1 / 61

Lauren Christian Endowed Lecture Egbert F. Knol

Peri-natal survival of piglets understanding and genetics. Lauren Christian Endowed Lecture Egbert F. Knol. Road map. Challenge Our business is efficient pork production Our responsibility is to maintain animal integrity Pork chain mortality is out of bounds in many situations

wells
Télécharger la présentation

Lauren Christian Endowed Lecture Egbert F. Knol

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Peri-natal survival of piglets understanding and genetics Lauren Christian Endowed Lecture Egbert F. Knol

  2. Road map Challenge • Our business is efficient pork production • Our responsibility is to maintain animal integrity • Pork chain mortality is out of bounds in many situations Peri-natal survival: • Basics • Genetics • Piglet side : vitality • Nurse sow side : mothering ability Genomics will help Mission for all of us

  3. Challenge

  4. Our business FARROW FINISH PORK FEED

  5. Efficiency FARROW FINISH PORK FEED PORK FE =----------- FEED

  6. Losses on the way FARROW FINISH FEED PORK † † † † † † † † † † † Losses drain efficiency; feed is invested, but not harvested

  7. GOOD: 12 weaned FARROW FINISH Gestation lactation nursery finishing LOSSES 30 ova shed 15 piglets born 1 stillborn 14.3% PWM 2% nursery 5% sow mortality 3% finishing 76% of total born reaches plant

  8. GOOD: 12 weaned FARROW FINISH Gestation lactation nursery finishing LOSSES 30 ova shed 15 piglets born Crowding? Selection for increased litter size overdone? (Canada, university of Alberta, Foxcroft et al.)

  9. GOOD: 12 weaned FARROW FINISH Gestation lactation nursery finishing LOSSES 30 ova shed 15 piglets born 1 stillborn 14.3% PWM 2% nursery 20% peri-natal mortality in a good situation

  10. GOOD: 12 weaned FARROW FINISH Gestation lactation nursery finishing   farrowing survival preweaning survival Correlated responses backward and forward

  11. Added challenge Hours spent per piglet in a farrowing unit Hours Year

  12. Basics

  13. Modeling of test farm Frequency/% survival Weight (kg) Bell curve is birth weight distribution S – curve is Survival curve

  14. Increasing birth weight

  15. Reducing variation

  16. Increasing survival

  17. Duroc (black) against Pietrain

  18. Sire differences Pre-weaning survival >350 offspring each 2 lbs 4 lbs

  19. Genetics of survival

  20. Death: whom to blame? Genes of the piglet? Genes of the sow? Genes of the foster?

  21. Genetic models Classic approach • Litter mortality = HYS + sow (+ error) • Litter survival = HYS + service sire + sow Improved (still recording at litter level) • Litter survival = HYS + service sire + sow Our perception • Piglet survival = HYS + f(BW) + animal + dam + foster • Animal = piglet vitality, • Dam = uterine quality and • Foster = mothering ability

  22. Piglet weighing > 500,000 piglets per per year

  23. Validation: 100 low against 100 high EBV litters

  24. Validation: 100 low against 100 high EBV litters

  25. Validation: 100 low against 100 high EBV litters

  26. Piglet vitality The animal effect from the model

  27. Why does it work? • 25 high EBV gilts mated to high EBV boars • 25 low low • All 50 caesarian sectioned 2 days before farrowing, placentae weighed • All 650 piglets fully dissected • Organs weighed, length of intestinal tract, blood parameters etc. etc. • More vital: heavier livers, more glycogen (P=0.04)

  28. 2000 1600 1200 Weight piglet 800 400 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Weight placenta Blue: high EBV litters Jascha Leenhouwers en Tette van der Lende

  29. High EBV litters more cortisol Jascha Leenhouwers, JAS 2002

  30. Stronger piglets, not heavier!

  31. Mothering ability Foster effect from the model

  32. What do we LIKE in a sow • Quiet • Attentive • Enough teats • Quality of teats • Enough milk • Uniformity at birth and at weaning • Maintenance of body condition • .... Lots of grad students needed… Or: use EBV for mothering ability

  33. 1. Visual scan sampling • 4 hours walking through farrowing rooms • Visually ‘Scanning’ each sow every 5 minutes • 5 observation days (days -2, 0, 7, 14) • 80 sows, 150 traits

  34. Position

  35. Behaviour

  36. 2. Open field test

  37. 3. Aggression test

  38. 4. Questionnaire

  39. Results: 1. Scan sampling Sows with high EBV-MA: • Less changes of posture • Less activity • Less in sitting position

  40. Results: 2. Open field test Sows with high EBV-MA: • More exploring behaviour in open field

  41. Results: 3. Aggression test Sows with high EBV-MA: • More lying laterally • More vocalisation • Less aggression (biting plush piglet)!!!

  42. Results 4. Questionnaire

  43. Conclusion Statistical model results in what we want: • Quiet • Attentive • Enough teats • Quality of teats • Uniformity at birth and at weaning No need for grad students here

  44. Implementation in breeding program

  45. EBV estimation 4 million piglets weighed 1.2 million sows 2 million piglets with underline count

  46. Validation 1 take out 10,000 records 2 estimate breeding values on the remaining data 3 predict the 10,000 4 expected b-value should be 1.00

  47. General conclusions • Survival: management = selection • Survival selection: hard work, but feasible • Most genetic companies select, be it with different tools • Faster than economic progress should be an option • Longer gestation, lower variation in bw, but not higher bw Next table closer than you might expect

  48. Labour per piglet produced

  49. Miranda’s slide, quoted by Foxcroft in Banff

  50. Validation of this graph: 2 extreme sows

More Related