1 / 13

Siri Brorstad Borlaug and Magnus Gulbrandsen

Siri Brorstad Borlaug and Magnus Gulbrandsen. Inside centres of excellence – funding schemes’ effect on researchers role identity and practices. Motivation.

vivi
Télécharger la présentation

Siri Brorstad Borlaug and Magnus Gulbrandsen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Siri Brorstad Borlaug and Magnus Gulbrandsen Inside centres of excellence – funding schemes’ effect on researchers role identity and practices

  2. Motivation • The innovation literature often emphasise the synergies between academic excellence and (potential) for innovation (e.g.VanLooy et al., 2006 and Nesta, 2006) • High correlations between high quality publication and academic entrepreneurship • Researchers experience tensions between different role identities • Academia and commerce • Policy’s focus on combination of excellence and innovation through dedicated funding schemes – a golden opportunity to study researchers role in relation to the goals of excellence and innovation

  3. Research question • How do funding schemes aiming at excellence and innovation affect researcher role identity and practices?

  4. Researchers’ role identity • Basic and applied research functions as normative identity markers • Settler – merchant (Atkinson-Grosjean, 2006) • Buffering processes towards the world of industry and science (neither in nor out) • Researchers’ conception of own identity and their practices areaffected by institutional logics

  5. Institutional logics of excellence and innovation • Institutional logics (Friedland and Alford, 1991) • Excellence and innovation- ambiguous concepts • Excellence associated with basic research, high quality publications, open science (Gulbrandsen& Kyvik, 2010; Lamont, 2009) • Innovation associated with applied research, knowledge and technology transfer (Hollingsworth, 2008; Geuna& Muscio, 2009) • Track these associations to early writing on the norms of science and norms of innovation (Merton, 1973; Mitroff, 1974): • Universalism versus particularism • Communalism versus private property • Disinterestedness versus personal interest

  6. Method • Case study of 8 centres • 4 Centres of Excellence in Research and Innovation (CoERI) • 4 Centres of Excellence (CoE) • Sweden and Norway • One university in each country (largest and oldest, classical multi-disciplinary) • Semi-structured interviews with 33 researchers

  7. Centre of Excellence and Centre of Excellence in Research and Innovation- what are they? CoE • Time limited research centres, characterised by concentrated, focused and long-term fundamental research on a high international level • 10 years • Partners: Universities, colleges and research institutes • Main selection criteria: Scientific quality CoERI • Time limited research and innovation centres aimed at supporting long-term research that generates new knowledge and technology for innovation • 8-10 years • Partners: Universities, colleges, research institutes, firms and public offices • Main selection criteria: Scientific quality and potential for innovation and value creation

  8. Organisational conditions • Formal/informal collaboration with industry and public agencies • Formation of centre: embedded networks or engineered/emerging • The institutional logics of innovation is embedded in the CoERI - scheme

  9. Researchers’ role

  10. Practices

  11. Four categories

  12. Overall results • Technology transfer – individual practices in all centres – also in CoERIs (which has this as a goal) • CoERI perceived as less acknowledge by peers and the university • CoE the A-team

  13. Conclusion • Funding mechanisms dedicated to excellence and innovation affect researchers’ identity • Different degrees of negotiations between the two logics from bridging to buffering • Organisational conditions important • embedded/emerging networks • Formal/informal collaboration • They do not affect researchers’ technology transfer practices

More Related