinerate sludges on site; L/F soils off site • $ 92.9 M Incinerate sludges and soils on site

  6. SIKES • PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: 7/30/86 TO 8/20/86 • PUBLIC MEETING [130 PEOPLE] 8/7/86 • PRINCIPAL CONCERNS: • Import waste from other sites? • Killer inversions? • Test innovative, cost saving, technologies? • Guarantee permanence? • Property devaluation?

  7. SIKES • WHAT WOULD YOU DO?: • Delay for more accurate testing, experiments with biotreatment, etc? • Guarantee property values? • Guarantee to incinerate only Sikes waste?

  8. SIKES • REMEDIAL DESIGN: 10/86 TO 10/89 • 139 M allocated [150% of ROD] • 5 technically qualified contractors • SOLICITATION: 10/89 problem !

  9. Elected Rep’s Agency Leaders Community State Agency Bidding contractor Other contractors Insurers Need results! Want results Restless @ delay 10% matching $ Over $500K invested Bummed by insurers Spooked by newness SIKESAS PROJECT MANAGER, SHOULD YOU PROCEED?PARTYDESIRE

  10. SIKES • MARCH 1990: RESOLICITATION: • Phase A- ‘construction’ of berms, incinerator, water treatment, access roads, clearing, etc. • Phase B- Operation of cleanup equipment, removal. • SUCCESSFUL RESPONSES: • 4 different firms, joint ventures • Bids ranged from $92 to $99 million

  11. SIKES • OCTOBER ,1990- • Mobilization to field • JANUARY, 1992- • $32 million Phase A completed, • APRIL, 1992- • Trial Burn successful, operations started. • JANUARY, 1995- • Phase B completed [$85 vs $60 million but volume was 360,000 vs 160,000 cu yds]

  12. SIKES … SUMMARY KEY PLAYERS GOALS

  13. SIKES … SUMMARY KEY PLAYERS GOALS INSURERS NO LIABILITY RIVERDALE PEOPLE HEALTH/INCIN. FEARS, PROPERTY $ EPA RPM LAW, PROGRESS STATE 10% MATCH BIDDERS 2ND CHANCE

  14. TELE-ASSIGNMENTS • WHERE DO YOU WANT TO BE IN ONE YEAR?, WHO DO YOU CONTACT ABOUT CHICKENS? [4/7] • NAME 1 - 3 WOULD-BE SIKES PLAYERS …. AND WHY THEY WEREN’T [4/14]

More Related