1 / 10

Assessment of Climate Change Policies (An useful tool for decision makers)

Assessment of Climate Change Policies (An useful tool for decision makers). Dr. Popi KONIDARI Head of Climate Change Policy Unit Energy Policy and Development Centre (KEPA). Contents. M/A Policy portfolios development Need for effective portfolios Need for Assessment

vcourtney
Télécharger la présentation

Assessment of Climate Change Policies (An useful tool for decision makers)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessment of Climate Change Policies(An useful tool for decision makers) Dr. Popi KONIDARI Head of Climate Change Policy Unit Energy Policy and Development Centre (KEPA)

  2. Contents • M/A Policy portfolios development • Need for effective portfolios • Need for Assessment • AMS – (A “tailor made” method) • Range of use (assessment) • Results - benefits Myrtos beach, Hellas Ministerial meeting “Climate Change and Green Economy” Belgrade – 23 April 2012

  3. M/A Policy Portfolios Development • Definitions • Mitigation – Adaptation • Data collection • IPCC standards • Scenarios development • BAU - Opt.- Pes. • Model implementation • LEAP • Final results Lake Baikal in Russia Ministerial meeting “Climate Change and Green Economy” Belgrade – 23 April 2012

  4. Needs for effective portfolios • Understandableidentification and optimization of climate policy dynamics • Reliableverification of results and impacts of instruments for GHG emission reductions and development of energy systems • Justifiedselection of the most appropriate instruments for the country Black Sea, Cape Kaliakra coast in Bulgaria Ministerial meeting “Climate Change and Green Economy” Belgrade – 23 April 2012

  5. Need for assessment • Selection of the most appropriate policy instrument/portfolio • Projection of weaknesses • Test of newly designed instruments Red Bridge, Gazakh District, River Khramin Azerbaijan Ministerial meeting “Climate Change and Green Economy” Belgrade – 23 April 2012

  6. AMS – (A “tailor made” tool) • Criteria, sub-criteria • Data and judgments • Numerical results • Friendly software Autumn forest with a river in Ramet gorge,Transylvania inRomania Ministerial meeting “Climate Change and Green Economy” Belgrade – 23 April 2012

  7. Criteria Tree Direct contribution to reduction of GHG emissions Indirect environmental effects Cost effectiveness Dynamic cost efficiency Competitiveness Equity Flexibility Stringency for non-compliance and non-participation Implementation network capacity Administrative feasibility Financial feasibility Environmental performance Mitigation/Adaptation to climate change Political acceptability Feasibility of implementation Ministerial meeting “Climate Change and Green Economy” Belgrade – 23 April 2012

  8. Range of use (assessment) • Policy portfolios • Policy instruments • One instrument in a number of countries • A number of instruments in one country • Interactions Caucasus in Georgia Ministerial meeting “Climate Change and Green Economy” Belgrade – 23 April 2012

  9. Results - benefits • Quantitative assessment • Comparable outcomes • Optimal policy portfolios Lake Sevan in Armenia Ministerial meeting “Climate Change and Green Economy” Belgrade – 23 April 2012

  10. Thank you Contact point Energy Policy and Development Centre Dr. Popi KONIDARI Tel.: 0030 72 75 830 e-mail: pkonidar@kepa.uoa.gr Ministerial meeting “Climate Change and Green Economy” Belgrade – 23 April 2012

More Related