1 / 13

Bin resolved modeling of ice microphysics

Workshop on Measurement Problems in Ice Clouds Zurich, Switzerland July 5-6, 2013. Bin resolved modeling of ice microphysics. Wolfram Wobrock, Andrea Flossmann. Ice microphysics in clouds. Cotton et al, 2011. MODEL Configuration in 3D. a 3D cloud model with detailed microphysics.

valiant
Télécharger la présentation

Bin resolved modeling of ice microphysics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop on Measurement Problems in Ice Clouds Zurich, Switzerland July 5-6, 2013 Bin resolvedmodeling of icemicrophysics Wolfram Wobrock, Andrea Flossmann

  2. Icemicrophysics in clouds Cotton et al, 2011

  3. MODEL Configuration in 3D a 3D cloud model with detailed microphysics Example: a cumulonimbus cloud Necessity to followateverygridpoint env. 40 classes per cat. => Limitsregarding computer time and storage, in particular for meso-scalemodels

  4. Bulkschemes • 1 Moment schemes: Walko et al (1995): pristineice, snow, aggregates, graupel and hail, 3D Straka, Mansell (2005): 10 icecategories : twoicecrystal habits (column and plate), rimedcloudice, snow (icecrystalaggregates), threecategories of graupelwithdifferentdensities and intercepts, frozen drops, smallhail, and large hail, 3D • 2 Moment schemes: Meyers et al (1997): mixing ratio and number concentration of rain, pristineicecrystals, snow, aggregates, graupel and hail, 3D Seifert et al (2006): cloudice, snowkflakes, graupel, prescribedG distributions, 2D Morrison, Grabowski (2007): mixing ratio due to vapourdeposition, mixingratio due to riming, icenumberconcentration, 2D kinematic

  5. 200µm 500µm 500µm 500µm 500µm MIN-BIN-Configuration: • Drop numberdensity distribution: dN/d(log D), assumingsphericalform (D: equiv. diameter) • Iceparticlenumberdensity distribution: • Needsat least 2 informations, • instead of justdiameter! • Whichparametersto select? • 2 dimensions (largest, smallest?) • Mass + density? • Volume + surface? Currently: just one parameterused (e.g. dimension or mass); otherparameters are prescribed

  6. Bin icemicrophysicsmodels: • Radius coordiante: Hall (1980): 18 categoriesicecrystals, 10 for transistion, 23 for graupel, 2D Farleyand Orville (1986): hail Respondek et al (1995): icecrystals, graupel, 2D Khvorostyanov, Sassen (1998): icecrystals, mass equ. radius, 2D/3D • Mass coordinates: Reisin et al (1996): icecrystals, graupel, snow, 2D Ovtchinnokov, Kogan (2000): smallest15 categoriesare icecrystalswhile the largest 13 categoriesare graupel, 3D Flossmann, Wobrock (2010): sphericaliceparticles, 3D Khain et al (2011): icecrystals (plate-, columnar- and branch types), aggregates, graupel and hail, 2D

  7. Processes: • Nucleation: The onset temperatures and relative humidities for deposition/condensation freezing and immersion freezing for bioaerosols, solid ammonium sulphate and BC (soot) Adapted from Hoose and Möhler (2012). Whichparticlesformice (chemical composition, size) underwhichatmospherical conditions (temperature, humidity)?

  8. Processes: • Vapourdeposition: Mass growth as a funtion of the capacitance C of a correspondingconductor (information on form: spherical, disk, spheroid,..)

  9. Processes: • Sedimentation: Terminal velocity as a funtion of the selectedparameters ?

  10. Processes: • Riming and aggregation: Collection efficiencies as a funtion of the selectedparameters ?

  11. Processes: • Melting:

  12. gouttes cristaux Processes: • Radiation: Optical parameters as a funtion of the selected size and formparameters ?

  13. Conclusion: • Modelling of the ice phase in cloudsistrappedbetween: • Not enough information and • Toomuch information • What are the mostadaptedparameters and how do all processes relate to these (2?) parameters?

More Related