1 / 12

Consumer: Aggregation

Prerequisites. Almost essential Firm Optimisation Consumption Basics. Consumer: Aggregation. MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell . Use of consumer models is often simplified….

valora
Télécharger la présentation

Consumer: Aggregation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Prerequisites Almost essential Firm Optimisation Consumption Basics Consumer: Aggregation MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell

  2. Use of consumer models is often simplified… • (1) We usually suppose that a many-dimensioned commodity space can be represented appropriately in terms of just a few commodities • Requires aggregation over goods • (2) We often assume that there is a “representative consumer” • Requires aggregation over consumers • We can use economic analysis to see whether and when these two simplifications are appropriate

  3. Aggregation over goods: the issue • Why n goods? • What determines the boundaries between goods? • Diagrams all with 2 goods • Is this valid? • What assumptions are we making? • Is it legitimate to simplify the n-commodity problem to, say, a 2-commodity problem?

  4. Aggregation over goods: the model • Use the standard preference model with ngoods • Find an aggregate `xand a function`U(x1,`x ) that yield the same behaviour as U(x1, x2,x3,…, xn) • Then we can say that `U(•,•) also exactly represents the consumer’s preferences • The aggregation problem is then solved

  5. Aggregation over goods: result • The “composite commodity” theorem: • You can always aggregate over goods 2,3,…,n if relative prices of goods 2,3,…,n stay constant • U(•, •, …,•) and`U(•,•) then represent the same preferences • Clearly this can be done for any arbitrary group of commodities • You just need the condition on relative prices

  6. Aggregation over consumers • We need to model the behaviour of nhconsumers • Consumer h has utility function Uh and income yh • From this get demand for good i in usual way, given prices p: • Dhi(p, yh) • If all goods are “private” we can easily get total demand for i • Just add up over the Dhi • Let’s look at the simple mechanics Alf and Bill

  7. b a x1 x1 Aggregation of consumer demand • Alf’s demand curve for good 1 • Bill’s demand curve for good 1 • Pick any price • Sum of consumers’ demand • Repeat to get the market demand curve p1 p1 p1 x1 Alf Bill The Market

  8. Aggregation over consumers: the issues • Demand for good iby each consumer h depends on prices p and income yh • Aggregation problems could arise as with firms • But main issue is: will the mass of consumers behave in the same way as a single consumer? • In general market demand will depend on the distribution of incomes yh • Can we write average demand as`Di(p,`y), say? • For example`y could be average income in the market • Just take the mean over the consumers • We can do this only in special cases… Graphical illustration

  9. A consumer (Alf) • Preferences look like this x2 • Initial prices determine budget constraint • Prices then change thus • Equilibrium moves from A to A' • A • A' x1

  10. Another consumer (Bill) x2 • Different preferences and resources • But faces the same initial prices • Prices change, just as for Alf • Equilibrium moves from B to B' • B • B' x1

  11. Alf and Bill combined x2 • Initial equilibrium • New equilibrium • In the aggregate WARP does not hold (!) • Each consumer’s behaviour is conventional • Each individual satisfies WARP • But the joint behaviour does not satisfy WARP • This is because Alf and Bill are “too dissimilar” in their preferences A&B • • A'&B' x1

  12. What next? • Integrate production and consumption decisions • Examine behaviour in general equilibrium

More Related