1 / 38

US CMS

US CMS. US CMS Detector Project Overview Dan Green US CMS Project Manager DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001. Outline. Project Status - Financial FY98+99 Closeout, 1 year “rolling” closeout Schedule Changes (V31) Installation -and Commissioning Technical Progress.

vern
Télécharger la présentation

US CMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. US CMS US CMS Detector Project Overview Dan Green US CMS Project Manager DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001

  2. Outline • Project Status - Financial • FY98+99 Closeout, 1 year “rolling” closeout • Schedule Changes (V31) • Installation -and Commissioning • Technical Progress

  3. US CMS - DOE, NSF Profile US CMS balance between DOE and NSF funds is roughly correct. We have modified I&C planning to match the CMS V31 schedule. NSF ends in FY03.

  4. US CMS Detector Project No trends are evident. No “divergence”.

  5. Financial Overview - I • BCWS 84.0 AYM$ • BCWP 74.1 • Obligations 80.6 • Paid Actuals 64.6 • Obligations/BCWS 96 % • BCWP/BCWS 88 % • Paid Actuals/BCWP 87 % We are getting the funds out to groups and we are getting the jobs under contract. There is some lag in schedule/reporting and in invoicing.

  6. % Complete at L2 The CP is ~ completed up to progress payments. ECAL, EMU and HCAL are > 50% complete, while Tridas and FPIX are only ~ 25% complete

  7. CSC - Labor Experience Early experience on CSC assembly is favorable. Now have ~ 35 of 148 CSC

  8. HCAL - M&S Cost Experience HB-1 pre-assembled at Felguera. Shipped to CERN . Megatiles will be inserted in bldg # 186. The mating of optics to absorber will begin at CERN in CY 2001.

  9. HB OPTICS - Labor Experience Labor experience for CSC and for HCAL optics has been good. This is the bulk of US CMS labor costs. M&S ~ OK, Labor ~ OK ==> worry about electronics (schedule) and installation (EDIA too).

  10. Closeout of Completed Tasks • FY96 - 99 completed tasks have been closed. • The ACWP can be compared to the BCWS for CV on these tasks. • In future tasks with end dates more than one year ago which are reported complete will be closed.

  11. Contingency Usage and Performance We have 34 months of monthly reporting. CR can be followed at any level of detail needed. We need to watch contingency following the SiTrkr baselineing.

  12. Financial Overview - II • TPC = Constant 167.25 (AYM$) • BAC 138.2 • Contingency = TPC - BAC 29.0 • ETC = BAC - BCWP 64.1 • BCWP/BAC 54 % • Contingency/ETC 45 % We have a fixed total cost. We are 54 % complete and retain 45% contingency on the estimated cost to complete.

  13. US CMS Contingency Use We started with 48.7 M$ in contingency. We have used 19.7 M$, retain 29.0 M$, and we are 54% complete. Of the increase, ~ 7 M$ is due to scope increases, so we have used ~12.7 M$ on better estimates of > BCWP = 74.1 M$ tasks (<17 %).

  14. US CMS Revised ML1

  15. LHC - V31 • Single beam in LHC 1/06 • 2 months LHC, then run 1 month • shutdown - complete CMS 4/06 • start run at 10^33 for 10 fb-1 8/06 Planning for installation and commissioning uses V31 for scheduling and planning. Note that late B.O. in UX means increased US CMS costs.

  16. Installation of CSC Balance limits w/ or w/o chamber Fully balanced chamber can rotate to any angle Counterweight Test of CSC Installation fixture W. Mason, F. Feyzi - UW/PSL

  17. HCAL Critical Path - V31

  18. CFEB CFEB CFEB CFEB CFEB ALCT LVDB CSC WBS 1 - Endcap Muon Final or next-to final Prototype Boards for all on-chamber electronics produced and tested.

  19. VME Cont ro l CLCT TMB DM B C C B M P C DDU-99 CCB-99 TMB-99 CLCT-99 DMB-99 Off-Chamber Electronics First Prototype Boards produced and tested (8.99)

  20. Location of Peripheral Crates YE2 walkway showing 600 sector of ME2 and VME crate

  21. WBS 2 - HCAL Optical Production • Over 20,000 scintillator tiles built and measured • RMS of fibers = 4.4% • RMS of tiles = 6.5% • RMS of wire/coll = 1.2% • RMS of average layer light yield = 4.6%

  22. HF - EDIA, FNAL -> RDMS 0.5 cm spacing, packing fraction, source tubes, edge chamfer design complete. Redesign was US scope increase.

  23. HPD - Anti-Reflection Angular “acceptance” and numerical aperture. Wavelength “acceptance” and photocathode response

  24. QIE Status - OK • Input Amplifiers/Splitters:  design finished, layout done. • Integrators: design finished, layout partially done. • FADC:  design finished, layout done • Range comparators and ranging logic:  not done • Biasing network:  not done • State machine, timing:  design being worked on now • LVDS drivers, receivers:  not done • Other digital logic: not doneTotal design submitted - on track so far - minor slippage. Yarema group is on track with their schedule

  25. WBS 3.1 Trigger • TDR Finished and available as CERN/LHCC 2000-038, CMS TDR 6.1December 15, 2000 • Met Level 1 Milestone for submission to LHCC by end of 2000. • Approved by LHCC, March, 2001

  26. Calorimeter Trigger Status(U. Wisconsin) • Successful Prototyping Program • Crate, 160 MHz Backplane & Clock Card • Receiver & Electron Isolation Cards tested • Adder ASIC tested & production finished • 4 Gbit/sec Copper 20 m link system tested • ASIC Prototypes • Tested* Phase & Boundary Scan delivered • Tested* Isolation & Sort delivered • *Tested by Vitesse • Testing Program Plans • Next generation Backplane finished • Next generation Receiver, Elect. Iso. Cards • Next generation Copper Link • New Vitesse Chip (72147216) • Test delivered ASIC prototypes • Simulation Program • New ORCA4 results verify performance

  27. Muon Trigger System Tests • Muon Port Card (Rice)  Sector Receiver (UCLA) • Data successfully sent from input of one MPC, through 100m of optical cables, to output of SR • Sector Receiver  Sector Processor (Florida) • Data successfully sent from input of one SR, through custom backplane, into the SP • Successfully sent data from three SRs connected to the SP to emulate an entire trigger sector • Clock and Control Board prototype (Rice) • Distributed clock & control signals w/ programmable delays • Port Card  Sector Receiver  Sector Processor • Successfully sent data from the input of two MPCs (representing ME2 and ME3), through one SR, and reconstructed tracks correctly in the SP • Complete chain test using simulated data from ORCA4

  28. WBS 3.2 DAQ • The DAQ effort continues in an R&D phase - watching and evaluating commercial developments. • The ML1 for DAQ is the TDR, due in 2002, postponed 1 year. • Paris Sphicas is US CMS L2 DAQ manager and CMS L2 PRS manager. Much work on forming and launching the 4 PRS groups has been accomplished.

  29. WBS 4 - ECAL • Avalanche Photodiodes • final structure selected. • Neutron Source operational. • Front-End Electronics • FPPA pilot wafers back and under test. • Honeywell Bit-serializer dropped, moved to CERN group. • Monitor Laser • Preparation for shipping laser to CERN.

  30. Temp / Leak FPU Logic Gain FPU Preamp Output Buffer Leak / Temp Mux Bias FPPA2000 (UHF1x) The FPPA is in final preproduction. The responsibility has shifted from Princeton to LBNL. Evaluation is in train.

  31. FPix. Sensors, 1st Subm. WBS 5 - FPIX Sensor Submission Before irradiation 90% of pixels have Vbrkdwn >300V After  = 1x1014 p/cm2 increase in current after 300V (2-8)% noisy channels (PSI) With  =6x1014 p/cm2 same I with pixels at -100C

  32. VHDI - Prototype VHDI for Row of 5 ROCs Test Station

  33. SiDet Assembly R&D Assembly of Detectors; NIKON coord. meas. Need 672 units Assembly of Butterflies; OMIS II meas. coord. Need 96 units

  34. CERN Test Beam Charge sharing vs position Pixels at 20o to beam  = 14 m over pixel 150 m 150 m Charge sharing vs position 150 m / 12 = 43 m  = 46 m over pixel Pixels normal to beam D:\LHM\2001\Presentations\Plenary Presentations\For Dan \Cern Test Result.ppt

  35. WBS 8 - SiTrkr

  36. Preparation for Pre-Production Mock-up frames for training gantries KSU Probe Station

  37. WBS 6 - Common Projects

  38. Detector Project Summary • M&S cost experience has been good. • The labor for CSC and HCAL absorber has been well estimated. • Contingency use has been good enough to allow for modest scope increases - SiTrkr • Planning for I&C is in train, with cost increases due to delay and re-estimations.

More Related