1 / 73

Dynamics of human eye-movements & visual search

Dynamics of human eye-movements & visual search. 6/12/08--Presentation for RU CBIM center. Deborah J. Aks. RU-Center for Cognitive Sciences (RuCCs). daks@rci.rutgers.edu. Background research: Perceptual dynamics http://aks.rutgers.edu/. Overview.

wayne
Télécharger la présentation

Dynamics of human eye-movements & visual search

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dynamics of human eye-movements & visual search 6/12/08--Presentation for RU CBIM center Deborah J. Aks RU-Center for Cognitive Sciences (RuCCs) daks@rci.rutgers.edu Background research:Perceptual dynamics http://aks.rutgers.edu/..

  2. Overview • Visual search studies---------------------------- • Tools to study dynamics • Eye-tracking • Stats, time-series analysis • Power laws (PDFs & power spectra) • Sources of (1/f) power laws:SOC, feedback & recurrent models

  3. Visual search & tumor detection • Mammograms • x-rays, CT-scans • Ultrasound • MRI…

  4. Challenging search task:Is there a tumor in this mammogram? (x, y) = (0,0) (1024, 0) mov (1024, 768) (x, y) = (0,768) Image source: Society for Breast Imaging (SBI)

  5. Abnormal Features Image source:Edward J. Delp; Purdue University School of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Video and Image Processing Laboratory (VIPER) West Lafayette, Indiana, ace@ecn.purdue.edu http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/courseware/cs298/fall99/delp/berkeley99.htm http://www.ece.purdue.edu/~ace

  6. Human -vs- Computer-aided detection Both use search, feature detection & classification • Human advantage: • Pattern recognition & implicit learning • (Unsystematic) search patterns can be effective • Computer advantage: • Explicit memory • Only biases are those built into algorithm • Thorough & systematic search • No fatigue

  7. (0,0) (1024, 0) X,Y - Eye Samples (1 per ms) (x, y) = (0,768) (1024, 768)

  8. (0,0) (1024, 0) Saccades (0,768) (1024, 768)

  9. (0,0) (1024, 0) Fixations (0,768) (1024, 768)

  10. (0,0) (1024, 0) (0,768) (1024, 768)

  11. Dynamical toolsTime series (x,y eye-samples) x y

  12. Time series (x,y eye-samples) x rt lft up y down

  13. Time series Saccades Fixations y x

  14. Time series Saccades Fixations

  15. Time series Pupil Velocity Eye-samples: Saccade x y Fixation y Acceleration down x rt

  16. Velocity y Acceleration Saccades Fixations x

  17. Map trajectory of eye scan-paths: • x,y coordinates(position over time) • ------------------------------------------------------- • Saccades & Fixations: • Sequences (xi, xi+1.. xn) & (yi, yi+1.. yn) • Differences (xn – xn+1 ) & (yn – yn+1) • Distance =(x2 + y2)1/2 • Duration(msec, sec…) • Direction = Arctan (y/x)

  18. Dynamical tools • Descriptive & Correlational Statistics • Scatter & Delay plots • Probability Distributions (PDFs) • Power spectra (FFT)… • Autocorrelation • Visual Recurrent Analysis (VRA) • Relative Dispersion (SD/M) • Rescaled range (R/S) • Iterated Functions Systems (IFS)

  19. Study 1 • What guides complicated eye movements? • Random or non-random process? • Is there (long-range) memory across fixations? • Might neural interactions drive search? • METHOD OF TESTING. • Challenging visual search task

  20. Find the upright “T” T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T

  21. Eye Fixations Scatter plot of 10,215 eye fixations for the entire visual search experiment.

  22. Conventional GLM analyses… What’s the central tendency (i.e., typical scale)? • 24 fixations per trial (on average) • 5 seconds (SD =7 sec) per trial • Mean fixation duration = 212 ms (SD = 89 ms)

  23. Scaling across 8 sessions: Changes in fixations over time: • Frequency decreased from 1888 to 657 • Duration increased from 206 to 217 ms. • Position … • xn – xn+1 decreased • yn – yn+1 increased No typical scale!

  24. Heavy-tail distributions • Small eye-mvmts are (very) common; large ones are rare! • Power-laws (?) xn - x n+1

  25. Scale-free --> Rethinking what we study & measure Power laws! Many # Few Small Large Size (of behavior)

  26. PDF’s & Networks A. Kurakin

  27. Brain network Edelman, G. & Tononi, G. (2000).A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination..

  28. Mainzer, K. (1997). Thinking in complexity: The complex dynamics of matter, mind & mankind. Berlin: Springer. Pg. 128

  29. Focusing on the dynamic… How does info decay over time?

  30. Delay Plot of Fixations yn-vs- y n+1

  31. Spectral analysis (e.g., FFT) Characterize frequencies making up time series f a f -2 = 1/ f 2

  32. Noisy time series White Pink Brown

  33. “Color’ or pattern White 1/f 0 1/f Pink 1/f 2 Brown

  34. PowerSpectra of eye samples 

  35. Fixations & their 1st differences  = -.6

  36. Distance across eye fixations (x2 + y2) 1/2  = -.47

  37. Distance across eye fixations (x2 + y2) 1/2  = -.47  = -0.3  = -1.8

  38. Preliminary (FFT) results: • Sequence of… • sampled eye positions --> 1/f brown noise • local random walk • Fixation sequence & their differences--> ~1/f pink noise • Subtle long-term memory.

  39. Power law (PDFs) & power spectra (FFT) indicates… • Memory • Steepness of the slope (on a log-log scale) reflects.. • Correlation across data points = ‘Colored’ noise • Pink (1/f) • Brown (1/f^2) • Fractal properties: • Scale-free (means  w/ measuring resolution) • Self-similar (statistically) • Critical + flexible + self-organizing (1/f)

  40. Ongoing experiments: • What conditions produce 1/f pink noise? • Do power laws change under different conditions? • Structured vs. unstructured contexts? • Simple vs. complex backgrounds? • Do 1/f patterns produce more effective search? • Do power laws change as we learn?

  41. Study 2: Search Displays Complexity --->

  42. Search Displays w/ scan paths

  43. Baseline: Scanning edge

  44. Extrinsic vs. Intrinsic influence on search

  45. Source of 1/f dynamic? (Major controversy!)

More Related