1 / 23

The Reversed Field Pinch: on the path to fusion energy

The Reversed Field Pinch: on the path to fusion energy. S.C. Prager September, 2006 FPA Symposium. Why RFP research?. RFP as a fusion configuration For fusion energy science

varian
Télécharger la présentation

The Reversed Field Pinch: on the path to fusion energy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Reversed Field Pinch:on the path to fusion energy S.C. Prager September, 2006 FPA Symposium

  2. Why RFP research? • RFP as a fusion configuration • For fusion energy science (magnetic transport, resistive wall instabilities, electrostatic transport with strong shear, high beta instabilities, fast particle instabilities…..) • For connections to plasma physics and astrophysics (benefits from hot, well-diagnosed fusion plasma)

  3. Why the RFP as a fusion configuration? Toroidal confinement in the limit BT 0 at the plasma surface

  4. Why the RFP as a fusion configuration?

  5. low magnetic field  High beta Very high engineering beta (low field at coils) Normal coils, reduced shielding High mass power density (compact) Efficient maintenance/disassembly Possibly free choice of aspect ratio

  6. RFP Physics Challenges for Fusion • Confinement • Beta limits • Resistive wall instabilities • Current sustainment

  7. RFP Physics Challenges for Fusion • Confinement at q < 1, large transport from magnetic fluctuations; the historic RFP obstacle • Beta limits • intrinsically high; limit not yet known • Resistive wall instabilities • multiple modes unstable without a conducting shell • Current sustainment • bootstrap current small • (except possibly at low aspect ratio)

  8. Confinement Status: Confinement improved by j(r) control Electron energy increases Energy confinement improves ten-fold Tokamak-like electron confinement But, so far demonstrated only transiently Recent advances: Ion energy and confinement increases large orbit ions very well-confined quasi-single helicity states obtained

  9. Electron confinement improved 1.5 MST improved Te (keV) 1 0.5 standard Energy confinement increases tenfold

  10. Ion energy increase • Ions heated by reconnection event (“self-heating”) • Ion energy retained by initiating improved confinement immediately following event

  11. Ti (eV) Ion heating in standard plasma reconnectionevent Ti (eV) Ion heating with improved confinement Improved confinement

  12. Ions hotter over entire plasma Ti (eV) MST r/a

  13. Confinement Status: Confinement improvement by j(r) control Electron energy increases Energy confinement improves ten-fold Tokamak-like electron confinement, with low BT But, so far demonstrated only transiently Recent advances: Ion energy and confinement increases large orbit ions very well-confined quasi-single-helicity states obtained

  14. From neutral beam injection Confinement of fast ions Fast ion confinement time > 20 ms ion trajectory radius toroidal angle

  15. Confinement Status: Confinement improvement by j(r) control Electron energy increases Energy confinement improves ten-fold Tokamak-like electron confinement, with low BT But, so far demonstrated only transiently Recent advances: Ion energy and confinement increases large orbit ions very well-confined quasi-single-helicity states obtained

  16. Beta Limits Status Beta historically high, even with poor confinement, High beta also obtained with improved confinement Recent With improved confinement, beta increases with pellet injection

  17. Beta increased, for example, from upper limit not yet known

  18. Resistive Wall Instabilities Recent: All instabilities suppressed by feedback (RFX, Italy; T2, Sweden)

  19. Resistive Wall Instabilities Recet: All instabilities suppressed by feedback (RFX, Italy; T2, Sweden) • Standard • With feedback toroidal mode number Next: optimize for engineering feasibility, additional programming for enhanced control

  20. Current Sustainment • Oscillating field current drive (or ac helicity injection, an oscillating inductive technique, possibly efficient, but possibly degrades confinement) • Bootstrap-current driven at small aspect ratio • Pulsed reactor scenarios

  21. Oscillating field current drive 10% current drive Ohmic efficiency MST Next: increased power, test efficiency and confinement compatibility

  22. Current RFP Program Emphases Europe: Resistive wall instabilities Single helicity states US/Japan: Confinement Beta limits Sustainment

  23. RFP Development • In the past decade, the RFP has developed substantially, with modest (but significant) resources • In the next decade,with reasonably enhanced capabilities, the RFP can be advanced to more fusion-relevant and new physics regimes • If results are positive, the RFP could influence the fusion vision within the time to DEMO

More Related