1 / 5

PLANNING SERVICE REVIEW

PLANNING SERVICE REVIEW. CONTEXT & INTRODUCTION A root and branch review No specific written brief from the Executive No resource/funding targets Expectations from Forum members The Forums Planning review sub group. KEY CONTEXTUAL ISSUES. Scale/geog coverage/area offices

vangie
Télécharger la présentation

PLANNING SERVICE REVIEW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PLANNING SERVICE REVIEW CONTEXT & INTRODUCTION A root and branch review No specific written brief from the Executive No resource/funding targets Expectations from Forum members The Forums Planning review sub group

  2. KEY CONTEXTUAL ISSUES • Scale/geog coverage/area offices • National policies/imperatives & pace of change • From 1993-2007 no professionally qualified Hd. of Planning • The growth & aspirations of Bradford • Financial resources-ext & int funding of the service • Staff resources-numbers/skills-training/morale • Balancing major & minor devts; policy prep; urban design and planning agreements.

  3. THE FORUM/ SUB GROUP ROLE FOR THE FUTURE • Not overly involved in Dept structure/back of house systems • Seeking/encouraging greatly improved officer negotiations • Working to facilitate closer engagement with & understanding of members • Suggesting & supporting improved delivery mechanisms • Responsive to emerging policy changes • Joint working on regen/master plans/urban design

  4. SHORT TERM IMPROVEMENTS • Support major applications team with delivery agreement for each project • Abandon/play down ‘call-centre’ approach • Pre-application devt. team approach • Direct case officer contact/negotiations • Introduce written case record- all applics. • Scheme presentation to committees • Engage in member training/understanding • Assist with officer CPD/be encouraging &understanding

  5. SUMMARY & OVERVIEW- • Overall aim- to achieve an enhancement of delivery & quality of outputs via closer engagement. • The four ‘ C’s’ of the engagement process:- Culture change Consistency Cash Councillors

More Related