1 / 20

Econ 100 Lecture 7-1

Econ 100 Lecture 7-1. Market Failure: Oligopolies 2-17-09. This Week. Test will cover Perfect Competition (Ch. 8) Monopoly (Ch. 8 & 9) Oligopoly (Ch. 9) Regulation (Ch. 10) Test is on Tuesday 2/24. Cartels. A cartel is a formal (explicit) agreement among firms.

vanmeters
Télécharger la présentation

Econ 100 Lecture 7-1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Econ 100Lecture 7-1 Market Failure: Oligopolies 2-17-09

  2. This Week • Test will cover • Perfect Competition (Ch. 8) • Monopoly (Ch. 8 & 9) • Oligopoly (Ch. 9) • Regulation (Ch. 10) • Test is on Tuesday 2/24

  3. Cartels • A cartel is a formal (explicit) agreement among firms. • usually occur in an oligopolistic industry, where there are a small number of sellers • usually involve homogeneous products. • Cartel members may agree on such matters • as price fixing, • total industry output, • market shares, • allocation of customers, • allocation of territories • aim of such collusion is to increase individual member's profits by reducing competition. • Competition laws forbid cartels. • Several economic studies and legal decisions of antitrust authorities have found that the median price increase achieved by cartels in the last 200 years is around 25%. • Private international cartels (those with participants from two or more nations) had an average price increase of 28%, whereas domestic cartels averaged 18%. Less than 10% of all cartels in the sample failed to raise market prices

  4. Oligopoly Behavior • Cooperative Oligopoly • Cartels • Agree to collude; act/price like a single firm monoploist • Price leadership (Stackleberg leader) • Dominant firm establishes the price; other firms react to “leader” • Non-cooperative Oligopolies • Sticky prices (kinked demand curve) • Sticky upward • Nash equilibrium • Characterized by stable prices • Perfect competition • Completely rivalarous

  5. Cartel Pricing Tactic • Reduce Qs to monopoly levels in order to: • a) obtain a higher price • b) earn monopoly rents

  6. How do Cartels Operate? • Firms in the cartel need to agree on: • 1) Market price • 2) Quantity supplied by the Industry • 3) Each firm’s “quota” • 4) “Not to cheat” on either price or quantity supplied

  7. How Does the Cartel Do It? • Determining output for the CARTEL • Monopoly-like • Choose either output or price for the cartel at the single-firm monopolist level, either: • Pmonopoly > Pcompetitive OR • Qmonopoly < Q competitive • Allocating Output Among Members • Choose output levels for each member such that marginal costs of production are equal • mc1 = mc2 = … = mcn (for all firms in the cartel) • Price for each member has been set previously for all at Pm

  8. Figure 12.4 Duopoly Equilibrium in a Centralized Cartel Marg Cost at Profit Max Each member’s quota set at MC for Cartel

  9. Conditions for cartel success • the cartel can significantly raise price • Inelastic demand • cartel controls market • Few good substitutes outside the cartel • low organizational costs • few firms (or a few large ones) • industry association • many small buyers: no monopsony power • cartel can be maintained • cheating can be detected and prevented • low expectation of severe government punishment

  10. An Example of a Cartel • Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is an international cartel made up of Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela. • Principal aim of the organization, according to its Statute, is the determination of the best means for safeguarding their interests, individually and collectively; devising ways and means of ensuring the stabilization of prices in international oil markets with a view to eliminating harmful and unnecessary fluctuations • OPEC triggered high inflation across both the developing and developed world using oil embargoes in the 1973 oil crisis. • OPEC's ability to control the price of oil has diminished due to the subsequent discovery/development of large oil reserves in the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea, the opening up of Russia, and market modernization. • OPEC nations still account for two-thirds of the world's oil reserves, and, in 2005, 41.7% of the world's oil production,

  11. Perfect Competition Monopoly Oligopoly • Oligopoly markets are more concentrated than monopolistically competitive markets, but less concentrated than monopolies. Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly

  12. Strategic Behavior • Perfect Competition • Only strategy is to reduce costs • Price-taker => output decisions do not affect market price • cross-price elasticity = -1 (perfect substitutes) • Own-price = -∞ • Monopoly • Price-Searcher: output decision determines price • Cross-price = 0 (no substitutes) • Own-price: >= |1| {at profit maximizing output/price} • Oligopoly • Cross-price elasticity near -1 {for members within the cartel} • Cross-price elasticity near 0 for non-members (no switching) • Own-price elasticity > |1| {for cartel at profit-max price} • Will have to take into account actions of other similar firms when making output/pricing decisions unless they can create an effective cartel • Much more strategy

  13. Firms “cheat” • luckily for consumers, cartels often fail because each firm in a cartel has an incentive to cheat on the cartel agreement • cheating firm • produces extra output or lowers its price • ignores the negative effect of its extra output on other firms’ profits

  14. Factors that work against a Cartel- in the long run • Each firm has an incentive to cheat • Price that firm receives is still above MC of production • Could earn additional profits by slightly expanding output • However, when all firms do this • -> back at competitive market outcome • Qs up to point where MV=MC • See “prisoners dilemma”

  15. What market conditions make Cartels more likely? • Market demand is inelastic • higher prices lead to increase revenues for the cartel • Homogenous goods • easier to initially set/enforce cartel price • Small number of firms/high concentration of market share (easier to monitor, collude) • Fringe players could defeat cartel • More equal shares -> increase incentive to cheat

  16. Price-leadership • Stackelberg price leadership model • Not explicitly collusive • Requires a dominant firm (large market share and some market power) • Firms are allowed to change prices within a certain range • If firm(s) lower price(s) below the “allowed” range, then dominant firm retaliates with lower price and takes away market share • Example: AT&T in the LD market after “Divestiture”

  17. Non-Cooperative Cartels • Some degree of price competition • Firms engage in highly competitive pricing • Similar outcome as perfect competition • Firms have some market power • Resembles monopolistic competition • Stable prices prevail • Non-collusive • Firms choose not to compete because of kinked demand curve

  18. Kinked-Demand Curve • Above the kink, demand is relatively elastic because all other firm’s prices remain unchanged. Below the kink, demand is relatively inelastic because all other firms will introduce a similar price cut, eventually leading to a price war. Therefore, the best option for the oligopolist is to produce at point E which is the equilibrium point

  19. Nash Equilibrium • If firm facing kinked demand curve tries to raise price: • Other firms do not • As demand is highly elastic and other firms are “close” substitutes • Loses market share and revenues • If firm lowers price • Competitors match price decreases

  20. Nash Equilibrium • As a consequence • Best strategy is to neither raise or lower prices; but to maintain “stable” prices • Nash equilibrium in an oligopolist market will be characterized by long-term stable prices or “sticky” prices • Non-price competition • Advertising to create brand name awareness/loyalty • Product proliferation

More Related