1 / 17

Getting Down with Determinants: Defining det ( A ) Via the PA = LU Decomposition

Getting Down with Determinants: Defining det ( A ) Via the PA = LU Decomposition. Henry Ricardo Medgar Evers College (CUNY) Brooklyn, NY henry@mec.cuny.edu Joint Mathematics Meetings San Diego, January 7, 2008. Seki and Leibniz. Cauchy. Cayley and Sylvester.

vic
Télécharger la présentation

Getting Down with Determinants: Defining det ( A ) Via the PA = LU Decomposition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Getting Down with Determinants:Defining det (A)Via thePA = LU Decomposition Henry Ricardo Medgar Evers College (CUNY) Brooklyn, NY henry@mec.cuny.edu Joint Mathematics Meetings San Diego, January 7, 2008

  2. Seki and Leibniz

  3. Cauchy

  4. Cayley and Sylvester

  5. …mathematics, like a river, is everchanging in its course, and major branches can dry up to become minor tributaries while small trickling brooks can develop into raging torrents. This is precisely what occurred with determinants and matrices. The study and use of determinants eventually gave way to Cayley’s matrix algebra, and today matrix and linear algebra are in the main stream of applied mathematics, whilethe role of determinants has been relegated to a minor backwater position. —Carl D. Meyer

  6. “Determinants are difficult, nonintuitive, and often defined without motivation.” —Sheldon Axler “Down with Determinants!” —Sheldon Axler (Amer. Math. Monthly102 (1995), 139-154)

  7. “It is hard to know what to say about determinants….” “There is one more problem about the determinant. It is difficult not only to decide on its importance, and its proper place in the theory of linear algebra, butalso to decide on its definition.”[emphasis mine] - Gilbert Strang, Linear Algebra and Its Applications (3rdEdn.)

  8. The Usual Suspects • Laplace’s expansion (minors/cofactors) • Permutation definition • Uniquealternating multilinear function • Signedvolume of a parallelepiped

  9. Preliminaries I • Gaussian elimination • elementary row operations • REF (not unique) • RREF (unique) • Elementary matrices (3 types) • elementary row ops via premultiplication • Invertible matrices

  10. Preliminaries II • LU Decomposition • doesn’t always exist • is unique if a nonsingular matrix has an LU factorization • can be used to solve a system:

  11. Preliminaries III • PA = LU Decomposition • always exists • is unique if A is nonsingular (i.e., prod. of is unique) • can be used to solve a system:

  12. DEFINITION Given an n × n matrix A, the determinant of A, denoted det (A) or |A|, is defined as follows: where and k is the number of row interchanges represented by P.

  13. Example

  14. Example(Cont.) Note: det (A) = (-1)(-1)(1)(-27) = -27 . So by forward substitution (top-down)

  15. Example(Cont.) So by back substitution c =

  16. Properties Standard properties of the determinant follow easily from previous work with elementary matrices and from the definition itself.

  17. Summary • The determinant appears as a natural consequence of using the PA = LU factorization to solve a system of equations. • “Handwaving” is minimal. • Standard properties of an n x n determinant follow easily.

More Related