1 / 17

WP9 update and detailed planning of remaining tasks and persons responsible

WP9 update and detailed planning of remaining tasks and persons responsible . Geoff Gooch, Alistair Rieu -Clarke, Andrew Allan & Armelle Guignier 3 rd Consortium Meeting, India Jan 2011. WP9 Update. Milestones 9.1 Initial governance report 9.2 Case-study analysis 9.3 Recommendations.

vicki
Télécharger la présentation

WP9 update and detailed planning of remaining tasks and persons responsible

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WP9 update and detailed planning of remaining tasks and persons responsible Geoff Gooch, Alistair Rieu-Clarke, Andrew Allan & ArmelleGuignier 3rd Consortium Meeting, India Jan 2011

  2. WP9 Update Milestones 9.1 Initial governance report 9.2 Case-study analysis 9.3 Recommendations

  3. M9.1 Initial Governance Report • Aims and objectives: • Defining concepts • Mapping of international, regional and national legal, policy and institutional framework • Report available on the LiveDiverse public website (under Publications)

  4. M9.2 Case study Analysis • Describing the existing governance system of the case-study area • Identifying and analysing the factors influencing their implementation (rule quality and actor networks) • Rule quality • Coherence (law and policy framework(s)) • Determinacy (degree of commitment) • Actor networks • How does the relationship between actors affect implementation • Proposing strategies to overcome barriers to implementation

  5. Methodology • Desktop research on the legal and policy framework pertaining to biodiversity and livelihood • Mapping of institutions and actors – actor network theory • Interviews with experts knowledgeable in the area of law and policy implementation • Current status • Data gathering complete (desktop & fieldtrips) • Conducting case study analysis

  6. South Africa Case Study • Research question: • To what extent does the existing law and policy architecture support biodiversity conservation and sustainable livelihoods in the Mutale river basin? • Specific focus on the interplay between three different governance regimes: Makuya Park, Lake Fundudzi & Vhembe (UNESCO) Biosphere Reserve Park, a provincial nature reserve connected to the Kruger National Park; Lake Fundudzi, a sacred site, and the UNESCO Vhembe Biosphere Reserve • Key activities to date • Desktop research, interviews with experts completed • Report underway • Key findings to date • Well developed law & policy framework but needs effective implementation • Legal status of protected areas • Fragmentation between different legal frameworks for conservation (environmental & cultural) • Lake Fundudzi • Makuya (plus Kruger/ GLTFP) • UNESCO Biosphere Reserve • Traditional version formal (new wave of policy) • CBNRM/ Conservation/ Tourism vis-à-vis Traditional governance model • Development (economic/ short-term), e.g., Mining vis-à-vis Conservation • Next steps? • Complete report and circulate among experts & look to publications

  7. Costa Rica Case Study • Research question: • To what extent the current law and policy architecture supports both biodiversity conservation and sustainable livelihoods in the Térraba-Sierpe River Basin? • Key activities to date • Desktop researches completed, interviews with experts done • Key findings to date: • A fully-fledged legal and policy framework encompassing all areas of regulations of interest of the case-study area, BUT • Many factors influencing its implementation: • Lack of consistency between environmental priorities and other sectors (latest example: the international airport in the case-study area) • Lack of holistic legal framework • Lack of implementation of judicial decisions • Confusion over the different institutions in charge of land use planning and access to natural resources • Shortcomings of the structure and process of the environmental impact assessment (consequences with respect to El Diquís hydropower dam project) • Strategies? • Potential and conditions for an Integrated River Basin and Coastal Management • Next steps: • Complete report and circulate among experts & look to publications

  8. India Case Study • Key activities to date • Desktop research, interviews with experts completed • Report underway • Key findings to date • Lack of resources to implement obligations • Institutional fragmentation, capacity limitation and red tape • Transparency • Conflicting subsidies • Policy implementation • Next steps? - Complete report and circulate among experts & look to publications

  9. Vietnam Case Study • Research question: • To what extent the current law and policy architecture supports both biodiversity conservation and sustainable livelihoods in the Ba Be and Na Hang nature complex? • Key activities to date • Desktop research completed, interviews with experts done • Report underway • Key findings to date: • A renovated legal and policy framework and its potential benefit for both biodiversity conservation and livelihoods’ improvements ( new law on biodiversity, new decree on payment for forest services (buzz word or real impact?)) • Need for more consistency in the implementation process • A political will to reach international protection/recognition for the case-study area but what will be the consequences on the national and local level in terms of rights and obligations • Next steps? • Complete report and circulate among experts & look to publications

  10. WP9 Future Activities • Completion of M9.2 • Draft reports should be completed by end of Month 25 • Draft reports to be circulated for review among case-study partners and national experts • Reports to be circulated during the 3rd/ 4th round of stakeholders meetings

  11. Milestone 9.3 & Deliverable 9.1 • Objectives: formulation of recommendations for new policies and policy combinations for sustainable livelihoods and diversity that take into account existing and potential institutional interactions in the formulation and implementation of the policy process • Should combine work of all workpackages • Due Month 33

  12. Dissemination plans

  13. Publication plans (need to prioritise!) Edited book • Governing protected areas in developing countries: an analysis of barriers to implementation in Costa Rica, India, South Africa and Vietnam Peer-review journal papers • Dams and process • Environmental law and religion/spirituality ad local knowledge • Forests management/conservation by local communities in the context of protected areas • Implementing payments for ecosystem services through law • Indigenous rights/ minorities rights and biodiversity conservation • Mining vs. Biodiversity Conservation: Can law reconcile competing interests? • Participating in protected area governance – how to get from commitment to compliance • The protection of aquatic sacred and cultural sites – an analysis of Lake Fundudzi & Ba Be Lake • The role of MEAs in protecting local biodiversity – an analysis of Ba Be Lake (Vietnam), and Terraba-Sierpe (Costa Rica) • The Law on Biodiversity in Vietnam

  14. Who does what?Remaining Person-months for WP9

  15. Who does what? • Case study partners • Support to complete M9.2 • Collaborate to complete D9.3 • All partners • Collaborate on publications (ed. Book, peer-review journals, etc).

More Related