1 / 21

Sarah Rowland-Jones Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, UK

What can we learn about HIV pathogenesis from different models of natural control of HIV/SIV infection?. Sarah Rowland-Jones Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, UK. Approaches to defining protective immunity against HIV infection. Learn from other successful human vaccines

varick
Télécharger la présentation

Sarah Rowland-Jones Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, UK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What can we learn about HIV pathogenesis from different models of natural control of HIV/SIV infection? Sarah Rowland-Jones Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, UK

  2. Approaches to defining protective immunity against HIV infection • Learn from other successful human vaccines • Develop and test a successful HIV vaccine in humans or SIV vaccine in monkeys • Study individuals with a relatively good outcome from an encounter with HIV/SIV • Exposed seronegatives • Long-term non-progressors/elite controllers with HIV-1 infection • Monkeys with naturally attenuated SIV infection (such as SIVsmm in sooty mangabeys) • Humans with naturally attenuated HIV-2 infection

  3. Delayed disease progression in HIV-1 infection • Natural history of HIV-1 infection without therapy follows a normal distribution, with a median time to AIDS around 10-11 years in most cohorts (regardless of ethnic origin or infecting clade) • Long-term non-progressors (LTNPs) defined as survivors with HIV-1 infection for >7-10 years, no therapy, no symptoms and stable CD4+ T-cell count > 500mm3; represent around < 1-5 % of cohorts • “Elite controllers” defined as HIV-1 infected individuals with plasma VL <50 copies/ml for over one year without ART: represent 0.35-0.8% of most cohorts • “Viraemic controllers”: as above but with pVL <2000 copies/ml • Some but not complete overlap: controllers may progress to AIDS even whilst maintaining low viral load, LTNPs may have high viral load: most people in both groups eventually develop disease • US Department of Defense Natural History study of >4500 subjects: 0.55% were elite controllers, who maintained viraemic control for a median of 846 days, significantly better clinical outcome than viraemic controllers (3.34%): 2.04% LTNP(10)s – significantly longer survival than LTNP(7s) (Okulicz, JID 09)

  4. What are the mechanisms of spontaneous viral control in HIV-1 infection? • Mechanisms of viral control are heterogeneous • A minority are infected with attenuated virus, with mutations in nef/LTR (e.g the Sydney Blood Bank cohort) (Deacon, Science 95) • Elite controllers have lower pro-viral load and virus is difficult to culture, although activated cells are susceptible to exogenous HIV infection (Julg, CID 10) • Strong HLA class I associations, especially HLA-B27 (~20% controllers), HLA-B*5701/B*5703 (~50% of controllers), HLA-B51: also -35 mutation in HLA-C promoter, associated with increased HLA C expression (Carrington, Science 99, Fellay, Science 07, Carrington NG 09) • Additional protective effect from KIR3DS1 in association with Bw4 HLA types (Martin, Nat. Gen. 02, 06) • Other host genetic polymorphisms (e.g. CCR5-D32, CCR2-64I) with more modest impact on progression

  5. Features of the HIV-1-specific immune response associated with viral control • Immune activation lower in LTNPs than progressors but higher than HIV- controls (Hunt, JID 08) • LTNPs don’t have stronger or broader CTL responses than progressors and tend to have low nAb titres • Tend to have preserved HIV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses (including IL-2 secretion) (Rosenberg, Science 97, Boaz, JI 02) • Presence of CTL responses to 3 or more epitopes in gag correlates with lower viral load(Kiepiela, NM 07) • Noprotective T-cell epitopes identified • How do the beneficial HLA types confer protection? Not clear, possibly through selection of escape variants with a significant fitness cost (Martinez-Picardo, JVI, 06, Miura, JVI 09) or through generation of CTL with enhanced cytolytic ability (Migueles, Immunity 08)

  6. Features of the HIV-specific CTL response associated with viral control: II • CTL from LTNPs more likely to be polyfunctional and produce MIP-1b(Betts, Blood, 06) • Progressors more likely to have CTL expressing markers of senescence (CD57) or exhaustion (PD-1) (Brenchley, Blood 02, Day, Nature 07) • HIV-specific CTL from LTNPs more likely to be able to proliferate and show higher levels of Perforin (Migueles NI 02)(Hersperger, PLoSP 10) and Granzyme B (Migueles, Immunity 08) • CTL from LTNPs likely to be of high avidity (Almeida, JEM 07, Blood 09) • Certain T-cell receptors may convey an advantage: e.g. with the ability to contain escape mutation (Dong JEM 04) or with unusually high avidity • Selection of CTL escape mutations in elite controllers suggests ongoing viral replication and evolution (Miura, JVI 09)

  7. SIV in natural hosts: the sooty mangabey model • Natural hosts of SIV include the African green monkey and the sooty mangabey (from West Africa) • SIVsmm has entered humans on several occasions, forming different clades of HIV-2, and has also given rise to SIV mac strains • Most SIVsm infected monkeys have a normal lifespan with no signs of disease • Occasionally develop low CD4 count, but not associated with clinical immunodeficiency • Kinetics of viral replication similar to that of pathogenic SIV/HIV • Primary infection associated with CD4+ depletion in GALT, similar to that seen in pathogenic SIV • Persistently high viral loads (104 – 106/ml), with low immune activation, normal T-cell turnover and weak immune responses (both T-cell and ab) (Paiardini, 09)

  8. CD4 CD8 B cell The Battle of the Immune system in HIV-1 infection CD4 T cell exhaustion Functional CD4 T cell help & regulation Proliferation < Apoptosis CD4 and CD8 T cell exhaustion CD8 T cells HLA type-dependent VL driven Superinfections Loss of Tregs Neutralizing Ab Rise in immune activation Rise in VL Viremia control Viral Escape Loss of CD8 T cells Loss of neutralizing Abs

  9. Causes of immune activation in HIV/SIV infection • HIV antigenic stimulation • HIV gene products • Env: gp120 binds CD4/co-receptors, leading to activation • Nef: triggers transcription (97% identical to αCD3 T cell activation) • Nef in SIVs • Downregulation of CD3-TcR  protection from immune activation (BUT – SIV mac) • Ability to downregulate CD3-TcR is lost in HIV-1 Nef (retained in HIV-2) • Low Treg levels • In SIVagm-infected AGMs: high Tregs • Increased TGFβ, IL-10  attenuated immune activation • Co-infection, including CMV infection • As CD4 T cell levels decline, latent viruses are reactivated • Mucosal barrier integrity/CCR5+ CD4 T cell depletion • Microbes translocate across the disrupted GI wall as CD4 T cells are depleted • LPS activates innate immune system via TLR signaling on macrophages/DCs • Proinflammatory state established • Induction of innate immune systemleading to functional impairment of T cells • Suppressive effect of type I interferon produced by pDC

  10. Immune activation increases with disease progression in HIV-1 infection Grossman et al, Nature Medicine 12, 289 - 295 (2006)

  11. Immune activation is low in SIV-infected natural host monkeys Paiardini et al, Ann. Rev. Med. 09

  12. HIV-2:a naturally attenuated human retrovirus infection? • 1983 – HIV-1 isolated • Evolved from SIVcpz • Group M cross-species transmission: • ~1930 +/- 15 years • 1986 – HIV-2 isolated • Evolved from SIVsm • Endemic amongst sooty mangabeys (Tau forest, Cote d’Ivoire) • Each subtype represents a distinct cross-species transmission: • Probably 8 separate entries into humans • ~1940 +/- 16 years (Lemey, PNAS 03) • Guinea Bissau suggested as epicentre of HIV-2 epidemic in West Africa • Rapid spread began in 1960-70 • Coincides with war of independence (1963-74) • Epidemiological linkage with Portugal • First HIV-2 cases in Europe recorded in Portuguese war veterans • Lisbon has the largest number of HIV-2 cases in Europe • HIV-2 found in Angola, Mozambique, Goa • Also reported in India, Brazil, S. Korea, Japan

  13. Why study HIV-2 infection? • ~1 million people infected in West Africa • 15-20% HIV-2-infected people develop AIDS and could benefit from ART, but effective viral suppression with ART is much harder to achieve than for HIV-1 - intrinsic resistance to NNRTIs, fusion inhibitors and some protease inhibitors • Does HIV-2 protect against HIV-1 infection? (Travers, Science 1995): protection not found in three other studies - probably a risk factor in Caio (Schim van der Loeff, AIDS 2001) • Majority of infected people have a normal lifespan and show no signs of immunodeficiency - natural human model of attenuated HIV infection • Progressors (15-20%) clinically indistinguishable from people with HIV-1 • Responses to HIV-2 in non-progressors resemble those currently desired from an HIV-1 vaccine

  14. How does the natural history of HIV-2 infection differ from HIV-1? • Proviral load at different disease stages is similar to HIV-1, but plasma viral load is much lower (Berry, 1998, Popper, 2000) • Disease progression is predicted by plasma VL (Whittle, 1992, Berry 2003) and serum 2m (Jaffar, 2005) but NOT by CD4 count/% (Jaffar, 2010) • Rates of progression similar between HIV-1 and HIV-2 for a given plasma VL (Gottlieb, 2002) (Hansmann, 2005) • Progression to AIDS occurs in a minority, estimated at 20% in the Caio cohort (Jaffar, 2010) • Clinical features are indistinguishable from AIDS caused by HIV-1 (Martinez-Steele, 2006) • Age is NOT a risk factor for disease progression • Life expectancy of older people (55-80 yrs) with HIV-2 same as uninfected population (Poulsen, 1997) • Thus HIV-2 does not have a generally attenuated phenotype, but leads to a very high proportion of LTNPs

  15. Survival with HIV-2 infection in the Caio cohort • Follow up of 133 HIV-2-infected subjects and 158 HIV uninfected controls in Caio between 1991 and 2006 (S. Jaffar et al, Retrovirology 2010) • Overall mortality rate per 100 person years was 4.6 for the HIV-2+ subjects and 2.2 for the controls • For subjects over 60 years old, survival is unaffected by HIV-2 status • Survival shows strong inverse correlation with plasma viral load, no independent relationship with %CD4 cells • Plasma viral load was stable in the non-progressors for over a decade

  16. Systemic immune activation is a feature of HIV-2 infection and is directly related to viral load HLA-DR CD38 CD4/CD8 HLA-DR/CD38 expression HIV-2 patients: N=107 Leligdowicz et al, JID, 2010

  17. Strong immune responses are associated with HIV-2 control • HIV-2 infection is not generally attenuated but yields a high proportion of LTNPs, whereas progressors develop AIDS in a similar way to people with HIV-1 infection • “Non-progression” is associated with good quality CD4+ T-cell help (Duvall, JI 06, EJI 08), high magnitude, polyfunctional CD8+ T-cell responses (Leligdowicz, JCI 07), and preserved innate responses (Nuvor, JVI 06) • Control of viral load is strongly associated with T-cell responses to a single highly conserved region (MHR) in the capsid protein (Leligdowicz, JCI 07) • T-cells responding to this region are of unusually high avidity with restricted T-cell receptor usage, and do not select escape variants (Leligdowicz, EJI 10) • Is this the kind of immune response we need from an HIV-1 vaccine?

  18. HIV-2 gag contains a “protective” T-cell epitope Peptide 46 - MHR region of gag p26 Target for CD4+ responses, HLA-DR*1302-restricted Also target for CD8+ responses, including B14 and B40-restricted 20 Patients with Peptide 046-specific responses have a lower VL than those who do not(p=0.05) Leligdowicz et al, JCI, 2007

  19. Characteristics of T-cell responses to the “protective” HIV-2 peptide p46 • T-cells target the Major Homology Region (MHR) • 20- region in capsid domain of Gag • Plays a critical role in particle assembly • Immunogenic: contains several T-cell epitopes in HIV-1 • Highly conserved among most retroviruses • Good potential for resistance to escape mutation • T-cells targeting this region show: • Unusually high avidity (several log orders greater than for most virus-specific T-cells) • Oligoclonal TCR usage (selection of Vb17) • Early differentiation phenotype: proliferate well, not “exhausted” (despite long infection history) • Don’t select viral escape variants (Leligdowicz, EJI 10)

  20. Comparison of HIV-1/HIV-2/SIVsmm models of viral control • SIVsmm: Stable phenotype, 100% animals • high viral loads • Weak immune responses • Low/absent immune activation • HIV-1 elite control: Very rare: Stable phenotype?? • Low viral load/viral replication • Moderate immune responses, high quality gag-specific CTL, select escape mutations • Low but detectable immune activation • HIV-2 elite control: Stable phenotype in ~80% subjects • Low viral load/viral replication • Very strong immune responses, high quality, high avidity gag peptide-specific CTL, no viral escape • Low but detectable immune activation

  21. ~ Thank you ~

More Related