1 / 11

SC-214/WG-78 SG-3 Status of INTEROP Standards at Plenary 9

SC-214/WG-78 SG-3 Status of INTEROP Standards at Plenary 9. Plenary #9: 14 – 18 December 2009 Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A. Claudia Chitty - Frédéric Picard . Issues to be addressed Technical Issues Documentation Isssues Validation Process Issues. SC-214 / WG78 Standard Status

vashon
Télécharger la présentation

SC-214/WG-78 SG-3 Status of INTEROP Standards at Plenary 9

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SC-214/WG-78 SG-3Status of INTEROP Standardsat Plenary 9 Plenary #9: 14 – 18 December 2009Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A Claudia Chitty - Frédéric Picard

  2. Issues to be addressed Technical Issues Documentation Isssues Validation Process Issues • SC-214 / WG78 Standard Status • ATN INTEROP Standard • FANS Accommodation Standard • ATN Technical Specifications • SC-214 / WG78 Data Link Profiles

  3. ATS INTEROP (ATN) Current Scope: DLIC+, CPDLC: ACL+, ACM+, AMC+, D-TAXI, DCL ADS-C DOTIS, RVR Backwards compatibility rules with ED110B ATN implementations (LK2+) Current Version V0.16 Aligned with SPR Version G Editors: F. Picard (DLIC,CPDLC/FIS) G. Saccone (ADS-C) Status Review to be completed this week (17 ATN comments) Ready for validation Future Work Completion D-RVR (P10) Inclusion of D-HZWX, ITP and Oceanic Services (2010) Validation Effort CPDLC : medium (validation by « delta » vs. ED110B/DO280B) ADS-C and FIS: high (new) INTEROP LK2+ Backwards Compatibility Specifications: high (new)

  4. FANS1/A+ INTEROP Scope: Accommodation for CM & CPDLC (WP1) Guidance Material for ADS-C (WP2) Current Version WP1_v11 – WP2_v0.3 Aligned with SPR Version G Editor: G. Collings Status 7 comments on DCL Ready for validation Validation Effort CPDLC-based services: low (validation by « delta » vs. ED-154 / DO-306)

  5. SC-214 / WG78 Data Link Profiles(POICS) CPDLC Editor: Bruce Eckeert Current Version: v0.16 Review in progress (1 comment) ADS-C Current version: V0.16 Editor: Fred Picard Airborne part only available 4DTRAD Support only Concern Simplification of POICS proforma for a better use Future Work Ground ADS-C Part FIS not started NEW

  6. ATN Technical Specifications(Doc 9880) CM – ATN A/G Protocol Specification Doc 9880 Edition 1 fully applicable No change require to support SC-214 profile PM-CPDLC – ATN A/G Protocol Specification Doc 9880 Edition 1 fully applicable No change require to support SC-214 profile PM-ADS – ATN A/G Protocol Specification Editor: G. Saccone V0.6 (V0.5 output ICAO) Aligned with Doc 9694 Draft 12 Distribution at Plenary #9 PM-FIS – ATN A/G Protocol Specification V1.4 (V1 output ICAO) Distributed with the April FAA Evaluation Version Status Review in progress (no comments) Ready for validation (PM-ADS & PM-FIS) Required Validation Effort CM & (PM)CPDLC = low (validation/implentation done) (PM)ADS-C & (PM)FIS : medium (ICAO validation in 2006) NEW

  7. Comment Process – StatusATN INTEROP = 25 comments

  8. Technical Issues CPDLC (5) showstopper: Error / enhancement in ASN.1 No LINK backwards compatibility for [route clearance] parameter ACM (2) Document differences between normal and abrupt CPDLC connection termination (End vs. Abort) No latency check on downlink system messages (e.g. DM99 CDA) DCL (8) Inconsistency SPR / IOP Messages in DCL requests (a/c type, prefered level, departure frequency…) ADS-C (7) showstopper: single or multiple RTA ? Emergency status in ADS-C contract reject message ? Level defined twice in ADS-C report Fixname replaced by Waypoint Identifier in ADS-C report « Lateral Type » values, EPP parameter optional/mandatory attributes not consistent with SPR SNOWTAM (1) ASN.1 definition of SNOWTAM report (close) ITP (1) Alignment with ED122 Change 1 proposal PICS (1) Errors detected in CPDLC PICS

  9. Documentation Management Issues • Traceability • SC-214 INTEROP Requirements to ED110B/DO280B IRs • SC-214 FANS Accommodatrion Requirements to ED-154/DO-306 Requirements • Question to Plenary: confirm the need for such traceability. • Document Naming • Names required for SC-214/WG-78 documents (e.g. « PU-40 » before ED-154 publication) • Document Versions • Several version conventions for SPR (letter), INTEROP documents (major/minor release) – Decide on way and document in José’s WP. • Document Configuration Control • Wide distribution of defects and defect resolutions • Need for a formal Configuration Process • Comment matrix is not sufficient • Formal PDR (Proposed Defect Report) • Need for establishing a CCB before validation starts • Need for a dedicated mailing list and/or a PDR data base (e.g. bugzilla)

  10. Validation Process (2010) – S-214 Issues • Need to define a Validation Plan with Validation Objectives covering all documents (SPR, IOP, Tech Specs) • Functional Validation Objectives (VO) • Technical Validation Objectives (TO) • Document/Specification Validation Objecftives (SO) • Need to define Validation means and Validation level • Paper Review • Implementation of Prototypes by 1 or more than 2 independant initiatives • Consolidate a Validation Report • From validation reports sent by validation initiatives • Validation Coverage Analysis • Validation Assessment and Statement

  11. Week output • No separate INTEROP meeting – Common working sessions with the SPR SG. Issues and resolution are the one reported by SPR SG. • 32 new comments have been raised. Editors have clear instructions how to handle these comments. Should be done by January. No showstopper for INTEROP. • The DCL issues for FANS accommodation have been addressed in the DCL session and are closed. • CPDLC PICS are up to date. • Material for CPDLC is now stable. • Work remains to be done is to align the INTEROP doc with the decisions taken this week on ADS-C

More Related