1 / 27

IX International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle Physics

IX International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle Physics Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, October 10 - 14, 2006. SPIN OBSERVABLES IN BARYON-BARYON INTERACTIONS @ DISTO. Marco Maggiora Dipartimento di Fisica ``A. Avogadro'' and INFN - Torino, Italy.

Télécharger la présentation

IX International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IX International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle Physics Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, October 10 - 14, 2006 SPIN OBSERVABLES IN BARYON-BARYON INTERACTIONS @ DISTO Marco Maggiora Dipartimento di Fisica ``A. Avogadro'' and INFN - Torino, Italy

  2. DISTO @ Saturne: polarised proton beam up to T = 2.9 Gev Acceptance: • 2-cm thick unpolarised LH2 target • S170 magnet (<14.7 KGauss,  =  120 , =  20) • semi-cylindrical 1mm-square scintillating fibers triplets inside magnet • MWPC planar triplets outside magnet • scintillator hodoscopes vertically and horizontally segmented • scintillator hodoscopes as polarimeter slabs • doped water Cerenkov counters

  3. Hyperon production @ DISTO GOAL:first exclusive (kinematically complete) measurements with a polarised beam for Reaction Detected Prongs 1.58 1.79 2.34 2.40

  4. Hyperon events’ topology – Data @ 2.94 , 3.31 and 3.67 GeV complete reconstruction  missing 0 and/or  missing • DECAY VERTEX: • REACTION VERTEX: • 1 positive track • 1 negative track • 2 positives tracks

  5. Spin observables Y dependence on the spin of the proton from the beam transfer of the transverse component of to Depolarisation Analysing power

  6. Spin observables: experimental asymmetries •  =  15.5 • most of events are acquired at high cos() Self-analysing  weak decay:

  7. pp elastic scattering: ping pong trigger Poor data from literature In particular @ 3.67 GeV/c Errors for spin obs do not include contribution from Elastic proton-proton scattering p" p ! pp pp elastic scattering acquired for some spills every run • beam polarisation continuos evaluation • data validation L and R on one side only free from L/R acceptance PB↑and PB↓ simultaneously acquired

  8. Hyperon production: event reconstruction . Unrefitted M- p Reffitted MpK

  9. DYY evaluation: accounting for hyperon contamination • select exclusive  and ‘s from 0 decay through a MpK cut • evaluate separately and • estimate relative contaminations , the fraction of  and 0 in • each gate, evaluated throught fit functions integration in each gate. Of course is • extract the corrected DYY values from the linear combinations: • no cos dependence ) direct evaluation of  and 0 yealds DYY EVALUATION: 0.7 · |cos |· 1. AY EVALUATION: 0.7 · |cos |· 1.

  10. DYY @ 2.94 , 3.31 and 3.67 GeV/c – Exclusive Λ production - 0.7 ≤ xF ≤ 0.9 ; 0. ≤ pT ≤ 750 Mev/c ; |cos φΛ| ≤ 0.7 • Exclusive Λproduction: • DYYsizeable and negative • smooth energy dependence

  11. DYY @ 2.94 , 3.31 and 3.67 GeV/c – Λ from Σ0 decay - 0.7 ≤ xF ≤ 0.9 ; 0. ≤ pT ≤ 750 Mev/c ; |cos φΛ| ≤ 0.7 • Λ from decay: • DYYstrongly different from the one of exclusive Λ • positive and negative values • smooth energy dependence

  12. AY @ 2.94 , 3.31 and 3.67 GeV/c – Exclusive Λ production - 0.7 ≤ xF ≤ 0.9 ; 0. ≤ pT ≤ 750 Mev/c ; |cos φΛ| ≤ 0.7 • Exclusive Λproduction: • effects less important vs DYY • smooth energy dependence

  13. AY @ 2.94 , 3.31 and 3.67 GeV/c – Λ from Σ0 decay - 0.7 ≤ xF ≤ 0.9 ; 0. ≤ pT ≤ 750 Mev/c ; |cos φΛ| ≤ 0.7 • Λ from decay: • differences from exclusive Λ AY • smooth energy dependence

  14. DYY @ 2.94 , 3.31 and 3.67 GeV/c – Exclusive Λ production FIRST EXCLUSIVE DATA AVAILABLE, FIRST DATA IN THE TFR (xF < 0 ) • Inclusive Λproduction: • high energy )DYY > 0 • Exclusive Λproduction: • lower energy) DYY < 0 • Exclusive Λ from Σ0 decay: • lower energy)≠ DYY Different reaction mechanism?

  15. DYY theoretical predictions – Exclusive Λ production . DIRECT FUSION MODEL[1] DYYSIZEABLE AND POSITIVE Polarisation transfer mechanism: [1] C. Boros and Liang Zuo-tang, Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 2279

  16. DYY theoretical predictions – Exclusive Λ production LAGET’S OBE MODEL[1] NEGATIVE DYY CAN BE INTERPRETED xF << 0 (TFR): DNN = 0 xF >> 0 (BFR): kaon) DNN = -1 pion) DNN = +1 [1]J. M. Laget, Phys. Lett. B259 (1991) 24.

  17. Conclusions • Λ from decay: • DYYstrongly different from the one of exclusive Λ • positive and negative values • smooth energy dependence • first exclusive data available • first data in the TFR (xF < 0 ) region • first data for the exclusive selection of the Λ from Σ0 decay • Exclusive Λproduction: • DYYsizeable and negative • smooth energy dependence • DYY not easily interpreted in a quark-model framework • OBE approach can account with FSI for DYY < 0 • Both Λproduction: • effects less important vs DYY • smooth energy dependence

  18. Question time QUESTION TIME

  19. 4body event reconstruction @ DISTO pattern reconstruction and track fitting iteration: pattern recognition provides candidate for the fitting stage; input is the 12D coordinates vector track fitting: 5D parameter vector (x,y): coordinates of the intersection point with z = 0 a: inclination of track at z = 0 : starting angle in (x-z) plane : inverse momentum perpendicolar to B detector coordinated depend smootly on all parameters

  20. 4body event reconstruction @ DISTO track fitting by lookup table: goal is inverting in look-up table: 5D lattice that provide for tracks track coordinates consist in linear interpolation of the lattice to obtain 2 minimisation: F inversion is performed minimizing: iteration stops if do not change to nearest grid point

  21. 4body event reconstruction @ DISTO kinematically constrained refit: • global 4 tracks – 2 vertices refit • same approach, inversion of • more complex parameter 18D • 3 (x12,y12,z12) for the reaction vertex • six (1, a1, pxz,1, 2, a2, pxz,2 to describe momenta of the two track emerging from the reaction vertex • 3 (x12,y12,z12) for decay vertex • six (3, a3, pxz,3, 4, a4, pxz,4 to describe momenta of the two track emerging from the decay vertex • 4 degrees of freedom are constrained kinematically

  22. Hyperon production: reconstruction @ DISTO kinematic constrains: • reconstructed  momentun parallel to the joiner of the reaction and decay verteces ) 2 parameters • reconstructed M- p at decay vertex is M = 1.115 GeV/c2) 1 parameter • M4B= 0 ( or ) or M4B= M ( ) ) 1 parameter 14D “soft” constraint on reaction vertex along the beam

  23. Hyperon production: event selection • One of the most effective cuts in event selection is • the kinematically constrained refit itself! • M- p = M • M4B = 0 or M4B = M • Additional cuts: • + veto • |p,| < 0.15 rad, decay proton momentun in LF • p ID for positive track from decay vertex • ptot< 1 GeV/c ) missing a  at most • |vz| < 3.5 cm ) Klegecell veto Kinematic region restricted to: -0.7 ≤ xF ≤ 0.9 pT ≤ 750 MeV/c |cos | < 0.7

  24. Particle identification @ DISTO particle identication: iterative process for tagging candidates + veto: pp+- is major background

  25. Particle identification @ DISTO particle identication: combined Cerenkon and hodoscopes tagging very small + contamination in hyperon sample

  26. Spin observables: inferring  polarisation sign of PB Self-analysing  weak decay: Geometrical interpretation of AN:

  27. DYY theoretical predictions – Exclusive Λ production LAGET’S OBE MODEL[1] NEGATIVE DYY CAN BE INTERPRETED [1]J. M. Laget, Phys. Lett. B259 (1991) 24.

More Related