1 / 35

Perceptions of Achievement and Satisfaction as Related to Interactions in Online Courses

Perceptions of Achievement and Satisfaction as Related to Interactions in Online Courses. EdMedia 2014 June 26, 2014. William Rainey Harper . University of Chicago – 1881 Many faculty members were outraged. 20 th Century. College administrators U.S. Military

von
Télécharger la présentation

Perceptions of Achievement and Satisfaction as Related to Interactions in Online Courses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perceptions of Achievement and Satisfaction as Related to Interactions in Online Courses

  2. EdMedia 2014June 26, 2014

  3. William Rainey Harper • University of Chicago – 1881 • Many faculty members were outraged

  4. 20th Century • College administrators • U.S. Military • People that didn’t live near a college

  5. Michael Moore Student-instructor interaction Student-student interaction Student-content interaction

  6. Student-Instructor Interaction • Assignment directions • Questions about assignments • Assignment Feedback • Personal correspondence

  7. Student- Student Interaction • Questions about assignments • Sharing notes / information • Collaborating on assignments • Peer feedback

  8. Student-Content Interaction • Reading textbook / journal article • Reviewing content based Web sites • Writing an essay • Creating a lesson / unit plan

  9. Why Study Interaction? • Create successful online courses • Ensure students learn • Quiet the naysayers

  10. Research Question One Is there a statistically significant degree of differences or variations in student-instructor interaction, student-student interaction, or student-content interaction and student perceived achievement in online graduate courses in the field of education?

  11. Research Question Two Is there a statistically significant degree of differences or variations in student-instructor interaction, student-student interaction, or student-content interaction and student satisfaction in online graduate courses in the field of education?

  12. How was the study conducted? • A purposive sample of 300 K-12 educators enrolled in online graduate classes in the field of education

  13. How was the study conducted?

  14. How was the study conducted? • Student-instructor interaction – 8 questions • Student-student interaction – 7 questions • Student-content interaction – 3 questions • Student perceived achievement – 5 questions • Student satisfaction – 7 questions

  15. Cronbach's Alpha For Instrument

  16. Study Results • Each type of interaction occurred • Learning theories • Each type of interaction has an influence on student perceived achievement.

  17. Comparing Interactions

  18. Student-Instructor Interaction • The instructor treated me as an individual • I felt that I had adequate opportunity to communicate with my instructor • I knew what work was expected of me and what deadlines were approaching for assignments.

  19. Student-Student Interaction • I was able to share learning experiences with other students • Increased contact with fellow students helped me get more out of this course • I felt that I shared a sense of community with my classmates.

  20. Student-Content Interaction • The forum boards helped me understand course content • I learned to interrelate the important issues in the course material • I developed the ability to communicate clearly about the subject

  21. Perceived Achievement • I improved my ability to integrate facts and develop generalizations from the course material • I learned to identify the central issues of the course • I learned concepts and principles in this course

  22. Perceived student achievement

  23. Student Satisfaction • I enjoyed the structure/format of the class • I was very satisfied with this course • I feel that this course served my needs well

  24. Student satisfaction

  25. What does this mean? • The instructor has the most influence in both learning and satisfaction • Students really like relevant assignments • Students only want to interact with each other if it is meaningful

  26. Sense of Community • Students do not need to feel a sense of community to achieve

  27. What does this mean? • Students perceive that interacting with each other has a negative impact on their achievement • Student-student interaction does not contribute to satisfaction

  28. Implications • Explicit assignment directions • Qualitative and quantitative feedback • Ensure that quality student-content interaction occurs. • Assignments that focus on higher order thinking skills

  29. Limitations • Educators in graduate level courses • Courses offered entirely online • Student prior knowledge of content • Communication requirements for instructors • Communication requirements for students

  30. What We Need To Do Create purposeful student-instructor interaction in online classes Require instructors to communicate with students Design meaningful activities

  31. Assumptions • Students may have had perceived that type of interaction as more important than interaction with other students • Since the students perceive the instructor as available, they do not see the need to interact with other students.

  32. Recommendation for practice • Review how each of these interactions are addressed in online classes. • Create requirements for student-instructor interaction • Incorporate meaningful student-content interaction

  33. Limitations • Design • Framework • Perceived learning and satisfaction are perceptual measures. • Sample size • Purposive sample • Not applicable to face to face

  34. Limitations • Non traditional students • Age of participants • Organizational issues

  35. kristi@dr-bordelon.comhttp://www.dr-bordelon.com/research.htmlkristi@dr-bordelon.comhttp://www.dr-bordelon.com/research.html

More Related