1 / 93

MEDICAL LITIGATION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY PRACTICE

MEDICAL LITIGATION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY PRACTICE. Dr AO Oladele Dr IT Akinola Dr OO Saanu Barrister V Ilori Dr IO Morhason-Bello. Outline. Case presentation Introduction/definition Definition of Key Concepts Potential sources of medical litigation

vashon
Télécharger la présentation

MEDICAL LITIGATION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY PRACTICE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MEDICAL LITIGATION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY PRACTICE Dr AO Oladele Dr IT Akinola Dr OO Saanu Barrister V Ilori Dr IO Morhason-Bello

  2. Outline • Case presentation • Introduction/definition • Definition of Key Concepts • Potential sources of medical litigation • Some examples of Medico-legal Cases in OBGYN • Effects of medical litigation • Reducing cases of litigation • Conclusion • Recommendation

  3. Case Summary (Marc & Novak , 2001) • Mrs. X was scheduled for induction of labour on 27/09/2001 on account of postdatism • At 7am • Pitocin induction was commenced • On epidural analgesia • FHR tracing at presentation was normal • FHR tracing later revealed signs of distress with hyperstimulation with no intervention

  4. Case Summary………………… • 1.45pm • Second stage of labour • She pushed for 30 minutes but could not bear down effectively due to the level of anesthesia. • 2.15pm • Her epidural anesthetic was turned down • 3.00pm • Resumed bearing down • She was directed to push for almost 4 hours until she was exhausted.

  5. Case Summary……………….. • The attending physician was in and out of the labour and delivery room all day attending to other affairs – • Seeing other patients at her office, • Going to the clinic • Left the hospital again at 5:00pm to see patients at her office when her presence was needed. • Labour was left in the care of the midwives

  6. Case Summary……………………. • 6.40pm • The doctor returned to the hospital and performed the low forceps delivery • 7.01pm • The baby delivered with severe birth asphyxia • The baby suffered Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) and diagnosed with Cerebral Palsy of the spastic quadriplegic type

  7. Case Summary …………………….. • Errors Identified • Failure to identify and respond to fetal intolerance to labour shown on the fetal heart tracing • Failure to improve the baby's oxygenation • Failure to perform fetal scalp pH sampling to diagnose acidosis • Failure to invoke the chain of command to effect timely delivery

  8. Case Summary …………………….. • Errors Identified • The baby presented with an absolutely perfect fetal heart tracing and it deteriorated without the necessary and appropriate intervention that would have prevented this tragic outcome.

  9. Case Summary …………………….. • The Settlement • After four years of litigation • The parent were compensated with $18,000,000.00 • Equivalent to ₦3,096,000,000( at ₦172 to a dollar) • The proceeds of this settlement were deposited into a special trust account for the benefit of the child

  10. Introduction • It is the expectations of patients that medical practitioners are properly trained in their fields of endeavour • They see them as solution providers for all kinds of health problems and thus put their trust and confidence in them • Despite these expectations, medical professionals sometimes make mistakes because of poor judgment, inexcusable negligence, lack of immediate care, malpractice or focus on wrong ailment (LauretteIberiyenari, 2013)

  11. Introduction • With the increasing rates of negligence, patients are beginning to seek redress and are being enlightened by legal practitioners • Health care practitioners are thus confronted with the problem & risk of being sued • This is believed to have influence various aspects of gynaecological & obstetrical practice(Schifrin & Cohen 2013)

  12. Introduction • The four common clinical causes of medical litigation in obstetrics and gynaecology are (Mavroforou et al 2005): • Cases involving fetal distress • Uterine rupture after a vaginal birth in a woman with previous C-section • Shoulder dystocia • Misdiagnosis of cancer • Ligation raised from most of the cases is driven by bad outcomes not by malpractice

  13. Definitions • Medical litigation is a process of carrying out a lawsuit or civil action as opposed to criminal proceedings (Studdert et al 2005) • Medical malpractice or negligence is defined as the failure or deviation from medical professional duty of care • It is a failure to exercise an accepted standard of care in medical professional skills or knowledge, resulting in injury, damage or loss (Studdert et al 2005)

  14. Definitions… • Defensive medicine is defined as medical actions, performed mainly in order to refrain from being sued, rather than actually aiding the patient • Some health care practitioner claim that it is a legitimate phenomenon, while others consider it immoral (Asher et al. 2013) • Defensive medicine brings with it exponential increases in the costs associated with clinical practice

  15. Definitions….. • Litigants are persons (parties) involved in a lawsuit • Plaintiff refers to the person who initiates the lawsuit. It can be the patient, relatives or state • Defendants refers to the person sued in a civil action (or person accused of a crime). • It can be the health care practitioner or institution

  16. Origin of Medical Litigation • The earliest medical malpractice case was Stratton V. Swanlond decided in 1374(Chapman, 1992) • The defendant (surgeon) attempted to repair plaintiff's traumatically mangled hand • The plaintiff claimed that the surgeon guaranteed to cure her injury for a reasonable fee, but after the treatment her hand remained severely deformed

  17. Origin of Medical Litigation… • The lawsuit was dismissed because of procedural error in the Writ of Complaint • However, the judge set forth principles to follow in future cases which are recognized today • “He stated that a physician should be liable when a patient is injured as a result of negligence, however if the physician exercised all due care, he would not be liable even if he did not obtain consent”

  18. Medical Ethics and The Law • Medical law is the aspect of the law which governs the relationship between the healthcare provider and patient • The medical practitioner is bound by certain laws depending on the circumstances of his practice • Law and ethics may overlap since obtaining patient permission is both legally required and the “right thing to do”(Johnson, 2001) • Good process should help create trust, rapport and alliance by showing respect for the patient

  19. Rights of The Patients • A patient has a right to know the clinic/hospital rules, regulations and charges before getting treated/admitted • A patient has absolute right to privacy, consultation, physical examination, case discussion, procedures and the right to have his treatment kept confidential • He has a right to ask any person who is not directly involved in his treatment, examination, e.t.c not to be present

  20. Rights of The Patients…. • She has a right to know about the nature of his illness, and reports of investigations • It is the patient’s right to know: • Necessity of treatment • Alternative modes of treatment • Risk of pursuing the treatment/undergoing a surgery including their inherent risks and complications • Probable duration of treatment; • Prognosis of illness in the language he can understand

  21. Rights of The Patients…. • It is equally a patient’s right to seek consultation from another doctor/specialist • It is her right as a patient to refuse further medical care. She can leave against medical advice, to the extent that it does not contravene any law. • In case she decides to quit treatment against medical advice, he has a right to obtain details of investigations and treatment undergone

  22. Duties of Medical Doctors In Nigeria • The laws and various Codes of Medical Ethics and Declarations have been enacted to regulate medical practice in Nigeria. Among these laws are: 1. Medical and Dental Practitioners Act, Cap LFN 2004 2. Hippocratic Oath 3. Declaration of Geneva 4. Declaration of Helsinki 5. International Code of Medical Ethics

  23. Duties to Patients • A medical doctor owes the following duties to the patients: • Standard of care • Providing information to the patient regarding-necessity of treatment • Emergency care • Consent for treatment

  24. Professional Ethics Duties • This is another very important duty of a medical practitioner and these can also be summarized as follows:- • A doctor has a duty not to refuse professional service on grounds of religion, nationality, race, politics or social status • Duty not to associate with unregistered medical practitioner and not to allow him to practice what he is not qualified for • Duty not to indulge in self-advertisement, except such as is expressly authorized by law

  25. Professional Ethics Duties • Duty not to issue false certificates and bills • Duty not to attend to patient when under the effect of alcohol • Information given by patient to be kept secret • A medical doctor should not talk carelessly about his colleagues (Medical and Dental Practitioners Act, Cap LFN 2004)

  26. Informed Consent • Informed consent is a process of information exchange • A competent (understands nature/consequences of actions) un-coerced patient who understands the procedure, its risks, benefits and alternatives then makes a free informed choice • It is a dialogue in which both parties participate actively(Anderson & Wearne, 2007)

  27. The Elements of Consent • These includes the following: • Nature of the procedure • Its risks and possible benefits • Alternatives to the procedure • Competent patient, engaged professional • No coercion or duress • A full discussion and documentation

  28. Some Exceptions to Consent • Emergency • Unforeseen developments in surgical procedure • (No need to wake patient up for permission if immediate medically necessary action is required) • Newborn Screening

  29. Documenting The Decision • It is noteworthy to remember that the process of arriving at a decision is a conversation • Once a decision is made it is documented on an “Informed Consent” form • The form is the outcome and not a substitute for the process of information exchange

  30. Consent-do We Need It? • Consent does the following: • Allows clarity for who decides. (e.g. specific rights for minors) • Allows clarity for what decisions can be made (e.g. end of life) • Shows respect and helps build a sound provider-patient relationship

  31. UCH Consent Form

  32. Consent Form for Hysterectomy

  33. Consent Form For Ectopic Pregnancy

  34. Consent Form for Caeserean Section

  35. Informed Refusal • Patient is told the indicated procedure, its risks, benefits and alternatives and patient refuses. • If injury occurs can patient claim malpractice? • Example: Patient refuses ultrasound then has a life threatening bleed from an undiagnosed placenta previa. • Why refusal? Belief that ultrasound causes autism

  36. Disagreement between Provider and Client • Must all patient choices be honored? • What if the choice violates the health care practitioner’s beliefs (abortion, unconventional therapy) or professional rules (illegal drugs) • Resolution: Parting of the ways in extreme cases but must counsel and be sure patient will not be abandoned

  37. Avoid Abandonment during disagreement period • Tell patient what the disagreement is and what options you are willing to provide. No guilt or blaming • If patient disagrees then provide a period of time to allow transfer of care • Do not discontinue care if that would result in avoidable injury and document properly

  38. The Limits of Autonomy Sample Case: • 24 yr. old recently married patient wants an abortion for a 6 week pregnancy. Her BP is high (157/99mmHg). A review of her medical records shows 6 months of untreated elevated pressures. • You offer surgical versus medical abortion; Patient refuses surgical • The risks of stroke with medical approach was fully discussed. Patient says she understands then says: “Now can I have the pill?” • Should the provider refuse?

  39. The Limits of Autonomy • Informed choice or physician’s right to refuse? • Can provider’s treatment of a medical condition trump patient’s autonomy? • In the prior refusal of ultrasound with a placenta previa example assume the baby is born damaged • Mother may not have a successful legal claim because an informed refusal was documented. Does baby have an independent claim?

  40. Minors • According to Nigerian Constitution • A person who is under the age of full legal responsibility (< 18 years) • Minors can consent for certain things as allowed by State law • The Basic Rule is Parent/guardian consent • Exceptions • Emancipated minor (married, armed forces, court order), State law, mature minor rule

  41. Incompetent Patients • If adult but never competent due to mental status then guardian decides • If adult but transitorily incompetent (coma) then Durable Power of Attorney (with named Advocate) or Spouse or guardian decides. • (e.g. Sterilization of incompetent adult)

  42. A case study of an Incompetent Patient • Pregnant woman in ICU with eclampsia. It is day 5 and patient is stable and ready for transfer to general unit • Patient refuses transfer because she believes care is better in ICU • How to proceed? Justice issues? Allocation of scarce resources issues?

  43. Another Case Scenario • A competent 24 year old with heavy bleeding requesting hysterectomy • Health care practitioners have not exhausted medical therapy but patient is “fed up” and wants the surgery • Health care practitioner not ready to move to surgery • What happens?

  44. Another Case Scenario • A 26 year old primigravida wants C-Section to preserve her perineum. • No medical indication for C-Section • Professional societies (ACOG and NIH) says patient gets to choose • Provider not sure this is in patient’s best interests

  45. Potential Sources of Medical Litigation • PROVIDER • Lack of awareness of the problems • Culture of silence • Blame and shame mentality • Fatigue

  46. Potential Sources of Medical Litigation • Fatigue • Burnout is a state of emotional, mental, and physical exhaustion caused by excessive and prolonged stress. (Melinda S. et al 2013) • The Working Time Act( ILL 1995) • Eight-hour working day • 40-hour working week

  47. Potential Sources of Medical Litigation • INSTITUTION • System constraints • Staffing problems • Lack of protocols/guidelines • Training and re-training

More Related