1 / 15

NTSA Engineering Forum Revitalizing Systems Engineering 21 July 2004

NTSA Engineering Forum Revitalizing Systems Engineering 21 July 2004. Mark Adducchio Director of Engineering (acting) USAF Training Systems Product Group mark.adducchio@wpafb.af.mil (937) 255-7388 x3257. NTSA Engineering Forum Revitalizing Systems Engineering.

wenda
Télécharger la présentation

NTSA Engineering Forum Revitalizing Systems Engineering 21 July 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering21 July 2004 Mark Adducchio Director of Engineering (acting) USAF Training Systems Product Group mark.adducchio@wpafb.af.mil (937) 255-7388 x3257

  2. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • Renewed interest in Systems Engineering from AF leadership • Some policy & guidance rolling in from both OSD & SecAF - pending within ASC and the TSPG • TSPG & Industry should go forward single-mindedly with what works, what’s useful, and what’s reasonable

  3. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • Objectives • Gain a clear idea on ways to apply systems engineering initiatives to training systems developments • How best to formulate future training systems acquisitions to reflect these initiatives • How to stimulate good systems engineering processes that directly relate to delivering the product

  4. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • TSA • Contractor SE capabilities/practices evaluated during source selection • Task orders assume SE in place • No specific SE requirements • SE assessment of task order proposals integrated into IMP/IMS evaluation • For individual orders, contractor determines scope of SE effort • Typically risk management, reviews, IMP/IMS, Req’t tracking • SE Incentives schedule milestones • Nothing precludes additional SE requirements from task orders

  5. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • Discrete Programs (non-TSA) • Treat SE as needed and/or per prevailing policy/climate • SE requirements thoroughly defined on some programs  C-17 MTS • Some dictated by parent program F/A-22

  6. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • How is SE managed in the TSPG? • Program specific • Reliant on contractor emphasis & practices • Individual experience • Sometimes personality driven • Usually tied to the IMP/IMS • Few institutional guidelines • IRM, DAU guides and courses • OSS&E • Gov’t specific indicators based in Tech Health charts

  7. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • Technical Health Charts • Subjective assessment on complexity and progress • Risk items • Issues • TD count

  8. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • Current Issues • Obscure requirements & requirements drill-down • Milestone preparation – design review criteria & expectations • Poorly defined HSI completion criteria – premature testing SE staying power • Risk identification between contractor & Gov’t diverge • CM failures • Integration of engineering activities w/ management controls & indicators

  9. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • Renewed emphasis on SE processes • Risk Management • Engineering/developmental milestones • Incentives • More Gov’t guidance • Likely no new standards (i.e. MIL-STD-499B) • CMMI?

  10. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • Establish more robust SE policy & guidance within TSPG • Consistent application of SE practices within TSPG • ASC policies & guidance • Operating instructions • Training • TSA III emphasis • TSA II Task orders

  11. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • How Do We Apply To Our Programs • Contractor defined milestones? • SEP • Leading Indicators/Metrics • Incentives (not disincentives) • Technical Baseline • Content • Control • Robust Product Design

  12. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • Transitioning to the SE Plan • Provides vehicle for program standardization • Map expected technical progress • Report technical indicators • IMP/IMS criteria; integration milestones; test results • Integrate these w/ incentives • How do we normalize this with contractor milestones & indicators?

  13. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering • 3 Discussion Groups • Proposal guidance for effective SE • Policy Implementation • Technical management & leading indicators • How can industry help this “revitalization”? • Speak up • Put up • Ante up

  14. NTSA Engineering ForumRevitalizing Systems Engineering QUESTIONS?

More Related